Paper · 1997 · Crop Science

Sulfur Availability, Rubisco Content, and Photosynthetic Rate of Soybean

P. J. Sexton; W. D. Batchelor; Richard Shibles

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
36
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Understanding the role of S in soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] growth is important because a deficiency of the S‐containing amino acids methionine and cysteine limits the nutritional value of soybean protein. As part of a broader study of S uptake and use, our objective was to quantify the effect of S availability on photosynthetic characteristics of soybean. Kenwood soybean was grown in a 3:1 mixture of Ida silt loam [fine‐silty, mixed (calcareous), mesic Typic Udorthent] and acid washed sand with varying amounts of S added as gypsum (CaSO 4 ) in two greenhouse trials. Single‐leaf CO 2 ‐exchange rate (CER), quantum efficiency, dark respiration, leaf S, leaf N, and Rubisco content were determined. There appeared to be a critical level of 35 mg S per kg mixture (about 85 mg S per plant) below which specific leaf S (mg m −2 leaf area) declined linearly with decreases in soil S availability. On average, the most S deficient plants had 70% lower CER, 42% less quantum efficiency, and 50% decline in dark respiration relative to plants receiving adequate S. Total leaf N and Rubisco content were linearly related to leaf S levels, and declined on average 62, and 95%, respectively, as S declined from approximately 120 to 40 mg S m −2 leaf area. There was a linear relation between CER and Rubisco content; however, the amount of nonstructural carbohydrates per unit leaf N increased two‐fold under S deficiency, suggesting that limitations on sink strength were greater than those on source capacity. Carbon dioxide exchange rate was linearly related to leaf S content at all sample dates, with a mean relation of 216 (μmol CO 2 g −1 S s −1 . The Rubisco fraction declined linearly from nearly 50 to <10% of soluble protein, as leaf soluble protein content declined under S deficiency. We postulate that the decline in the Rubisco fraction may be a function of increased relative importance of housekeeping enzymes for survival as protein levels decline, and/or down‐regulation of Rubisco synthesis in response to a build up of carbohydrates in the source leaves under S deficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most S deficient soybean plants had 70% lower CO2 exchange rate than plants with adequate S

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
most S deficiente1
Outcome
CERe1
Direction
lowere1
Value
70%e1
Comparator
plants receiving adequate Se1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Photosynthetic Rate of Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“On average, the most S deficient plants had 70% lower CER, 42% less quantum efficiency, and 50% decline in dark respiration relative to plants receiving adequate S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1067 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most S deficient soybean plants had 42% less quantum efficiency than plants with adequate S

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
most S deficiente1
Outcome
quantum efficiencye1
Direction
lesse1
Value
42%e1
Comparator
plants receiving adequate Se1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Photosynthetic Rate of Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“On average, the most S deficient plants had 70% lower CER, 42% less quantum efficiency, and 50% decline in dark respiration relative to plants receiving adequate S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1067 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most S deficient soybean plants had 50% lower dark respiration than plants with adequate S

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
most S deficiente1
Outcome
dark respiratione1
Direction
declinee1
Value
50%e1
Comparator
plants receiving adequate Se1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Photosynthetic Rate of Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“On average, the most S deficient plants had 70% lower CER, 42% less quantum efficiency, and 50% decline in dark respiration relative to plants receiving adequate S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1067 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total leaf N declined with decreasing leaf S levels

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
leaf S levelse2
Outcome
Total leaf Ne2
Direction
declinede2
Value
62e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Photosynthetic Rate of Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–72 · show in text ↑
e2

“Total leaf N and Rubisco content were linearly related to leaf S levels, and declined on average 62, and 95%, respectively, as S declined from approximately 120 to 40 mg S m −2 leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1255 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rubisco content declined with decreasing leaf S levels

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
leaf S levelse2
Outcome
Rubisco contente2
Direction
declinede2
Value
95%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Photosynthetic Rate of Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–72 · show in text ↑
e2

“Total leaf N and Rubisco content were linearly related to leaf S levels, and declined on average 62, and 95%, respectively, as S declined from approximately 120 to 40 mg S m −2 leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1255 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 exchange rate was linearly related to Rubisco content

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Gene
Rubiscoe3
Outcome
CERe3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Photosynthetic Rate of Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–72 · show in text ↑
e3

“There was a linear relation between CER and Rubisco content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1316 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The amount of nonstructural carbohydrates per unit leaf N increased under S deficiency

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
S deficiencye5
Outcome
nonstructural carbohydrates per unit leaf Ne4
Direction
increasede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Photosynthetic Rate of Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–72 · show in text ↑
e4

“the amount of nonstructural carbohydrates per unit leaf N increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1394 · show in text ↑
e5

“under S deficiency, suggesting that limitations on sink strength”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1468 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Rubisco fraction of soluble protein declined linearly from nearly 50 to below 10% as S deficiency progressed

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Gene
Rubiscoe6
Outcome
Rubisco fractione6
Direction
declinede6
Value
from nearly 50 to <10%e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Photosynthetic Rate of Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–72 · show in text ↑
e6

“The Rubisco fraction declined linearly from nearly 50 to <10% of soluble protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1735 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon dioxide exchange rate was linearly related to leaf S content at all sample dates

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
leaf S contente7
Outcome
Carbon dioxide exchange ratee7
Value
216e7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Photosynthetic Rate of Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–72 · show in text ↑
e7

“Carbon dioxide exchange rate was linearly related to leaf S content at all sample dates, with a mean relation of 216”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1629 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf S declined linearly below a critical level of 35 mg S per kg mixture as soil S availability decreased

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
soil S availabilitye0
Outcome
specific leaf Se0
Direction
declinede0
Value
35 mg S per kg mixturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Photosynthetic Rate of Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“There appeared to be a critical level of 35 mg S per kg mixture (about 85 mg S per plant) below which specific leaf S (mg m −2 leaf area) declined linearly with decreases in soil S availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–902 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The decline in the Rubisco fraction may reflect increased relative importance of housekeeping enzymes for survival

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
decline in the Rubisco fractione1
Qualifier
increased relative importance of housekeeping enzymes for survivale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Photosynthetic Rate of Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“We postulate that the decline in the Rubisco fraction may be a function of increased relative importance of housekeeping enzymes for survival as protein levels decline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1798–1965 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.