Paper · 1971 · Agronomy Journal

Growth and Water Potential of Root Crops as Influenced by Salinity and Relative Humidity1

G. J. Hoffman; S. L. Rawlins

15
claims
18
verbatim quotes
91
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The interaction of relative humidity and salinity on garden beet, onion, and radish was studied in sunlit climate chambers at temperatures cycling daily between 26 and 10 C. Average daytime relative humidity (RH) was controlled at 45 and 90%. The root medium of each crop was maintained at four different osmotic potentials, the range depending on the crop's salt tolerance. With a nonsaline root medium, increasing RH from 45 to 90% increased the yield of beet by 50% and radish by 15%, but did not enhance the yield of onion. In saline root media, high RH significantly raised the salinity level at which the yield was reduced to 50% of the nonsaline yield for onion and radish, but did not affect this level for beet. Linear relationships between leaf water (Ψ L ) and osmotic (π L ) potentials and the osmotic potential of the root medium (π S ) were found for all three crops. Except low values of π S (high salinity), Ψ L and π L were lower at 45% RH than at 90% RH. Leaf turgor potential was not affected by salinity in beet and onion but was reduced in radish. The relationship between crop yield and Ψ L was linear. The difference in Ψ L for plants between full yield and almost no yield was only 13 bars for beet, 6 bars for radish, and 4 bars for onion.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising humidity from 45 to 90% increased nonsaline beet yield by 50%.

Treatment
increasing RH from 45 to 90%e0
Outcome
yield of beete0
Direction
increasede0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
nonsaline root mediume0
Comparator
45e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With a nonsaline root medium, increasing RH from 45 to 90% increased the yield of beet by 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–477 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising humidity from 45 to 90% increased nonsaline radish yield by 15%.

Treatment
increasing RH from 45 to 90%e0
Outcome
radishe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15%e0
Qualifier
nonsaline root mediume0
Comparator
45e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With a nonsaline root medium, increasing RH from 45 to 90% increased the yield of beet by 50% and radish by 15%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising humidity did not enhance nonsaline onion yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
increasing RH from 45 to 90%e0
Outcome
yield of onione0
Direction
did not enhancee0
Comparator
45e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With a nonsaline root medium, increasing RH from 45 to 90% increased the yield of beet by 50% and radish by 15%, but did not enhance the yield of onion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity significantly raised the 50% yield-loss salinity threshold in onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
high RHe0
Outcome
salinity level at which the yield was reduced to 50% of the nonsaline yielde0
Direction
raisede0
Qualifier
saline root mediae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In saline root media, high RH significantly raised the salinity level at which the yield was reduced to 50% of the nonsaline yield for onion and radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity significantly raised the 50% yield-loss salinity threshold in radish.

Treatment
high RHe0
Outcome
salinity level at which the yield was reduced to 50% of the nonsaline yielde0
Direction
raisede0
Qualifier
saline root mediae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In saline root media, high RH significantly raised the salinity level at which the yield was reduced to 50% of the nonsaline yield for onion and radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity did not affect the 50% yield-loss salinity threshold in beet.

Treatment
high RHe0
Outcome
salinity level at which the yield was reduced to 50% of the nonsaline yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In saline root media, high RH significantly raised the salinity level at which the yield was reduced to 50% of the nonsaline yield for onion and radish, but did not affect this level for beet.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–729 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf water and osmotic potentials were linearly related to root-medium osmotic potential in all three crops.

Treatment
osmotic potential of the root medium (π S )e0
Outcome
leaf water (Ψ L ) and osmotic (π L ) potentialse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Linear relationships between leaf water (Ψ L ) and osmotic (π L ) potentials and the osmotic potential of the root medium (π S ) were found for all three crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–890 · show in text ↑
e1

“garden beet, onion, and radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At most salinity levels, leaf water and osmotic potentials were lower at 45% than 90% humidity.

Treatment
45% RHe0
Outcome
Ψ L and π Le0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
Except low values of π S (high salinity)e0
Comparator
90% RHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Except low values of π S (high salinity), Ψ L and π L were lower at 45% RH than at 90% RH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–981 · show in text ↑
e1

“garden beet, onion, and radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity did not affect beet leaf turgor potential.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
Leaf turgor potentiale0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf turgor potential was not affected by salinity in beet and onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1050 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity did not affect onion leaf turgor potential.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
Leaf turgor potentiale0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf turgor potential was not affected by salinity in beet and onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1050 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced radish leaf turgor potential.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
Leaf turgor potentiale0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf turgor potential was not affected by salinity in beet and onion but was reduced in radish.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1077 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop yield was linearly related to leaf water potential.

Organ / stage
Ψ Le0
Outcome
crop yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relationship between crop yield and Ψ L was linear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1133 · show in text ↑
e1

“garden beet, onion, and radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beet leaf water potential spanned 13 bars between full and almost no yield.

Outcome
difference in Ψ Le0
Value
13 barse0
Qualifier
between full yield and almost no yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The difference in Ψ L for plants between full yield and almost no yield was only 13 bars for beet, 6 bars for radish, and 4 bars for onion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1273 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radish leaf water potential spanned 6 bars between full and almost no yield.

Outcome
difference in Ψ Le0
Value
6 barse0
Qualifier
between full yield and almost no yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The difference in Ψ L for plants between full yield and almost no yield was only 13 bars for beet, 6 bars for radish, and 4 bars for onion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1273 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion leaf water potential spanned 4 bars between full and almost no yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
difference in Ψ Le0
Value
4 barse0
Qualifier
between full yield and almost no yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The difference in Ψ L for plants between full yield and almost no yield was only 13 bars for beet, 6 bars for radish, and 4 bars for onion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1273 · show in text ↑

humidity · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

salinity · physiology: water · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

salinity · physiology: water · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.