Abstract
SUMMARY The effect of one, two or three applications of monocrotophos at 1120 g ai/ha at weekly intervals was determined on cowpea var. Ife Brown. All regimes were equally effective in grain production in early 1974 but spray applications 35 and 42 days after planting gave the best result in the late crop. Grain production from two applications was not significantly different from three applications in 1975. The control plots in the late season of both years failed, due to moisture stress and lack of pest control measures. It is considered that two sprays at flowering is adequate to forestall a crop failure in this variety.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
One, two or three monocrotophos applications were equally effective for cowpea grain production in early 1974
- Taxon
- cowpea var. Ife Browne0
- Treatment
- one, two or three applications of monocrotophos at 1120 g ai/hae0
- Outcome
- grain productione1
- Direction
- equally effectivee1
- Qualifier
- in early 1974e1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The effect of one, two or three applications of monocrotophos at 1120 g ai/ha at weekly intervals was determined on cowpea var. Ife Brown”
e1“All regimes were equally effective in grain production in early 1974 but spray applications 35 and 42 days after planting gave the best result in the late crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Spray applications 35 and 42 days after planting gave the best result in the late crop
- Taxon
- cowpea var. Ife Browne0
- Treatment
- spray applications 35 and 42 days after plantinge1
- Outcome
- result in the late crope1
- Direction
- best resulte1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The effect of one, two or three applications of monocrotophos at 1120 g ai/ha at weekly intervals was determined on cowpea var. Ife Brown”
e1“All regimes were equally effective in grain production in early 1974 but spray applications 35 and 42 days after planting gave the best result in the late crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain production from two monocrotophos applications was not significantly different from three applications in 1975
Verbatim
e0“The effect of one, two or three applications of monocrotophos at 1120 g ai/ha at weekly intervals was determined on cowpea var. Ife Brown”
e2“Grain production from two applications was not significantly different from three applications in 1975”
Claim · model-written summary
Control plots failed in the late season of both years, due to moisture stress and lack of pest control measures
Verbatim
e0“The effect of one, two or three applications of monocrotophos at 1120 g ai/ha at weekly intervals was determined on cowpea var. Ife Brown”
e3“The control plots in the late season of both years failed, due to moisture stress and lack of pest control measures”
Claim · model-written summary
Two sprays at flowering are considered adequate to prevent crop failure of this cowpea variety
Verbatim
e0“The effect of one, two or three applications of monocrotophos at 1120 g ai/ha at weekly intervals was determined on cowpea var. Ife Brown”
e4“It is considered that two sprays at flowering is adequate to forestall a crop failure in this variety”
The same questions in other papers
monocrotophos · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.