Paper · 2010 · Acta Agronomica Hungarica

Effect of high temperature and drought on the composition of gluten proteins in Martonvásár wheat varieties

K. Balla; M. Rakszegi; S. Bencze; et al.

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Finding and improving wheat cultivars with good adaptability to abiotic stress is an important objective in breeding programmes. An experiment was set up in the climate chamber of the Martonvásár phytotron to test the effect of heat and drought stress on two winter wheat varieties and one variety of durum. Wheat plants exposed to 35°C and drought during grain filling exhibited altered agronomic and grain quality characteristics. Drought was found to have a much greater influence on yield and quality than heat stress. Reductions in the unextractable polymeric protein fraction and the glutenin-to-gliadin ratio indicated poorer grain yield quality as a result of drought, despite higher protein content. Quality deterioration was observed after drought, while heat stress had no noticeable influence on the protein quality of the three wheat genotypes, measured using size exclusion high performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC). The durum variety had a better ratio of protein components and a significantly higher Zeleny value when exposed to heat stress, although it had the lowest grain yield and grain/straw ratio.The most significant negative correlation was observed between the Zeleny value and the unextractable polymeric protein (UPP%) fraction after heat treatment and between the relative protein content and the albumin+globulin % (AG%) in the case of drought. These correlations testify that these parameters play an important role in determining the baking quality of wheat flour.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought influenced wheat yield more than heat stress.

Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
much greater influencee0
Comparator
heat stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought was found to have a much greater influence on yield and quality than heat stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–522 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought influenced wheat quality more than heat stress.

Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
much greater influencee0
Comparator
heat stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought was found to have a much greater influence on yield and quality than heat stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–522 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced the unextractable polymeric protein fraction.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
unextractable polymeric protein fractione0
Direction
Reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reductions in the unextractable polymeric protein fraction and the glutenin-to-gliadin ratio indicated poorer grain yield quality as a result of drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced the glutenin-to-gliadin ratio.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
glutenin-to-gliadin ratioe0
Direction
Reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reductions in the unextractable polymeric protein fraction and the glutenin-to-gliadin ratio indicated poorer grain yield quality as a result of drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased protein content despite poorer quality.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as a result of drought, despite higher protein content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought deteriorated protein quality in the wheat genotypes.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
Qualitye0
Direction
deterioratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Quality deterioration was observed after drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat stress had no noticeable effect on protein quality in three wheat genotypes.

Treatment
heat stresse0
Outcome
protein qualitye0
Direction
no noticeable influencee0
Qualifier
three wheat genotypese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“heat stress had no noticeable influence on the protein quality of the three wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–856 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under heat stress, durum had a better protein component ratio.

Material
durum varietye0
Treatment
heat stresse0
Outcome
ratio of protein componentse0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The durum variety had a better ratio of protein components and a significantly higher Zeleny value when exposed to heat stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under heat stress, durum had a significantly higher Zeleny value.

Material
durum varietye0
Treatment
heat stresse0
Outcome
Zeleny valuee0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The durum variety had a better ratio of protein components and a significantly higher Zeleny value when exposed to heat stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The durum variety had the lowest grain yield.

Material
durum varietyt1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“although it had the lowest grain yield and grain/straw ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
t1

“The durum variety had a better ratio of protein components and a significantly higher Zeleny value when exposed to heat stress, although it had the lowest grain yield and grain/straw ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The durum variety had the lowest grain to straw ratio.

Material
durum varietyt1
Outcome
grain/straw ratioe0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“although it had the lowest grain yield and grain/straw ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
t1

“The durum variety had a better ratio of protein components and a significantly higher Zeleny value when exposed to heat stress, although it had the lowest grain yield and grain/straw ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1127 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After heat treatment, Zeleny value and UPP fraction had the strongest negative correlation.

Treatment
heat treatmente0
Outcome
Zeleny valuee0
Direction
negative correlatione0
Comparator
unextractable polymeric protein (UPP%) fractione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most significant negative correlation was observed between the Zeleny value and the unextractable polymeric protein (UPP%) fraction after heat treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, relative protein content and albumin plus globulin percentage had a negative correlation.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
relative protein contente0
Direction
negative correlationt1
Comparator
albumin+globulin % (AG%)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“between the relative protein content and the albumin+globulin % (AG%) in the case of drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
t1

“The most significant negative correlation was observed between the Zeleny value and the unextractable polymeric protein (UPP%) fraction after heat treatment and between the relative protein content and the albumin+globulin % (AG%) in the case of drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1381 · show in text ↑

heat · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

50 papers: 26 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

drought · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

60 papers: 32 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

drought · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 4 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.