Paper · 2003 · Journal of Sustainable Agriculture

Response of Sweet Corn to Red Clover Under Two Tillage Methods

Marianne Sarrantonio; Thomas Molloy

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT A study was conducted in 1999–2001 in central Maine to compare the effects of a spader plow versus a rototiller on nitrogen mineralization and growth of sweet corn (Zea mays L.) following red clover (Trifolium pratense L.). Spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was established the first year of the rotation, with and without a red clover co-seeding. The following spring, clover and wheat stubble were incorporated with either a rototiller or a spader plow, which incorporates the residue deeper and with little or no chopping or tearing. Sweet corn was planted with no additional N inputs. Sweet corn growth and yield parameters were monitored, as was soil nitrate and total mineral N throughout the corn growing season. In both 2000 and 2001, sweet corn after clover yielded significantly more (p < 0.05) in all yield parameters than sweet corn after no clover. There were no significant differences in sweet corn yield parameters between the two tillage treatments in either year, although there was a consistent trend for sweet corn after clover to yield higher in rototilled plots than spaded plots. In both years total N content of corn biomass was greater in the rototilled than in the spaded treatment following clover. Soil nitrogen monitoring showed that in both 2000 and 2001, soil nitrate and total mineral N were greater early in the season under the spaded treatments. Corn grown under this treatment utilized available nitrate after clover less efficiently than in the rototilled treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn grown after red clover yielded significantly more in all yield parameters than sweet corn after no clover in 2000 and 2001.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
after clovere1
Outcome
yield parameterse1
Direction
moree1
Qualifier
In both 2000 and 2001e1
Comparator
no clovere1
Setting
central Mainee2

Verbatim

e0

“growth of sweet corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–186 · show in text ↑
e1

“In both 2000 and 2001, sweet corn after clover yielded significantly more (p < 0.05) in all yield parameters than sweet corn after no clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–871 · show in text ↑
e2

“A study was conducted in 1999–2001 in central Maine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no significant difference in sweet corn yield parameters between rototilled and spaded tillage in either year.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
tillage treatmentse1
Outcome
yield parameterse1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Qualifier
in either yeare1
Comparator
spadede1

Verbatim

e0

“growth of sweet corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–186 · show in text ↑
e1

“There were no significant differences in sweet corn yield parameters between the two tillage treatments in either year, although there was a consistent trend for sweet corn after clover to yield higher in rototilled plots than spaded plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn after clover showed a consistent, non-significant trend to yield higher in rototilled than in spaded plots.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
rototillede1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
consistent trende1
Comparator
spadede1

Verbatim

e0

“growth of sweet corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–186 · show in text ↑
e1

“There were no significant differences in sweet corn yield parameters between the two tillage treatments in either year, although there was a consistent trend for sweet corn after clover to yield higher in rototilled plots than spaded plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total N content of corn biomass after clover was greater with rototilling than with spading.

Treatment
rototillede0
Outcome
total N content of corn biomasse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
spaded treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both years total N content of corn biomass was greater in the rototilled than in the spaded treatment following clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrate and total mineral N were greater early in the season under the spaded treatments in both years.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
spaded treatmentse1
Outcome
soil nitrate and total mineral Ne1
Direction
greatere1
Qualifier
early in the seasone1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“growth of sweet corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–186 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil nitrogen monitoring showed that in both 2000 and 2001, soil nitrate and total mineral N were greater early in the season under the spaded treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn after clover utilized available nitrate less efficiently under the spaded treatment than under rototilling.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
spaded treatmentse2
Outcome
utilized available nitratee1
Direction
less efficientlye1
Comparator
rototilled treatmente1

Verbatim

e0

“growth of sweet corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–186 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn grown under this treatment utilized available nitrate after clover less efficiently than in the rototilled treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1513 · show in text ↑
e2

“Soil nitrogen monitoring showed that in both 2000 and 2001, soil nitrate and total mineral N were greater early in the season under the spaded treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1390 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.