Abstract
Peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) in the USA is generally seeded after several primary tillage operations that may include disking, chisel plowing, moldboard plowing, and bedding (conventional tillage systems). Concerns over erosion and production costs have increased interest in reduced tillage systems. Production in reduced tillage systems minimizes ability to incorporate fertilizers below the pegging zone, and residue on soil surface could impact movement of calcium sulfate (CaSO 4 ) into the soil, reducing Ca availability to pegs. Research was conducted from 1997 through 1999 to compare peanut yield and gross economic value of virginia market type peanut planted in conventional and strip tillage systems. Preplant fertilizer did not affect response to tillage. Response did not differ among conventional tillage systems consisting of disk, disk and chisel, or disk and moldboard plow or among reduced tillage systems. Pod yield of peanut grown in the most effective conventional tillage system exceeded yield when peanut was strip‐tilled into stubble of the previous crop, strip‐tilled into a wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) cover crop, or strip‐tilled into beds prepared the previous fall without a cover crop. Tillage system and CaSO 4 rate affected pod yield and gross value independently. Gross value increased when CaSO 4 was applied regardless of tillage system. These data suggest that preplant fertilizer at relatively low, remedial rates does not affect peanut response to tillage systems. These data also suggest that tillage system does not have a major impact on peanut response to CaSO 4 . Collectively, these data indicate that the highest peanut yields occur in conventional tillage systems.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Preplant fertilizer did not alter peanut response to tillage.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- Preplant fertilizere0
- Outcome
- response to tillagee0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Preplant fertilizer did not affect response to tillage.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut response did not differ among the listed conventional tillage systems.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Outcome
- Responsee0
- Direction
- did not differe0
- Comparator
- conventional tillage systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Response did not differ among conventional tillage systems consisting of disk, disk and chisel, or disk and moldboard plow or among reduced tillage systems.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut response did not differ among reduced tillage systems.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Outcome
- Responsee0
- Direction
- did not differe0
- Comparator
- reduced tillage systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Response did not differ among conventional tillage systems consisting of disk, disk and chisel, or disk and moldboard plow or among reduced tillage systems.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
The best conventional tillage system produced greater peanut pod yield than strip tillage into previous crop stubble.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- most effective conventional tillage systeme0
- Outcome
- Pod yielde0
- Direction
- exceedede0
- Comparator
- strip‐tilled into stubble of the previous crope0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pod yield of peanut grown in the most effective conventional tillage system exceeded yield when peanut was strip‐tilled into stubble of the previous crop, strip‐tilled into a wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) cover crop, or strip‐tilled into beds prepared the previous fall without a cover crop.”
Claim · model-written summary
The best conventional tillage system produced greater peanut pod yield than strip tillage into a wheat cover crop.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- most effective conventional tillage systeme0
- Outcome
- Pod yielde0
- Direction
- exceedede0
- Comparator
- strip‐tilled into a wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) cover crope0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pod yield of peanut grown in the most effective conventional tillage system exceeded yield when peanut was strip‐tilled into stubble of the previous crop, strip‐tilled into a wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) cover crop, or strip‐tilled into beds prepared the previous fall without a cover crop.”
Claim · model-written summary
The best conventional tillage system produced greater peanut pod yield than strip tillage into beds prepared the previous fall.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- most effective conventional tillage systeme0
- Outcome
- Pod yielde0
- Direction
- exceedede0
- Comparator
- strip‐tilled into beds prepared the previous fall without a cover crope0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pod yield of peanut grown in the most effective conventional tillage system exceeded yield when peanut was strip‐tilled into stubble of the previous crop, strip‐tilled into a wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) cover crop, or strip‐tilled into beds prepared the previous fall without a cover crop.”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage system affected peanut pod yield independently of calcium sulfate rate.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Tillage systeme0
- Outcome
- pod yielde0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tillage system and CaSO 4 rate affected pod yield and gross value independently.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium sulfate rate affected peanut pod yield independently of tillage.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- CaSO 4 ratee0
- Outcome
- pod yielde0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tillage system and CaSO 4 rate affected pod yield and gross value independently.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage system affected peanut gross value independently of calcium sulfate rate.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Tillage systeme0
- Outcome
- gross valuee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tillage system and CaSO 4 rate affected pod yield and gross value independently.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium sulfate rate affected peanut gross value independently of tillage.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- CaSO 4 ratee0
- Outcome
- gross valuee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tillage system and CaSO 4 rate affected pod yield and gross value independently.”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium sulfate application increased peanut gross value regardless of tillage system.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- CaSO 4e0
- Outcome
- Gross valuee0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Gross value increased when CaSO 4 was applied regardless of tillage system.”
t0“Peanut”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- positive
86 papers more in this group
See all 90 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.