Paper · 2011 · The Plant Cell

Chilling of Dormant Buds HyperinducesFLOWERING LOCUS Tand Recruits GA-Inducible 1,3-β-Glucanases to Reopen Signal Conduits and Release Dormancy inPopulus

Päivi L.H. Rinne; Annikki Welling; Jorma Vahala; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
538
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In trees, production of intercellular signals and accessibility of signal conduits jointly govern dormancy cycling at the shoot apex. We identified 10 putative cell wall 1,3-β-glucanase genes (glucan hydrolase family 17 [GH17]) in Populus that could turn over 1,3-β-glucan (callose) at pores and plasmodesmata (PD) and investigated their regulation in relation to FT and CENL1 expression. The 10 genes encode orthologs of Arabidopsis thaliana BG_ppap, a PD-associated glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) lipid-anchored protein, the Arabidopsis PD callose binding protein PDCB, and a birch (Betula pendula) putative lipid body (LB) protein. We found that these genes were differentially regulated by photoperiod, by chilling (5°C), and by feeding of gibberellins GA(3) and GA(4). GA(3) feeding upregulated all LB-associated GH17s, whereas GA(4) upregulated most GH17s with a GPI anchor and/or callose binding motif, but only GA(4) induced true bud burst. Chilling upregulated a number of GA biosynthesis and signaling genes as well as FT, but not CENL1, while the reverse was true for both GA(3) and GA(4). Collectively, the results suggest a model for dormancy release in which chilling induces FT and both GPI lipid-anchored and GA(3)-inducible GH17s to reopen signaling conduits in the embryonic shoot. When temperatures rise, the reopened conduits enable movement of FT and CENL1 to their targets, where they drive bud burst, shoot elongation, and morphogenesis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten putative GH17 genes were identified in Populus.

Taxon
PopulusPopuluse0
Gene
cell wall 1,3-β-glucanase genese0
Outcome
identified 10 putative cell wall 1,3-β-glucanase genese0
Value
10e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We identified 10 putative cell wall 1,3-β-glucanase genes (glucan hydrolase family 17 [GH17]) in Populus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–238 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Populus GH17 genes encode orthologs of Arabidopsis proteins associated with plasmodesmata or lipid bodies.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Gene
10 genese0
Outcome
orthologs of Arabidopsis thaliana BG_ppape0
Value
10e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 10 genes encode orthologs of Arabidopsis thaliana BG_ppap, a PD-associated glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) lipid-anchored protein, the Arabidopsis PD callose binding protein PDCB, and a birch (Betula pendula) putative lipid body (LB) protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–153 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Populus GH17 genes were differentially regulated by photoperiod, chilling and gibberellin feeding.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Treatment
photoperiode0
Gene
these genese0
Outcome
differentially regulatede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these genes were differentially regulated by photoperiod, by chilling (5°C), and by feeding of gibberellins GA(3) and GA(4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA(3) feeding upregulated all lipid-body-associated GH17 genes in Populus.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Treatment
GA(3) feedinge0
Gene
LB-associated GH17se0
Outcome
LB-associated GH17se0
Direction
upregulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA(3) feeding upregulated all LB-associated GH17s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA(4) upregulated most GPI-anchor or callose-binding GH17 genes in Populus.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Treatment
GA(4)e0
Gene
GH17se0
Outcome
GH17s with a GPI anchor and/or callose binding motife0
Direction
upregulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA(4) upregulated most GH17s with a GPI anchor and/or callose binding motif”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA(4), unlike GA(3), induced true bud burst in Populus.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Organ / stage
bude0
Treatment
GA(4)e0
Outcome
true bud burste0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only GA(4) induced true bud burst”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling upregulated several GA biosynthesis and signaling genes and FT in Populus.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Treatment
Chillinge0
Gene
FTe0
Outcome
GA biosynthesis and signaling genes as well as FTe0
Direction
upregulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chilling upregulated a number of GA biosynthesis and signaling genes as well as FT, but not CENL1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling did not upregulate CENL1 in Populus.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Treatment
Chillinge0
Gene
CENL1e0
Outcome
CENL1e0
Direction
but note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chilling upregulated a number of GA biosynthesis and signaling genes as well as FT, but not CENL1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA(3) and GA(4) feeding produced the reverse gene response to chilling in Populus.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Treatment
GA(3) and GA(4)e0
Outcome
GA biosynthesis and signaling genes as well as FT, but not CENL1e1
Direction
reversee0
Comparator
Chillinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the reverse was true for both GA(3) and GA(4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chilling upregulated a number of GA biosynthesis and signaling genes as well as FT, but not CENL1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–153 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose that chilling induces FT and GH17s to reopen signaling conduits in the embryonic shoot.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Organ / stage
embryonic shoote0
Treatment
chillinge0
Gene
FTe0
Outcome
reopen signaling conduitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chilling induces FT and both GPI lipid-anchored and GA(3)-inducible GH17s to reopen signaling conduits in the embryonic shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–153 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose that reopened conduits allow FT and CENL1 movement that drives bud burst, shoot elongation and morphogenesis.

Taxon
PopulusPopulust0
Gene
FT and CENL1e0
Outcome
bud burst, shoot elongation, and morphogenesise0
Qualifier
reopened conduits enable movemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reopened conduits enable movement of FT and CENL1 to their targets, where they drive bud burst, shoot elongation, and morphogenesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1463 · show in text ↑
t0

“Populus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–153 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · molecular: metabolites · Populus (poplar)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

cold · molecular: expression · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.