Paper · 1996 · Grass and Forage Science

An evaluation of the effects of rate of nitrogen fertilization of grassland on silage fermentation, in‐silo losses, effluent production and aerobic stability

T. W. J. KEADY; P. O'KIELY

16
claims
36
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A factorial experiment was carried out to evaluate the effects of level of nitrogen (N) application to grassland and subsequent treatment of the herbage at ensiling with formic acid on the rate of silage fermentation, dry‐matter (DM) recovery, aerobic stability and effluent production. Herbage from the primary regrowth of predominantly perennial ryegrass swards received either 72 (LN), 126 (MN) or 180 (HN) kg N ha −1 . The herbages were harvested and yield estimated after a 50‐day regrowth interval. After storage for 24 h in polythene bags, the herbages were ensiled, unwilled, in laboratory silos (6 kg capacity) either untreated (UT) or treated with formic acid (F) at 3 ml (kg herbage) −1 . Three silos per treatment were opened and sampled on days 1, 3, 6, 15, 50 and 105 after ensiling. The mean herbage yields for the LN, MN and HN swards were 5.2, 6.3 and 6.2 (s.e. = 0.27) t DM ha −1 and there was no carryover effect of nitrogen treatment on the yield of a subsequent 22‐day regrowth harvested on 2 September. As level of fertilizer N application increased, concentrations in the herbage at mowing of crude protein, nitrate and ash increased, DM decreased and water‐soluble carbohydrate and in vitro DM digestibility remained unchanged. Increasing the rate of N fertilizer to the sward resulted in higher silage pH ( P < 0.001) and ammonia N concentrations ( P <0.001) at each time of sampling. Increasing the rate of fertilizer N increased effluent output ( P < 0.001) and DM recovery ( P < 0.001). Aerobic stability was improved ( P <0.001) by use of high rates of N fertilizer application. Formic acid treatment restricted fermentation and increased effluent output ( P <0.001) but had no effect ( P > 0.05) on DM recovery. It is concluded that the rate and extent of pH decline was reduced with increasing N application, associated with increased buffering capacity and decreased DM concentrations of the herbage at ensiling. However, increasing the level of N fertilizer applied increased DM recovery and effluent output, and improved aerobic stability of the resulting silages.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen fertilizer rates increased crude protein, nitrate and ash concentrations in perennial ryegrass herbage at mowing.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Organ / stage
herbagee1
Treatment
level of fertilizer N applicatione1
Outcome
concentrations in the herbage at mowing of crude protein, nitrate and ashe1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage from the primary regrowth of predominantly perennial ryegrass swards received either 72 (LN), 126 (MN) or 180 (HN) kg N ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“As level of fertilizer N application increased, concentrations in the herbage at mowing of crude protein, nitrate and ash increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen fertilizer rates decreased the DM concentration of perennial ryegrass herbage.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
level of fertilizer N applicatione2
Outcome
DMe2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage from the primary regrowth of predominantly perennial ryegrass swards received either 72 (LN), 126 (MN) or 180 (HN) kg N ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–426 · show in text ↑
e2

“As level of fertilizer N application increased, concentrations in the herbage at mowing of crude protein, nitrate and ash increased, DM decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-soluble carbohydrate and in vitro DM digestibility of the herbage were unchanged by nitrogen fertilizer rate.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
level of fertilizer N applicatione1
Outcome
water‐soluble carbohydrate and in vitro DM digestibilitye3
Direction
remained unchangede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage from the primary regrowth of predominantly perennial ryegrass swards received either 72 (LN), 126 (MN) or 180 (HN) kg N ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“As level of fertilizer N application increased, concentrations in the herbage at mowing of crude protein, nitrate and ash increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1165 · show in text ↑
e3

“water‐soluble carbohydrate and in vitro DM digestibility remained unchanged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the nitrogen fertilizer rate to the sward resulted in higher silage pH at each sampling time.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
rate of N fertilizer to the swarde4
Outcome
silage pHe4
Direction
highere4
Qualifier
at each time of samplinge4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage from the primary regrowth of predominantly perennial ryegrass swards received either 72 (LN), 126 (MN) or 180 (HN) kg N ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–426 · show in text ↑
e4

“Increasing the rate of N fertilizer to the sward resulted in higher silage pH ( P < 0.001) and ammonia N concentrations ( P <0.001) at each time of sampling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the nitrogen fertilizer rate increased ammonia N concentrations in the silage at each sampling time.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
rate of N fertilizer to the swarde4
Outcome
ammonia N concentrationse4
Direction
highere4
Qualifier
at each time of samplinge4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage from the primary regrowth of predominantly perennial ryegrass swards received either 72 (LN), 126 (MN) or 180 (HN) kg N ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–426 · show in text ↑
e4

“Increasing the rate of N fertilizer to the sward resulted in higher silage pH ( P < 0.001) and ammonia N concentrations ( P <0.001) at each time of sampling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the nitrogen fertilizer rate increased effluent output from the silage.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
rate of fertilizer Ne5
Outcome
effluent outpute5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage from the primary regrowth of predominantly perennial ryegrass swards received either 72 (LN), 126 (MN) or 180 (HN) kg N ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–426 · show in text ↑
e5

“Increasing the rate of fertilizer N increased effluent output ( P < 0.001) and DM recovery ( P < 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1419–1522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the nitrogen fertilizer rate increased DM recovery of the silage.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
rate of fertilizer Ne5
Outcome
DM recoverye5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage from the primary regrowth of predominantly perennial ryegrass swards received either 72 (LN), 126 (MN) or 180 (HN) kg N ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–426 · show in text ↑
e5

“Increasing the rate of fertilizer N increased effluent output ( P < 0.001) and DM recovery ( P < 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1419–1522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen fertilizer rates improved the aerobic stability of the silage.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
high rates of N fertilizer applicatione6
Outcome
Aerobic stabilitye6
Direction
improvede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage from the primary regrowth of predominantly perennial ryegrass swards received either 72 (LN), 126 (MN) or 180 (HN) kg N ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–426 · show in text ↑
e6

“Aerobic stability was improved ( P <0.001) by use of high rates of N fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1615 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Formic acid treatment restricted silage fermentation compared with untreated herbage.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
Formic acid treatmente7
Outcome
fermentatione7
Direction
restrictede7
Comparator
untreated (UT)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage from the primary regrowth of predominantly perennial ryegrass swards received either 72 (LN), 126 (MN) or 180 (HN) kg N ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–426 · show in text ↑
e7

“Formic acid treatment restricted fermentation and increased effluent output ( P <0.001) but had no effect ( P > 0.05) on DM recovery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1749 · show in text ↑
e6

“either untreated (UT) or treated with formic acid (F)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Formic acid treatment increased silage effluent output compared with untreated herbage.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
Formic acid treatmente7
Outcome
effluent outpute7
Direction
increasede7
Comparator
untreated (UT)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage from the primary regrowth of predominantly perennial ryegrass swards received either 72 (LN), 126 (MN) or 180 (HN) kg N ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–426 · show in text ↑
e7

“Formic acid treatment restricted fermentation and increased effluent output ( P <0.001) but had no effect ( P > 0.05) on DM recovery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1749 · show in text ↑
e6

“either untreated (UT) or treated with formic acid (F)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Formic acid treatment had no effect on DM recovery compared with untreated herbage.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
Formic acid treatmente7
Outcome
DM recoverye7
Direction
had no effecte7
Comparator
untreated (UT)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage from the primary regrowth of predominantly perennial ryegrass swards received either 72 (LN), 126 (MN) or 180 (HN) kg N ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–426 · show in text ↑
e7

“Formic acid treatment restricted fermentation and increased effluent output ( P <0.001) but had no effect ( P > 0.05) on DM recovery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1749 · show in text ↑
e6

“either untreated (UT) or treated with formic acid (F)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–682 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rate and extent of silage pH decline were reduced with increasing nitrogen application, associated with increased buffering capacity and decreased herbage DM concentration at ensiling.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
increasing N applicatione1
Outcome
rate and extent of pH declinee1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
associated with increased buffering capacitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage from the primary regrowth of predominantly perennial ryegrass swards received either 72 (LN), 126 (MN) or 180 (HN) kg N ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“It is concluded that the rate and extent of pH decline was reduced with increasing N application, associated with increased buffering capacity and decreased DM concentrations of the herbage at ensiling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1952 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean herbage yield of the low-nitrogen (72 kg N ha) swards was 5.2 t DM ha.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
72 (LN)e0
Outcome
mean herbage yieldse1
Value
5.2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage from the primary regrowth of predominantly perennial ryegrass swards received either 72 (LN), 126 (MN) or 180 (HN) kg N ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“The mean herbage yields for the LN, MN and HN swards were 5.2, 6.3 and 6.2 (s.e. = 0.27) t DM ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–903 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean herbage yield of the medium-nitrogen (126 kg N ha) swards was 6.3 t DM ha.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
126 (MN)e0
Outcome
mean herbage yieldse1
Value
6.3e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage from the primary regrowth of predominantly perennial ryegrass swards received either 72 (LN), 126 (MN) or 180 (HN) kg N ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“The mean herbage yields for the LN, MN and HN swards were 5.2, 6.3 and 6.2 (s.e. = 0.27) t DM ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–903 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean herbage yield of the high-nitrogen (180 kg N ha) swards was 6.2 t DM ha.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
180 (HN)e0
Outcome
mean herbage yieldse1
Value
6.2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage from the primary regrowth of predominantly perennial ryegrass swards received either 72 (LN), 126 (MN) or 180 (HN) kg N ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“The mean herbage yields for the LN, MN and HN swards were 5.2, 6.3 and 6.2 (s.e. = 0.27) t DM ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen treatment had no carryover effect on the yield of a subsequent regrowth.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
nitrogen treatmente1
Outcome
yield of a subsequent 22‐day regrowthe1
Direction
no carryover effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage from the primary regrowth of predominantly perennial ryegrass swards received either 72 (LN), 126 (MN) or 180 (HN) kg N ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–426 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was no carryover effect of nitrogen treatment on the yield of a subsequent 22‐day regrowth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1007 · show in text ↑

formic acid · growth · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Results differ

29 papers: 20 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Results differ

59 papers: 44 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

fertilization · growth · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 28 positive, 7 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.