Paper · 1990 · Grass and Forage Science

Response of permanent and reseeded grassland to fertilizer nitrogen. 1. Herbage production and herbage quality

A. HOPKINS; J. GILBEY; C. DIBB; et al.

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
95
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The productivity of permanent swards of mixed species composition was compared with that of sown Lolium perenne , cv. Melle at five fertilizer‐N rates (0, 150, 300, 450 and 900 kg N ha −1 ) and with L. perenne/Trifolium repens , cv. Grasslands Huia at 0 kg N ha −1 . The investigation was conducted under two cutting frequencies at sixteen sites in England and Wales, representing a range of grassland environments. Annual total herbage dry matter (DM) production from both permanent and reseeded swards increased with successive increments of fertilizer‐N up to 450 kg N ha −1 . Herbage DM production from reseeded swards in the first year after sowing was signficantly higher than from the permanent swards, at all fertilizer‐N treatments. In subsequent years the production advantage of the L. perenne reseeds was maintained only at the higher N rates, though sown L. perenne/T. repens was the most productive sward type at 0 N. Average differences in modified acid‐detergent fibre suggested small advantages in herbage quality to the reseeded swards. It is concluded that, while reseeded swards are more productive in the year after sowing, many permanent swards are capable of high levels of production and that reseeding to a L. perenne sward cannot always be justified, particularly for grassland receiving low or moderate inputs of fertilizer‐N.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbage dry matter production increased with fertilizer nitrogen increments up to 450 kg N ha −1.

Treatment
fertilizer‐N up to 450 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
herbage dry matter (DM) productione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
successive increments of fertilizer‐Ne0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Annual total herbage dry matter (DM) production from both permanent and reseeded swards increased with successive increments of fertilizer‐N up to 450 kg N ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reseeded swards produced significantly more herbage dry matter than permanent swards in the first year at all nitrogen treatments.

Treatment
reseeded swardse0
Outcome
Herbage DM productione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
first year after sowinge0
Comparator
permanent swardse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Herbage DM production from reseeded swards in the first year after sowing was signficantly higher than from the permanent swards, at all fertilizer‐N treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–750 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Lolium perenne reseed production advantage persisted in later years only at higher nitrogen rates.

Taxon
L. perenneLolium perennee0
Outcome
production advantagee0
Qualifier
only at the higher N ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In subsequent years the production advantage of the L. perenne reseeds was maintained only at the higher N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–863 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sown Lolium perenne and Trifolium repens was the most productive sward at zero nitrogen.

Taxon
L. perenneLolium perennee0
Treatment
0 Ne0
Outcome
most productive sward typee0
Direction
most productivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sown L. perenne/T. repens was the most productive sward type at 0 N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–940 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modified acid detergent fibre differences suggested a small quality advantage for reseeded swards.

Outcome
herbage qualitye0
Direction
advantagese0
Qualifier
smalle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Average differences in modified acid‐detergent fibre suggested small advantages in herbage quality to the reseeded swards.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1063 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude reseeding to Lolium perenne cannot always be justified, especially with low or moderate nitrogen input.

Taxon
L. perenneLolium perennee0
Outcome
reseeding to a L. perenne sward cannot always be justifiede0
Qualifier
low or moderate inputs of fertilizer‐Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reseeding to a L. perenne sward cannot always be justified, particularly for grassland receiving low or moderate inputs of fertilizer‐N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1362 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Results differ

29 papers: 20 positive, 9 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

fertilization · growth · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 28 positive, 7 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.