Paper · 2004 · Weed Technology

Potential Use of Imazethapyr Mixtures in Drill-Seeded Imidazolinone-Resistant Rice

Kristie J. Pellerin; Eric P. Webster; Wei Zhang; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The efficacy of imazethapyr in drill-seeded imidazolinone-resistant rice was evaluated in Louisiana in 2000 and 2001. Imazethapyr was applied preemergence (PRE), or no PRE, followed by a postemergence (POST) application of imazethapyr alone, or in a mixture with bensulfuron, bentazon plus aciflurofen, carfentrazone, halosulfuron, propanil plus molinate, triclopyr, or V-10029. Imazethapyr applied PRE followed by a POST application of imazethapyr controlled barnyardgrass equivalent to or higher than other treatments evaluated. Red rice control at 35 days after postemergence treatment (DAT) was 66 to 81% with imazethapyr applied PRE followed by any POST application, but a reduction in control was observed with a POST application of imazethapyr. Although alligatorweed control increased with POST applications, these treatments suggested only suppression. Hemp sesbania control never exceeded 10% with imazethapyr-only treatments and at 35 DAT, all POST applications, except bensulfuron, increased control above 84%. Rice yield increased with treatments receiving a PRE application of imazethapyr compared with no imazethapyr applied PRE.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE then POST imazethapyr controlled barnyardgrass at least as well as other treatments.

Treatment
Imazethapyr applied PRE followed by a POST application of imazethapyre0
Interactor
barnyardgrassEchinochloa crus-gallie0weed
Outcome
controlled barnyardgrasse0
Direction
equivalent to or highere0
Comparator
other treatments evaluatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imazethapyr applied PRE followed by a POST application of imazethapyr controlled barnyardgrass equivalent to or higher than other treatments evaluated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–530 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potential Use of Imazethapyr Mixtures in Drill-Seeded Imidazolinone-Resistant Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE imazethapyr followed by POST treatment gave 66 to 81% red rice control at 35 DAT.

Treatment
imazethapyr applied PRE followed by any POST applicatione0
Interactor
Red ricee0weed
Outcome
Red rice controle0
Value
66 to 81%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Red rice control at 35 days after postemergence treatment (DAT) was 66 to 81% with imazethapyr applied PRE followed by any POST application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potential Use of Imazethapyr Mixtures in Drill-Seeded Imidazolinone-Resistant Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST imazethapyr reduced red rice control.

Treatment
POST application of imazethapyre0
Interactor
Red ricee0weed
Outcome
Red rice controle0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Red rice control at 35 days after postemergence treatment (DAT) was 66 to 81% with imazethapyr applied PRE followed by any POST application, but a reduction in control was observed with a POST application of imazethapyr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potential Use of Imazethapyr Mixtures in Drill-Seeded Imidazolinone-Resistant Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST applications increased alligatorweed control but achieved only suppression.

Treatment
POST applicationse0
Interactor
alligatorweede0weed
Outcome
alligatorweed controle0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
only suppressione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although alligatorweed control increased with POST applications, these treatments suggested only suppression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–861 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potential Use of Imazethapyr Mixtures in Drill-Seeded Imidazolinone-Resistant Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr-only treatments gave at most 10% hemp sesbania control.

Treatment
imazethapyr-only treatmentse0
Interactor
Hemp sesbaniae0weed
Outcome
Hemp sesbania controle0
Direction
never exceedede0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hemp sesbania control never exceeded 10% with imazethapyr-only treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potential Use of Imazethapyr Mixtures in Drill-Seeded Imidazolinone-Resistant Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All POST applications except bensulfuron increased hemp sesbania control above 84% at 35 DAT.

Treatment
all POST applicationse0
Interactor
Hemp sesbaniae0weed
Outcome
Hemp sesbania controle0
Direction
increasede0
Value
84%e0
Comparator
bensulfurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hemp sesbania control never exceeded 10% with imazethapyr-only treatments and at 35 DAT, all POST applications, except bensulfuron, increased control above 84%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potential Use of Imazethapyr Mixtures in Drill-Seeded Imidazolinone-Resistant Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE imazethapyr increased rice yield relative to no PRE imazethapyr.

Treatment
PRE application of imazethapyre0
Outcome
Rice yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no imazethapyr applied PREe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice yield increased with treatments receiving a PRE application of imazethapyr compared with no imazethapyr applied PRE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1144 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · Echinochloa crus-galli · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Imazethapyr · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 11 positive, 12 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

herbicide · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 21 positive, 6 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

herbicide · Echinochloa crus-galli · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 30 positive, 4 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.