Paper · 2015 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Effect of chemical and hand thinning on growth, yield and fruit quality of nectarine (Prunus persicaBatsch var.nucipersica)

J.S. Chandel; Jagjeevan Singh

12
claims
28
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2009 and 2010 to study the influence of fruit thinning on growth, yield, proportion of different grades fruit and fruit quality of nectarine. The thinning treatments consisted of foliar spray of NAA at 20, 40 and 60 ppm, ethrel at 100, 200 and 300 ppm, thidiazuron at 10, 20 and 30 ppm 3 weeks after petal fall, selective mannual removal of fruits to the intensity of 10, 20 and 30 per cent at pea stage and unthinned control. The results revealed that both chemical and manual thinning significantly improved fruit size, weight and proportion of ‘A’ grade fruits. Among the chemical thinning treatments, application of 300 ppm ethrel judiciously thinned fruitlets (24.15 & 25.38%), improved size and weight (89.90 & 92.75 g/fruit) of fruits, proportion of ‘A’ and ‘B’ grades fruits without any adverse effect on total yield as compared to other chemical treatments. Trees sprayed with 60 ppm NAA attained highest shoot length, tree volume and leaf area. Ethrel at 300 ppm and NAA at 60 ppm significantly increased TSS (14.23 & 14.31%), total and reducing sugars as compared to control. The net return of Rs. 668 and 982 per tree during 2009 and 2010, respectively and fruit quality attributes were also better with 300 ppm ethrel treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical and manual thinning significantly improved fruit size, weight and the proportion of A-grade fruit in nectarine relative to unthinned control.

Organ / stage
fruitse1
Treatment
chemical and manual thinninge1
Outcome
fruit size, weight and proportion of ‘A’ grade fruitse1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
unthinned controle2
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during 2009 and 2010 to study the influence of fruit thinning on growth, yield, proportion of different grades fruit and fruit quality of nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–180 · show in text ↑
e1

“both chemical and manual thinning significantly improved fruit size, weight and proportion of ‘A’ grade fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–603 · show in text ↑
e2

“unthinned control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel at 300 ppm judiciously thinned fruitlets (24.15 & 25.38%) in nectarine.

Treatment
300 ppm ethrele3
Outcome
fruitletse3
Direction
judiciously thinnede3
Value
24.15 & 25.38%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during 2009 and 2010 to study the influence of fruit thinning on growth, yield, proportion of different grades fruit and fruit quality of nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–180 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of 300 ppm ethrel judiciously thinned fruitlets (24.15 & 25.38%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel at 300 ppm improved fruit size and weight (89.90 & 92.75 g/fruit) in nectarine compared with other chemical treatments.

Organ / stage
fruitse4
Treatment
300 ppm ethrele3
Outcome
size and weighte4
Direction
improvede4
Value
89.90 & 92.75 g/fruite4
Comparator
other chemical treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during 2009 and 2010 to study the influence of fruit thinning on growth, yield, proportion of different grades fruit and fruit quality of nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–180 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of 300 ppm ethrel judiciously thinned fruitlets (24.15 & 25.38%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–721 · show in text ↑
e4

“improved size and weight (89.90 & 92.75 g/fruit) of fruits, proportion of ‘A’ and ‘B’ grades fruits without any adverse effect on total yield as compared to other chemical treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel at 300 ppm improved the proportion of A and B grade fruits in nectarine compared with other chemical treatments.

Organ / stage
fruitse4
Treatment
300 ppm ethrele3
Outcome
proportion of ‘A’ and ‘B’ grades fruitse4
Direction
improvede4
Comparator
other chemical treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during 2009 and 2010 to study the influence of fruit thinning on growth, yield, proportion of different grades fruit and fruit quality of nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–180 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of 300 ppm ethrel judiciously thinned fruitlets (24.15 & 25.38%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–721 · show in text ↑
e4

“improved size and weight (89.90 & 92.75 g/fruit) of fruits, proportion of ‘A’ and ‘B’ grades fruits without any adverse effect on total yield as compared to other chemical treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel at 300 ppm had no adverse effect on total yield in nectarine compared with other chemical treatments.

Treatment
300 ppm ethrele3
Outcome
total yielde4
Direction
without any adverse effecte4
Comparator
other chemical treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during 2009 and 2010 to study the influence of fruit thinning on growth, yield, proportion of different grades fruit and fruit quality of nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–180 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of 300 ppm ethrel judiciously thinned fruitlets (24.15 & 25.38%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–721 · show in text ↑
e4

“improved size and weight (89.90 & 92.75 g/fruit) of fruits, proportion of ‘A’ and ‘B’ grades fruits without any adverse effect on total yield as compared to other chemical treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel at 300 ppm significantly increased TSS (14.23%) in nectarine compared with control.

Treatment
Ethrel at 300 ppme5
Outcome
TSSe5
Direction
increasede5
Value
14.23e5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during 2009 and 2010 to study the influence of fruit thinning on growth, yield, proportion of different grades fruit and fruit quality of nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–180 · show in text ↑
e5

“Ethrel at 300 ppm and NAA at 60 ppm significantly increased TSS (14.23 & 14.31%), total and reducing sugars as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 60 ppm significantly increased TSS (14.31%) in nectarine compared with control.

Treatment
NAA at 60 ppme5
Outcome
TSSe5
Direction
increasede5
Value
14.31e5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during 2009 and 2010 to study the influence of fruit thinning on growth, yield, proportion of different grades fruit and fruit quality of nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–180 · show in text ↑
e5

“Ethrel at 300 ppm and NAA at 60 ppm significantly increased TSS (14.23 & 14.31%), total and reducing sugars as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel at 300 ppm significantly increased total and reducing sugars in nectarine compared with control.

Treatment
Ethrel at 300 ppme5
Outcome
total and reducing sugarse5
Direction
increasede5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during 2009 and 2010 to study the influence of fruit thinning on growth, yield, proportion of different grades fruit and fruit quality of nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–180 · show in text ↑
e5

“Ethrel at 300 ppm and NAA at 60 ppm significantly increased TSS (14.23 & 14.31%), total and reducing sugars as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 60 ppm significantly increased total and reducing sugars in nectarine compared with control.

Treatment
NAA at 60 ppme5
Outcome
total and reducing sugarse5
Direction
increasede5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during 2009 and 2010 to study the influence of fruit thinning on growth, yield, proportion of different grades fruit and fruit quality of nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–180 · show in text ↑
e5

“Ethrel at 300 ppm and NAA at 60 ppm significantly increased TSS (14.23 & 14.31%), total and reducing sugars as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The net return from the thinning trials was Rs. 668 and 982 per tree in 2009 and 2010.

Outcome
net returne6
Value
Rs. 668 and 982 per treee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during 2009 and 2010 to study the influence of fruit thinning on growth, yield, proportion of different grades fruit and fruit quality of nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–180 · show in text ↑
e6

“The net return of Rs. 668 and 982 per tree during 2009 and 2010, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit quality attributes were better with 300 ppm ethrel treatment in nectarine.

Treatment
300 ppm ethrele7
Outcome
fruit quality attributese7
Direction
bettere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during 2009 and 2010 to study the influence of fruit thinning on growth, yield, proportion of different grades fruit and fruit quality of nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–180 · show in text ↑
e7

“fruit quality attributes were also better with 300 ppm ethrel treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees sprayed with 60 ppm NAA attained the highest shoot length, tree volume and leaf area in nectarine.

Treatment
60 ppm NAAe7
Outcome
shoot length, tree volume and leaf areae7
Direction
higheste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during 2009 and 2010 to study the influence of fruit thinning on growth, yield, proportion of different grades fruit and fruit quality of nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–180 · show in text ↑
e7

“Trees sprayed with 60 ppm NAA attained highest shoot length, tree volume and leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–993 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

17 papers: 8 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: grain · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pruning · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 63 positive, 34 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.