Paper · 2007 · Journal of Food Quality

EFFICACY OF SOUR WHEY AS A SHELF‐LIFE ENHANCER: USE IN ANTIOXIDATIVE EDIBLE COATINGS OF CUT VEGETABLES AND FRUIT*

JINHAN SHON; ZAHUR U. HAQUE

11
claims
26
verbatim quotes
31
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT The effectiveness of edible coatings containing sour whey powder (SWP), compared with soy protein isolate (SPI) and calcium caseinate (CC), in reducing oxidative browning and moisture loss during storage (4C) of cut apples, potatoes, carrots, and onions was investigated. Oxidative discoloration, as determined by the Commission Internationale de I'Eclairage L * a * b * color scale, was significantly reduced ( P < 0.05) by treatments over a storage time of 120 min. Loss of lightness was reduced by CC, SPI and SWP coatings. These respectively showed 2.7, 3.3 and 1.5% change of L * value in coated apples as compared with 7.4% in the control . Browning in cut potatoes was significantly reduced from a 145.1% increase in the a * value of the control to 45.9, 37.0 and 30.3% increase for CC, SPI and SWP treatments, respectively. The b * values also reflected the effectiveness of SWP. The moisture barrier effect, tested over a period of 5 days at 4C, was significantly better for the treatments than control. SWP was the best and significantly reduced moisture loss in potatoes and carrots by 40 and 59%, respectively, over control. Cut onions did not show any treatment effect both in terms of off‐color development and moisture loss. The reasons for the excellent moisture barrier and antioxidative property of SWP were discussed. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS Oxidative degradation of fresh fruits and vegetables is a major problem faced by the industry today. Most of the fresh produce is grown in the southwestern part of the country, requiring days of transportation to retail outlets. As the educated consumer is highly health conscious, any effort in extending the shelf life will have to be nonchemical, and preferably natural. Because of small profit margins, the intervention must also be inexpensive. Millions of MT of sour whey, a by‐product of cottage whey manufacture, is wasted because of the lack of appropriate food applications. It is natural, nutritious and presently very inexpensive. Our research investigated the possibility of using this by‐product as a final wash to enhance the so‐called window of freshness of fresh produce and fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Edible coatings with sour whey powder, soy protein isolate or calcium caseinate significantly reduced oxidative browning of cut produce over 120 min storage.

Taxon
cut apples, potatoes, carrots, and onionse1
Treatment
edible coatings containing sour whey powder (SWP)e1
Outcome
oxidative browninge1
Direction
reducede2
Comparator
soy protein isolate (SPI) and calcium caseinate (CC)e1

Verbatim

e1

“The effectiveness of edible coatings containing sour whey powder (SWP), compared with soy protein isolate (SPI) and calcium caseinate (CC), in reducing oxidative browning and moisture loss during storage (4C) of cut apples, potatoes, carrots, and onions was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–279 · show in text ↑
e2

“was significantly reduced ( P < 0.05) by treatments over a storage time of 120 min”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium caseinate coating reduced the lightness loss of cut apples to 2.7 compared with 7.4 percent in the control.

Treatment
CCe2
Outcome
Loss of lightnesse2
Direction
reducede2
Value
2.7e3
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effectiveness of edible coatings containing sour whey powder (SWP), compared with soy protein isolate (SPI) and calcium caseinate (CC), in reducing oxidative browning and moisture loss during storage (4C) of cut apples, potatoes, carrots, and onions was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–279 · show in text ↑
e2

“Loss of lightness was reduced by CC, SPI and SWP coatings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–534 · show in text ↑
e3

“These respectively showed 2.7, 3.3 and 1.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–579 · show in text ↑
e4

“as compared with 7.4% in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soy protein isolate coating reduced the lightness loss of cut apples to 3.3 compared with 7.4 percent in the control.

Treatment
SPIe2
Outcome
Loss of lightnesse2
Direction
reducede2
Value
3.3e3
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effectiveness of edible coatings containing sour whey powder (SWP), compared with soy protein isolate (SPI) and calcium caseinate (CC), in reducing oxidative browning and moisture loss during storage (4C) of cut apples, potatoes, carrots, and onions was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–279 · show in text ↑
e2

“Loss of lightness was reduced by CC, SPI and SWP coatings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–534 · show in text ↑
e3

“These respectively showed 2.7, 3.3 and 1.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–579 · show in text ↑
e4

“as compared with 7.4% in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sour whey powder coating reduced the lightness loss of cut apples to 1.5 compared with 7.4 percent in the control.

Treatment
SWPe2
Outcome
Loss of lightnesse2
Direction
reducede2
Value
1.5e3
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effectiveness of edible coatings containing sour whey powder (SWP), compared with soy protein isolate (SPI) and calcium caseinate (CC), in reducing oxidative browning and moisture loss during storage (4C) of cut apples, potatoes, carrots, and onions was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–279 · show in text ↑
e2

“Loss of lightness was reduced by CC, SPI and SWP coatings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–534 · show in text ↑
e3

“These respectively showed 2.7, 3.3 and 1.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–579 · show in text ↑
e4

“as compared with 7.4% in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium caseinate coating reduced browning of cut potatoes to 45.9 percent increase in a* value from 145.1 percent in the control.

Taxon
cut potatoese6
Treatment
CCe7
Outcome
Browninge6
Direction
reducede6
Value
45.9e7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e6

“Browning in cut potatoes was significantly reduced from a 145.1% increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–729 · show in text ↑
e7

“to 45.9, 37.0 and 30.3% increase for CC, SPI and SWP treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soy protein isolate coating reduced browning of cut potatoes to a 37.0 percent increase in a* value.

Taxon
cut potatoese6
Treatment
SPIe7
Outcome
Browninge6
Direction
reducede6
Value
37.0e7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e6

“Browning in cut potatoes was significantly reduced from a 145.1% increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–729 · show in text ↑
e7

“to 45.9, 37.0 and 30.3% increase for CC, SPI and SWP treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sour whey powder coating reduced browning of cut potatoes to a 30.3 percent increase in a* value.

Taxon
cut potatoese6
Treatment
SWPe7
Outcome
Browninge6
Direction
reducede6
Value
30.3e7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e6

“Browning in cut potatoes was significantly reduced from a 145.1% increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–729 · show in text ↑
e7

“to 45.9, 37.0 and 30.3% increase for CC, SPI and SWP treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sour whey powder coating was the best at reducing moisture loss of cut potatoes, by 40 percent over control.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
SWPe0
Outcome
moisture losse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
40e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SWP was the best and significantly reduced moisture loss in potatoes and carrots by 40 and 59%, respectively, over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sour whey powder coating reduced moisture loss of cut carrots by 59 percent over control.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
SWPe0
Outcome
moisture losse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
59%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SWP was the best and significantly reduced moisture loss in potatoes and carrots by 40 and 59%, respectively, over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Edible coatings did not show any treatment effect on cut onions.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae2
Treatment
edible coatingse1
Outcome
treatment effecte2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effectiveness of edible coatings containing sour whey powder (SWP), compared with soy protein isolate (SPI) and calcium caseinate (CC), in reducing oxidative browning and moisture loss during storage (4C) of cut apples, potatoes, carrots, and onions was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–279 · show in text ↑
e2

“Cut onions did not show any treatment effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sour whey, soy protein and caseinate coatings gave a significantly better moisture barrier than control.

Taxon
cut apples, potatoes, carrots, and onionse1
Treatment
treatmentse2
Outcome
moisture barrier effecte2
Direction
bettere2
Comparator
controle2

Verbatim

e1

“The effectiveness of edible coatings containing sour whey powder (SWP), compared with soy protein isolate (SPI) and calcium caseinate (CC), in reducing oxidative browning and moisture loss during storage (4C) of cut apples, potatoes, carrots, and onions was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–279 · show in text ↑
e2

“The moisture barrier effect, tested over a period of 5 days at 4C, was significantly better for the treatments than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1020 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

botanical · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 21 positive, 8 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

botanical · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 36 positive, 3 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

botanical · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 65 positive, 5 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

botanical · disease · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.