Paper · 2000 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Water Use and Yield of Limited‐Irrigated and Dryland Corn

Charles A. Norwood

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
94
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Corn ( Zea mays L.) is grown on more irrigated hectares than any crop in the Great Plains. Much of this area is irrigated from the Ogallala aquifer, which is being depleted in some areas, particularly in the central and southern portions of the region. Research was conducted at Garden City, KS, from 1994 through 1997 to evaluate the effects of various combinations of irrigation, N rate, and plant population on water use and yield of corn and to determine if limited irrigation is a viable alternative to returning irrigated hectares to dryland in an area of declining groundwater. Treatments were zero, one, two, and three irrigations, each consisting of 150 mm of water, applied to corn grown with conventional tillage (CT) and no tillage (NT). Appropriate N rates and plant populations were used with each irrigation treatment to give the management systems S0, S1, S2, and S3. The single irrigation was at tassel (VT) and the two irrigation treatment was at VT and at the dough stage of grain fill (R4). Corn irrigated three times received a vegetative irrigation at the 9 to 10 leaf stage (V9) plus irrigations at VT and R4. Management system S1 increased yield by an average of 1.76 Mg ha −1 or 29%. On average S2 and S3 increased yields an additional 11 and 13%, respectively. No till increased yield and water‐use efficiency (WUE) in 2 of 4 yr. On average NT increased yield by 0.56 Mg ha −1 , and WUE by 0.96 kg ha −1 mm −1 . Conclusions are that corn will produce adequate yields with one or more irrigations; thus, limited irrigation combined with proper fertility and plant population is a viable alternative to dryland in an area of declining groundwater.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Management system S1 increased corn yield by an average of 1.76 Mg ha-1 or 29%.

Treatment
Management system S1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.76 Mg ha −1 or 29%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“Management system S1 increased yield by an average of 1.76 Mg ha −1 or 29%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1207 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Management system S2 increased corn yield by an additional 11%.

Treatment
S2e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“S2 and S3 increased yields an additional 11 and 13%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Management system S3 increased corn yield by an additional 13%.

Treatment
S3e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“S2 and S3 increased yields an additional 11 and 13%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No till increased corn yield in 2 of 4 years.

Treatment
No tille0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in 2 of 4 yre1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“No till increased yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1310 · show in text ↑
e1

“(WUE) in 2 of 4 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On average no till increased corn yield by 0.56 Mg ha-1.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.56 Mg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“On average NT increased yield by 0.56 Mg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On average no till increased water-use efficiency by 0.96 kg ha-1 mm-1.

Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.96 kg ha −1 mm −1e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“On average NT increased yield by 0.56 Mg ha −1 , and WUE by 0.96 kg ha −1 mm −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1435 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Corn produces adequate yields with one or more irrigations, so limited irrigation with proper fertility and plant population is a viable alternative to dryland where groundwater is declining.

Treatment
limited irrigatione0
Outcome
viable alternative to drylande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn will produce adequate yields with one or more irrigations; thus, limited irrigation combined with proper fertility and plant population is a viable alternative to dryland in an area of declining groundwater”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1670 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 110 positive, 45 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.