Paper · 2005 · Agronomy Journal

Potassium Fertilization Effects on Cotton Lint Yield, Yield Components, and Reniform Nematode Populations

W. T. Pettigrew; W. R. Meredith; L. D. Young

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
94
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) lint yields have not changed appreciably during the last decade. Because more and higher infestations of reniform nematodes ( Rotylenchulus reniformis ) have been identified in mid‐southern USA fields, this nematode might be a mitigating factor in the cotton yield stagnation. The objectives were to determine how varying rates of K fertilization interacted with different cotton genotypes to influence dry matter partitioning, lint yield, fiber quality, and reniform nematode populations. Nine cotton genotypes were grown in the field under two levels of K fertilization (0 and 112 kg K ha −1 ) and two levels of aldicarb [2‐methyl‐2‐(methylthio)propionaldehyde 0 ‐methylcarbamoyloxime] application (0 and 1.68 kg a.i. ha −1 ) from 1999 through 2001. Reniform nematode numbers and aboveground dry matter partitioning were determined at various times in the growing season. Lint yield, yield components, and fiber quality were determined at the end of the season. Cotton grown with K fertilization hosted a 12% larger post‐harvest population of reniform nematode than the unfertilized control plants. Plants grown without K fertilization averaged a 10% greater specific leaf weight than the K fertilized plants. Of the 9 genotypes grown, only PayMaster 1218BR increased lint yield (10%) in response to K fertilization. An interaction between aldicarb application and K fertilization for lint yield during the 2000 growing season indicated that both reniform nematode parasitism and insufficient K fertilization may impose limitations to lint yield production. Large reinform nematode populations may be suppressing the yield response to K fertilization. Production practices that encourage robust plant growth may enhance proliferation of existing reniform nematode populations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium-fertilized cotton hosted a 12% larger post-harvest reniform nematode population than unfertilized plants.

Treatment
K fertilizatione0
Interactor
reniform nematodee0pest
Outcome
post‐harvest population of reniform nematodee0
Direction
largere0
Value
12%e0
Comparator
unfertilized control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton grown with K fertilization hosted a 12% larger post‐harvest population of reniform nematode than the unfertilized control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton without potassium fertilization had 10% greater specific leaf weight than fertilized plants.

Treatment
without K fertilizatione0
Outcome
specific leaf weighte0
Direction
greatere0
Value
10%e0
Comparator
K fertilized plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants grown without K fertilization averaged a 10% greater specific leaf weight than the K fertilized plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1243 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only PayMaster 1218BR among nine genotypes increased lint yield by 10% with potassium fertilization.

Material
PayMaster 1218BRe0
Treatment
K fertilizatione0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of the 9 genotypes grown, only PayMaster 1218BR increased lint yield (10%) in response to K fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aldicarb application interacted with potassium fertilization for cotton lint yield in 2000.

Treatment
aldicarb application and K fertilizatione0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Qualifier
2000 growing seasone0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An interaction between aldicarb application and K fertilization for lint yield during the 2000 growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Large reniform nematode populations may suppress cotton yield response to potassium fertilization.

Interactor
reinform nematodee0pest
Outcome
yield response to K fertilizatione0
Direction
suppressinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Large reinform nematode populations may be suppressing the yield response to K fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Production practices encouraging robust cotton growth may enhance reniform nematode proliferation.

Interactor
reniform nematodee0pest
Outcome
proliferation of existing reniform nematode populationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Production practices that encourage robust plant growth may enhance proliferation of existing reniform nematode populations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1686–1810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑

fertilization · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

129 papers: 82 positive, 47 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

125 papers more in this group

See all 129 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.