Paper · 1996 · Crop Protection

Insecticidal control of cereal aphids and its impact on the epidemiology of the barley yellow dwarf luteoviruses

S.M. Gray; G.C. Bergstrom; R. Vaughan; et al.

18
claims
37
verbatim quotes
55
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Imidacloprid is a seed-applied nitroguanidine insecticide that has both contact and long-lasting systemic properties. Its direct effects on cereal aphid populations and indirect effects on barley yellow dwarf luteovirus (BYDV) incidence were examined in laboratory and field studies. Adult longevity and fecundity of three aphid species caged on various aged, imidacloprid-treated oat or wheat plants was reduced, although the quantitative efficacy of the compound differed among aphid species. The transmission efficiency of BYDV by aphids to imidacloprid-treated plants was lower, relative to nontreated plants, when plants were 10 days old, but similar to nontreated when plants were 24 days old. In three years of field trials using winter wheat and two years using spring oat, aphid populations were reduced significantly in imidacloprid-treated plots relative to nontreated plots. Although the number of alighting alate aphids did not differ significantly between imidacloprid-treated or nontreated plots, the number of apterous aphids remained significantly lower in the treated plots for the majority of the growing season. BYDV epidemics did not develop in spring oat in either of the two years. BYDV epidemics did develop in the fall in the emerging winter wheat crop. Rhopalosiphum maidis was the predominant aphid migrating into the 1991–1992 crop. The incidence of the BYDV-RMV serotype was three times higher in nontreated plots than in imidacloprid-treated plots. In the 1992–1993 and 1994–1995 seasons, R. maidis and R. padi were the predominant aphids migrating into the crop, although R. padi was the predominant colonizing aphid. The incidence of BYDV-RMV was similar in imidacloprid treated and nontreated plots in 1992–1993, but the incidence of the BYDV-PAV serotype was significantly less in the treated plots. In 1994–1995, the incidence of both BYDV-PAV and BYDV-RMV was higher in the nontreated plots than in the imidacloprid-treated plots. Imidacloprid offers several advantages both in terms of its long-lasting systemic activity and its mode of applicaiton. As a seed treatment, the amount of material applied is minimized, there is little waste and the environmental impacts are reduced. The effectiveness of the compound at reducing the fecundity or reproductive rate of several aphid species may be advantageous in controlling secondary spread of viruses. However, the contact properties of the compound, important in repelling aphids or preventing phloem feeding, may be short-lived, thus reducing its effectiveness in preventing primary spread of the virus into the crop, especially under high aphid and inoculum pressure.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid-treated oat or wheat reduced adult longevity of three caged aphid species.

Treatment
imidacloprid-treatede0
Interactor
aphid speciese0pest
Outcome
Adult longevitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
nontreated plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adult longevity and fecundity of three aphid species caged on various aged, imidacloprid-treated oat or wheat plants was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–412 · show in text ↑
e1

“relative to nontreated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid-treated oat or wheat reduced fecundity of three caged aphid species.

Treatment
imidacloprid-treatede0
Interactor
aphid speciese0pest
Outcome
fecundity of three aphid speciese0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
nontreated plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adult longevity and fecundity of three aphid species caged on various aged, imidacloprid-treated oat or wheat plants was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–412 · show in text ↑
e1

“relative to nontreated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–612 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quantitative imidacloprid efficacy differed among aphid species.

Interactor
aphid speciese0pest
Outcome
quantitative efficacy of the compound differed among aphid speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the quantitative efficacy of the compound differed among aphid species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–493 · show in text ↑
e1

“oat or wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BYDV transmission efficiency to treated plants was lower at 10 days of plant age.

Treatment
imidacloprid-treatede0
Interactor
BYDVBarley yellow dwarf viruse0pathogen
Second interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
transmission efficiency of BYDVe0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
when plants were 10 days olde0
Comparator
nontreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Barley yellow dwarf virus
Barley yellow dwarf virus · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The transmission efficiency of BYDV by aphids to imidacloprid-treated plants was lower, relative to nontreated plants, when plants were 10 days old”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley yellow dwarf luteoviruses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“oat or wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BYDV transmission efficiency to treated plants was similar to nontreated plants at 24 days.

Treatment
imidacloprid-treatede1
Interactor
BYDVBarley yellow dwarf viruse1pathogen
Second interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae1pest
Outcome
transmission efficiency of BYDVe1
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
when plants were 24 days olde0
Comparator
nontreatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Barley yellow dwarf virus
Barley yellow dwarf virus · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but similar to nontreated when plants were 24 days old”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–698 · show in text ↑
e1

“The transmission efficiency of BYDV by aphids to imidacloprid-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–571 · show in text ↑
e2

“oat or wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Field aphid populations were significantly lower in treated winter wheat and spring oat plots.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
imidacloprid-treated plotse0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid populationse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
nontreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In three years of field trials using winter wheat and two years using spring oat, aphid populations were reduced significantly in imidacloprid-treated plots relative to nontreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Alighting alate aphid numbers did not differ significantly between treated and untreated plots.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
imidacloprid-treatede0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
number of alighting alate aphidse0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
nontreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of alighting alate aphids did not differ significantly between imidacloprid-treated or nontreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1010 · show in text ↑
e1

“field trials using winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Apterous aphid numbers stayed significantly lower in treated plots for most of the season.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
treated plotse0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
number of apterous aphidse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
nontreated plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of apterous aphids remained significantly lower in the treated plots for the majority of the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1130 · show in text ↑
e1

“relative to nontreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–885 · show in text ↑
e2

“field trials using winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–749 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BYDV epidemics did not develop in spring oat in either year.

Taxon
spring oatAvena sativae0
Interactor
BYDVBarley yellow dwarf viruse0pathogen
Outcome
BYDV epidemics did not develope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Barley yellow dwarf virus
Barley yellow dwarf virus · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BYDV epidemics did not develop in spring oat in either of the two years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1203 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BYDV epidemics developed in emerging winter wheat in fall.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Interactor
BYDVBarley yellow dwarf viruse0pathogen
Outcome
BYDV epidemics did develope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Barley yellow dwarf virus
Barley yellow dwarf virus · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BYDV epidemics did develop in the fall in the emerging winter wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1277 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhopalosiphum maidis predominated among aphids entering the 1991–1992 crop.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Interactor
Rhopalosiphum maidisRhopalosiphum maidise0pest
Outcome
predominant aphid migrating into the 1991–1992 crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhopalosiphum maidis
Rhopalosiphum maidis · InteractorJesse Rorabaugh · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhopalosiphum maidis was the predominant aphid migrating into the 1991–1992 crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1359 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BYDV-RMV incidence was three times higher in untreated plots in 1991–1992.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
imidacloprid-treated plotse0
Interactor
BYDV-RMVe0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of the BYDV-RMV serotypee0
Direction
highere0
Value
three timese0
Comparator
nontreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The incidence of the BYDV-RMV serotype was three times higher in nontreated plots than in imidacloprid-treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1477 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1277 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. maidis and R. padi predominated among migrating aphids in 1992–1993 and 1994–1995.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Interactor
R. maidisRhopalosiphum maidise0pest
Second interactor
R. padiRhopalosiphum padie0pest
Outcome
predominant aphids migrating into the crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhopalosiphum maidis
Rhopalosiphum maidis · InteractorJesse Rorabaugh · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhopalosiphum padi
Rhopalosiphum padi · Second interactorSkvarla M, Kramer M, Owen CL, Miller GL (2020) Reexamination of Rhopalosiphum (Hemiptera: Aphididae) using linear discriminant analysis to determine the validit · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the 1992–1993 and 1994–1995 seasons, R. maidis and R. padi were the predominant aphids migrating into the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1592 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1277 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. padi predominated among colonizing aphids in those seasons.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Interactor
R. padiRhopalosiphum padie0pest
Outcome
predominant colonizing aphide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhopalosiphum padi
Rhopalosiphum padi · InteractorSkvarla M, Kramer M, Owen CL, Miller GL (2020) Reexamination of Rhopalosiphum (Hemiptera: Aphididae) using linear discriminant analysis to determine the validit · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“R. padi was the predominant colonizing aphid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1647 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BYDV-RMV incidence was similar in treated and untreated plots in 1992–1993.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
imidacloprid treatede0
Interactor
BYDV-RMVe0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of BYDV-RMVe0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
nontreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The incidence of BYDV-RMV was similar in imidacloprid treated and nontreated plots in 1992–1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1744 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BYDV-PAV incidence was significantly lower in treated plots in 1992–1993.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
treated plotse0
Interactor
BYDV-PAVe0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of the BYDV-PAV serotypee0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
nontreated plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the incidence of the BYDV-PAV serotype was significantly less in the treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1750–1832 · show in text ↑
e1

“nontreated plots in 1992–1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1744 · show in text ↑
e2

“winter wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BYDV-PAV incidence was higher in untreated than treated plots in 1994–1995.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
imidacloprid-treated plotse0
Interactor
BYDV-PAVe0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of both BYDV-PAV and BYDV-RMVe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
nontreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1994–1995, the incidence of both BYDV-PAV and BYDV-RMV was higher in the nontreated plots than in the imidacloprid-treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–1965 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BYDV-RMV incidence was higher in untreated than treated plots in 1994–1995.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
imidacloprid-treated plotse0
Interactor
BYDV-RMVe0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of both BYDV-PAV and BYDV-RMVe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
nontreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1994–1995, the incidence of both BYDV-PAV and BYDV-RMV was higher in the nontreated plots than in the imidacloprid-treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–1965 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1277 · show in text ↑

imidacloprid · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.