Paper · 1997 · Plant Disease

Evaluation of an Aeroponics System to Screen Maize Genotypes for Resistance toFusarium graminearumSeedling Blight

Lindsey J. du Toit; H. Walker Kirby; Wayne L. Pedersen

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A noncirculating aeroponics system was evaluated as a method for rapid screening of maize genotypes for resistance to Fusarium graminearum seedling blight/root rot. The system allows for nondestructive, repetitive sampling of seedlings for assessing disease progress and seedling growth. Shoot growth and root rot were assessed at 3-day intervals, and final shoot and root dry weight were determined 15 days after inoculation. The nine hybrids screened differed in severity of root rot as early as 6 days after inoculation, indicating differences in resistance to F. graminearum. Inoculation did not always significantly affect shoot growth, root dry weight, or shoot dry weight, but differences in these agronomic traits were observed among hybrids.LH119 × LH51 and Pioneer Brand 3379 showed the greatest resistance to root rot. Area under-disease progress curve and a critical stage of disease assessment (9 days after inoculation) gave similar rankings of hybrids for root rot resistance, indicating that a single disease assessment (versus multiple assessments) may be adequate in screening for resistance with this aeroponics system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nine maize hybrids differed in root rot severity as early as 6 days after F. graminearum inoculation.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
nine hybridse1
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume1pathogen
Outcome
severity of root rote1
Qualifier
as early as 6 days after inoculatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Screen Maize Genotypes for Resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“The nine hybrids screened differed in severity of root rot as early as 6 days after inoculation, indicating differences in resistance to F. graminearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with F. graminearum did not always significantly affect shoot growth, root dry weight or shoot dry weight.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Inoculatione2
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume1pathogen
Outcome
shoot growth, root dry weight, or shoot dry weighte2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Screen Maize Genotypes for Resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“The nine hybrids screened differed in severity of root rot as early as 6 days after inoculation, indicating differences in resistance to F. graminearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–578 · show in text ↑
e2

“Inoculation did not always significantly affect shoot growth, root dry weight, or shoot dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–678 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in agronomic traits were observed among maize hybrids.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
hybridse3
Outcome
agronomic traitse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Screen Maize Genotypes for Resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–75 · show in text ↑
e3

“differences in these agronomic traits were observed among hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–749 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LH119 × LH51 and Pioneer Brand 3379 showed the greatest resistance to root rot among the hybrids tested.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
LH119 × LH51 and Pioneer Brand 3379e4
Outcome
resistance to root rote4
Qualifier
greateste4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Screen Maize Genotypes for Resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–75 · show in text ↑
e4

“LH119 × LH51 and Pioneer Brand 3379 showed the greatest resistance to root rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–828 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AUDPC and a single assessment at 9 days after inoculation gave similar rankings of hybrids for root rot resistance.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
rankings of hybrids for root rot resistancee5
Value
9 days after inoculatione5
Qualifier
similar rankingse5
Comparator
Area under-disease progress curvee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Screen Maize Genotypes for Resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–75 · show in text ↑
e5

“Area under-disease progress curve and a critical stage of disease assessment (9 days after inoculation) gave similar rankings of hybrids for root rot resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–990 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A single disease assessment may be adequate for screening maize for resistance in this aeroponics system (author recommendation).

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
screening for resistancee6
Qualifier
a single disease assessment (versus multiple assessments)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Screen Maize Genotypes for Resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–75 · show in text ↑
e6

“a single disease assessment (versus multiple assessments) may be adequate in screening for resistance with this aeroponics system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1137 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Fusarium graminearum · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.