Paper · 2010 · The Scientific World JOURNAL

The Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Inoculation and Mulch of Contrasting Chemical Composition on the Yield of Cassava under Humid Tropical Conditions

Iniobong E. Okon; M. G. Solomon; O. Osonubi

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF), Glomus deserticola, and leaf mulch from Gliricidia sepium and Senna siamea on the yield of cassava (Manihot esculenta) in a degraded alfisol of southwestern Nigeria was investigated. Inoculation in conjunction with mulching increased cassava tuber yield by 40-278% over the control. The highest yield was obtained with G. sepium and S. siamea mulch applied together in equal proportions. The results are explained in the light of the growth-enhancing effects of AMF, encouraged by the ameliorating effects of mulch on the soil structure and nutrient contents.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus deserticola combined with mulch increased cassava tuber yield by 40-278% over the control.

Organ / stage
tubere2
Treatment
Inoculation in conjunction with mulchinge2
Interactor
Glomus deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae1symbiont
Outcome
cassava tuber yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
40-278%e2
Comparator
the controle2
Setting
degraded alfisol of southwestern Nigeriae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF), Glomus deserticola, and leaf mulch from Gliricidia sepium and Senna siamea on the yield of cassava (Manihot esculenta) in a degraded alfisol of southwestern Nigeria was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–235 · show in text ↑
e2

“Inoculation in conjunction with mulching increased cassava tuber yield by 40-278% over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava yield was highest with Gliricidia sepium and Senna siamea mulch applied together in equal proportions.

Treatment
G. sepium and S. siamea mulch applied together in equal proportionse3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF), Glomus deserticola, and leaf mulch from Gliricidia sepium and Senna siamea on the yield of cassava (Manihot esculenta) in a degraded alfisol of southwestern Nigeria was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–235 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest yield was obtained with G. sepium and S. siamea mulch applied together in equal proportions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–440 · show in text ↑

Senna siamea · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Gliricidia sepium · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mulching · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results differ

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.