Abstract
Protein and oil contents of soybean varieties were significantly affected by planting date and plant density. Late planted crop gave more protein content than early planted crop, while an inverse relationship was found for oil content. Lower plant density of 200 thousand plants haG 1 gave significantly more protein content than higher plant densities of 400 and 600 thousand plants haG 1 and the same response was observed for oil content but the difference among the plant densities did not reach the 5% significance level. Epps produced more protein and oil contents than William-82. There was no effect of plant density on Oil concentration in seeds of William -82, however Oil concentration in seeds of Epps decreased with increase in plant density, indicating differential response of Oil concentration in seeds of the two soybean varieties.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Late planting increased soybean protein content relative to early planting.
- Taxon
- Soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- Late planted crope0
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- early planted crope0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Late planted crop gave more protein content than early planted crop”
t0“Soybean Varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Late planting reduced soybean oil content relative to early planting.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- Late planted crope1
- Outcome
- oil contente0
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede0
- Comparator
- early planted crope1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“while an inverse relationship was found for oil content”
e1“Late planted crop gave more protein content than early planted crop”
t0“Soybean Varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Density of 200 thousand plants haG 1 produced significantly more protein than densities of 400 and 600 thousand plants haG 1.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- 200 thousand plants haG 1e0
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- 400 and 600 thousand plants haG 1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Lower plant density of 200 thousand plants haG 1 gave significantly more protein content than higher plant densities of 400 and 600 thousand plants haG 1”
t0“Soybean Varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Lower density gave more oil content, but the density difference did not reach 5% significance.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- 200 thousand plants haG 1e1
- Outcome
- oil contente0
- Direction
- moree1
- Comparator
- 400 and 600 thousand plants haG 1e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the same response was observed for oil content but the difference among the plant densities did not reach the 5% significance level”
e1“Lower plant density of 200 thousand plants haG 1 gave significantly more protein content than higher plant densities of 400 and 600 thousand plants haG 1”
t0“Soybean Varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Epps had higher protein content than William-82.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Epps produced more protein and oil contents than William-82”
t0“Soybean Varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Epps had higher oil content than William-82.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Epps produced more protein and oil contents than William-82”
t0“Soybean Varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant density did not affect seed oil concentration in William -82.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Material
- William -82e0
- Treatment
- plant densitye0
- Outcome
- Oil concentration in seedse0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was no effect of plant density on Oil concentration in seeds of William -82”
t0“Soybean Varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed oil concentration in Epps declined as plant density rose.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Material
- Eppse0
- Treatment
- plant densitye0
- Outcome
- Oil concentration in seedse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Oil concentration in seeds of Epps decreased with increase in plant density”
t0“Soybean Varieties”
The same questions in other papers
density · quality: oil · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →sowing time · quality: protein · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →sowing time · quality: oil · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.