Paper · 1991 · Plant Pathology

Pre‐ and post‐harvest control of mango anthracnose in the Philippines

J. C. DODD; R. BUGANTE; I. KOOMEN; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
37
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two field trials were conducted in the Philippines in successive years to compare the effectiveness of different pre‐ and post‐harvest treatments on the development of anthracnose on mango fruits caused by Colletoirichum gloeosporioides. In one experiment, the pre‐harvest application of benomyl (250 mg/l a.i.) significantly reduced the number of conidia sampled in tree canopies compared with control trees (no fungicide) and was associated with a significant reduction in the post‐harvest development of anthracnose on fruits. A hot‐benomyl dip (850 mg/l a.i. at 52 55 C for 10 min) completely eradicated anthracnose on fruit treated on the day of harvest. In a second experiment, pre‐harvest applications of prochloraz (500 mg/l a.i.) either within a pre‐planned spray schedule or applied strategically (when 18 h or more continual leaf wetness was recorded by a sensor placed within a tree canopy) gave the best control of anthracnose on fruits. A hot‐benomyl dip was again the most effective post‐harvest treatment for fruit treated on the day of harvest and on the day after. There was no significant difference, however, between hot‐benomyl dips or prochloraz dips (500 mg/l a.i. for 10 min) at ambient temperatures when fruit were treated on the third day after harvest. The implications of these results for the production and treatment of Carabao mangoes in the Philippines are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-harvest benomyl significantly reduced conidia sampled in mango tree canopies compared with untreated trees.

Treatment
pre‐harvest application of benomyl (250 mg/l a.i.)e1
Interactor
Colletoirichum gloeosporioidese0pathogen
Outcome
number of conidia sampled in tree canopiese1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
control trees (no fungicide)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“anthracnose on mango fruits caused by Colletoirichum gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–236 · show in text ↑
e1

“the pre‐harvest application of benomyl (250 mg/l a.i.) significantly reduced the number of conidia sampled in tree canopies compared with control trees (no fungicide) and was associated with a significant reduction in the post‐harvest development of anthracnose on fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-harvest benomyl was associated with a significant reduction in post-harvest anthracnose on mango fruits.

Treatment
pre‐harvest application of benomyl (250 mg/l a.i.)e1
Interactor
Colletoirichum gloeosporioidese0pathogen
Outcome
post‐harvest development of anthracnose on fruitse1
Direction
reductione1
Comparator
control trees (no fungicide)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“anthracnose on mango fruits caused by Colletoirichum gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–236 · show in text ↑
e1

“the pre‐harvest application of benomyl (250 mg/l a.i.) significantly reduced the number of conidia sampled in tree canopies compared with control trees (no fungicide) and was associated with a significant reduction in the post‐harvest development of anthracnose on fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A hot-benomyl dip completely eradicated anthracnose on mango fruit treated on the day of harvest.

Treatment
hot‐benomyl dip (850 mg/l a.i. at 52 55 C for 10 min)e2
Outcome
anthracnose on fruit treated on the day of harveste2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Qualifier
completely eradicatede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“anthracnose on mango fruits caused by Colletoirichum gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–236 · show in text ↑
e2

“A hot‐benomyl dip (850 mg/l a.i. at 52 55 C for 10 min) completely eradicated anthracnose on fruit treated on the day of harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-harvest prochloraz applied within a pre-planned spray schedule gave the best control of mango anthracnose.

Treatment
pre‐harvest applications of prochloraz (500 mg/l a.i.)e3
Outcome
control of anthracnose on fruitse3
Direction
beste3
Qualifier
within a pre‐planned spray schedulee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“anthracnose on mango fruits caused by Colletoirichum gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–236 · show in text ↑
e3

“pre‐harvest applications of prochloraz (500 mg/l a.i.) either within a pre‐planned spray schedule or applied strategically (when 18 h or more continual leaf wetness was recorded by a sensor placed within a tree canopy) gave the best control of anthracnose on fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-harvest prochloraz applied strategically, when leaf wetness was 18 h or more, gave the best control of mango anthracnose.

Treatment
pre‐harvest applications of prochloraz (500 mg/l a.i.)e3
Outcome
control of anthracnose on fruitse3
Direction
beste3
Qualifier
applied strategically (when 18 h or more continual leaf wetness was recorded by a sensor placed within a tree canopy)e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“anthracnose on mango fruits caused by Colletoirichum gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–236 · show in text ↑
e3

“pre‐harvest applications of prochloraz (500 mg/l a.i.) either within a pre‐planned spray schedule or applied strategically (when 18 h or more continual leaf wetness was recorded by a sensor placed within a tree canopy) gave the best control of anthracnose on fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A hot-benomyl dip was the most effective post-harvest treatment for mango fruit treated on the day of harvest and the day after.

Treatment
hot‐benomyl dipe4
Outcome
effectivee4
Direction
most effectivee4
Qualifier
for fruit treated on the day of harvest and on the day aftere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“anthracnose on mango fruits caused by Colletoirichum gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–236 · show in text ↑
e4

“A hot‐benomyl dip was again the most effective post‐harvest treatment for fruit treated on the day of harvest and on the day after”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot-benomyl dips and prochloraz dips at ambient temperature gave no significant difference when fruit were treated on the third day after harvest.

Treatment
prochloraz dips (500 mg/l a.i. for 10 min)e5
Outcome
significant differencee5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5
Qualifier
at ambient temperatures when fruit were treated on the third day after harveste5
Comparator
hot‐benomyl dipse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“anthracnose on mango fruits caused by Colletoirichum gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–236 · show in text ↑
e5

“There was no significant difference, however, between hot‐benomyl dips or prochloraz dips (500 mg/l a.i. for 10 min) at ambient temperatures when fruit were treated on the third day after harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1278 · show in text ↑

benomyl · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

prochloraz · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.