Abstract
Two field trials were conducted in the Philippines in successive years to compare the effectiveness of different pre‐ and post‐harvest treatments on the development of anthracnose on mango fruits caused by Colletoirichum gloeosporioides. In one experiment, the pre‐harvest application of benomyl (250 mg/l a.i.) significantly reduced the number of conidia sampled in tree canopies compared with control trees (no fungicide) and was associated with a significant reduction in the post‐harvest development of anthracnose on fruits. A hot‐benomyl dip (850 mg/l a.i. at 52 55 C for 10 min) completely eradicated anthracnose on fruit treated on the day of harvest. In a second experiment, pre‐harvest applications of prochloraz (500 mg/l a.i.) either within a pre‐planned spray schedule or applied strategically (when 18 h or more continual leaf wetness was recorded by a sensor placed within a tree canopy) gave the best control of anthracnose on fruits. A hot‐benomyl dip was again the most effective post‐harvest treatment for fruit treated on the day of harvest and on the day after. There was no significant difference, however, between hot‐benomyl dips or prochloraz dips (500 mg/l a.i. for 10 min) at ambient temperatures when fruit were treated on the third day after harvest. The implications of these results for the production and treatment of Carabao mangoes in the Philippines are discussed.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Pre-harvest benomyl significantly reduced conidia sampled in mango tree canopies compared with untreated trees.
- Taxon
- mango
Mangifera indicae0 - Treatment
- pre‐harvest application of benomyl (250 mg/l a.i.)e1
- Interactor
- Colletoirichum gloeosporioidese0pathogen
- Outcome
- number of conidia sampled in tree canopiese1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Comparator
- control trees (no fungicide)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“anthracnose on mango fruits caused by Colletoirichum gloeosporioides”
e1“the pre‐harvest application of benomyl (250 mg/l a.i.) significantly reduced the number of conidia sampled in tree canopies compared with control trees (no fungicide) and was associated with a significant reduction in the post‐harvest development of anthracnose on fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
Pre-harvest benomyl was associated with a significant reduction in post-harvest anthracnose on mango fruits.
- Taxon
- mango
Mangifera indicae0 - Treatment
- pre‐harvest application of benomyl (250 mg/l a.i.)e1
- Interactor
- Colletoirichum gloeosporioidese0pathogen
- Outcome
- post‐harvest development of anthracnose on fruitse1
- Direction
- reductione1
- Comparator
- control trees (no fungicide)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“anthracnose on mango fruits caused by Colletoirichum gloeosporioides”
e1“the pre‐harvest application of benomyl (250 mg/l a.i.) significantly reduced the number of conidia sampled in tree canopies compared with control trees (no fungicide) and was associated with a significant reduction in the post‐harvest development of anthracnose on fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
A hot-benomyl dip completely eradicated anthracnose on mango fruit treated on the day of harvest.
- Taxon
- mango
Mangifera indicae0 - Treatment
- hot‐benomyl dip (850 mg/l a.i. at 52 55 C for 10 min)e2
- Outcome
- anthracnose on fruit treated on the day of harveste2
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede2
- Qualifier
- completely eradicatede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“anthracnose on mango fruits caused by Colletoirichum gloeosporioides”
e2“A hot‐benomyl dip (850 mg/l a.i. at 52 55 C for 10 min) completely eradicated anthracnose on fruit treated on the day of harvest”
Claim · model-written summary
Pre-harvest prochloraz applied within a pre-planned spray schedule gave the best control of mango anthracnose.
- Taxon
- mango
Mangifera indicae0 - Treatment
- pre‐harvest applications of prochloraz (500 mg/l a.i.)e3
- Outcome
- control of anthracnose on fruitse3
- Direction
- beste3
- Qualifier
- within a pre‐planned spray schedulee3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“anthracnose on mango fruits caused by Colletoirichum gloeosporioides”
e3“pre‐harvest applications of prochloraz (500 mg/l a.i.) either within a pre‐planned spray schedule or applied strategically (when 18 h or more continual leaf wetness was recorded by a sensor placed within a tree canopy) gave the best control of anthracnose on fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
Pre-harvest prochloraz applied strategically, when leaf wetness was 18 h or more, gave the best control of mango anthracnose.
- Taxon
- mango
Mangifera indicae0 - Treatment
- pre‐harvest applications of prochloraz (500 mg/l a.i.)e3
- Outcome
- control of anthracnose on fruitse3
- Direction
- beste3
- Qualifier
- applied strategically (when 18 h or more continual leaf wetness was recorded by a sensor placed within a tree canopy)e3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“anthracnose on mango fruits caused by Colletoirichum gloeosporioides”
e3“pre‐harvest applications of prochloraz (500 mg/l a.i.) either within a pre‐planned spray schedule or applied strategically (when 18 h or more continual leaf wetness was recorded by a sensor placed within a tree canopy) gave the best control of anthracnose on fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
A hot-benomyl dip was the most effective post-harvest treatment for mango fruit treated on the day of harvest and the day after.
- Taxon
- mango
Mangifera indicae0 - Treatment
- hot‐benomyl dipe4
- Outcome
- effectivee4
- Direction
- most effectivee4
- Qualifier
- for fruit treated on the day of harvest and on the day aftere4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“anthracnose on mango fruits caused by Colletoirichum gloeosporioides”
e4“A hot‐benomyl dip was again the most effective post‐harvest treatment for fruit treated on the day of harvest and on the day after”
Claim · model-written summary
Hot-benomyl dips and prochloraz dips at ambient temperature gave no significant difference when fruit were treated on the third day after harvest.
- Taxon
- mango
Mangifera indicae0 - Treatment
- prochloraz dips (500 mg/l a.i. for 10 min)e5
- Outcome
- significant differencee5
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede5
- Qualifier
- at ambient temperatures when fruit were treated on the third day after harveste5
- Comparator
- hot‐benomyl dipse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“anthracnose on mango fruits caused by Colletoirichum gloeosporioides”
e5“There was no significant difference, however, between hot‐benomyl dips or prochloraz dips (500 mg/l a.i. for 10 min) at ambient temperatures when fruit were treated on the third day after harvest”
The same questions in other papers
benomyl · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →prochloraz · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.