Paper · 2014 · Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

Evaluation of persistence and effectiveness of bacterial cell suspensions and culture filtrates againstM. incognitaon brinjal

H.M. Aatif; N. Javed; S.A. Khan; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Keeping in view the staid health and ecological apprehensions coupled with the use of pesticides, entomopathogenic nematodes have the potential to supersede pesticides for the management of various pests. Brinjal plants are the most seriously affected by Meloidogyne incognita. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the persistence effectiveness of bacterial cell suspensions (Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus spp.) and their culture filtrates in soil up to 7, 14 and 21 days and their response against M. incognita as a source of biological control for nematode management. In a life cycle study, Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus spp., isolated from Steinernema asiaticum and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, were proved more effective in influencing the life cycle of RKNs. It was found that all the treatments of bacterial cell suspensions and their culture filtrates at all persistent times proved effective in reducing the number of females and egg masses as compared to control. It delayed penetration of nematode juveniles (J2) into host roots. It was concluded that persistence effectiveness of bacteria and their metabolites decreased in soil with time.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus were more effective in influencing root-knot nematode life cycles.

Treatment
Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus spp.e0
Interactor
RKNse0pest
Second interactor
Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus spp.XenorhabdusPhotorhabduse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
life cycle of RKNse0
Direction
more effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Photorhabdus
Photorhabdus · Second interactorElizabeth Gerdes1, Devang Upadhyay, Sivanadane Mandjiny, Rebecca Bullard-Dillard, Meredith Storms, Michael Menefee, Leonard D. Holmes · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus spp., isolated from Steinernema asiaticum and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, were proved more effective in influencing the life cycle of RKNs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial suspensions and filtrates reduced nematode number of females relative to control at all tested persistence times.

Treatment
bacterial cell suspensions and their culture filtratese0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
number of femalese0
Direction
reducinge0
Qualifier
all persistent timese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the treatments of bacterial cell suspensions and their culture filtrates at all persistent times proved effective in reducing the number of females and egg masses as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“M. incognitaon brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial suspensions and filtrates reduced nematode egg masses relative to control at all tested persistence times.

Treatment
bacterial cell suspensions and their culture filtratese0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
egg massese0
Direction
reducinge0
Qualifier
all persistent timese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the treatments of bacterial cell suspensions and their culture filtrates at all persistent times proved effective in reducing the number of females and egg masses as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“M. incognitaon brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial treatment delayed juvenile nematode penetration into brinjal roots.

Treatment
bacterial cell suspensions and culture filtratest0
Interactor
nematode juveniles (J2)e0pest
Outcome
penetration of nematode juveniles (J2) into host rootse0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It delayed penetration of nematode juveniles (J2) into host roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1051 · show in text ↑
t0

“bacterial cell suspensions and culture filtrates againstM. incognitaon brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial and metabolite effectiveness declined in soil over time.

Interactor
bacteriaBacteriae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
persistence effectivenesse0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“persistence effectiveness of bacteria and their metabolites decreased in soil with time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–125 · show in text ↑

pathogen product · pest · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pathogen product · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.