Paper · 2014 · Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science

Spinach-irrigating and fertilizing for optimum quality, quantity, and economy

Jinxiu Zhang; Yubo Yue; Zhimin Sha; et al.

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The increasing scarcity of water for irrigation and environmental pollution due to excessive use of fertilizers are the important problems in vegetable production. A field experiment with combination of three levels of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization was employed to optimize the irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer usage of spinach. Traits, yields, quality, and economic factors of spinach under different regimes were determined. The yield was the highest when spinach was grown under the condition of the soil water content at 16.5% combined with 170 kg ha−1 of nitrogen fertilizer, while the lowest yield was recorded for the one under the soil water content at 12.5% with 0 kg ha−1. Nitrate and oxalate contents of spinach were highly dependent on levels of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization. Nitrogen fertilization significantly decreased nitrogen use efficiency. Both water use efficiency and profit responded positively to increased nitrogen fertilizer usage. To optimize the quality and earnings of spinach, and consider the fact that nitrogen fertilizer could degrade the quality of spinach, application of the nitrogen fertilizer at 85 kg ha−1 and maintenance of the soil water content at 16.5% could be recommended for spinach cultivation under field conditions. Therefore, the findings in this present study are important to improve our knowledge of the irrigation and fertilization for the sustainable agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinach yield was highest at 16.5% soil water content with 170 kg ha−1 nitrogen fertilizer.

Treatment
soil water content at 16.5% combined with 170 kg ha−1 of nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield was the highest when spinach was grown under the condition of the soil water content at 16.5% combined with 170 kg ha−1 of nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinach yield was lowest at 12.5% soil water content with no nitrogen fertilizer.

Treatment
soil water content at 12.5% with 0 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest yield was recorded for the one under the soil water content at 12.5% with 0 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–691 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinach nitrate content depended strongly on irrigation and nitrogen fertilization levels.

Treatment
levels of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
Nitratee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate and oxalate contents of spinach were highly dependent on levels of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–806 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinach oxalate content depended strongly on irrigation and nitrogen fertilization levels.

Treatment
levels of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
oxalate contentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate and oxalate contents of spinach were highly dependent on levels of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–806 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization significantly decreased spinach nitrogen use efficiency.

Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilization significantly decreased nitrogen use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen fertilizer use improved spinach water use efficiency.

Treatment
increased nitrogen fertilizer usagee0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
positivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both water use efficiency and profit responded positively to increased nitrogen fertilizer usage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen fertilizer use improved profit from spinach production.

Treatment
increased nitrogen fertilizer usagee0
Outcome
profite0
Direction
positivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both water use efficiency and profit responded positively to increased nitrogen fertilizer usage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 85 kg ha−1 nitrogen fertilizer and 16.5% soil water content for field spinach to optimize quality and earnings.

Outcome
application of the nitrogen fertilizer at 85 kg ha−1 and maintenance of the soil water content at 16.5%e0
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of the nitrogen fertilizer at 85 kg ha−1 and maintenance of the soil water content at 16.5% could be recommended for spinach cultivation under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1282 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results differ

79 papers: 68 positive, 11 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.