Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Wool Pellets Are a Viable Alternative to Commercial Fertilizer for Organic Vegetable Production

Terence Bradshaw; Kimberley Hagen

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The maintenance of optimum mineral nutrient fertility is a limiting factor in organic vegetable systems, with many growers resorting to applications of off-farm commercial fertilizer inputs. In this study, pelleted sheep’s wool was compared against a standard commercial fertilizer product for effects on productivity and plant growth in spinach and tomato. Two rates of wool pellets were applied; one was standardized to the nitrogen inputs of the ‘grower standard’ commercial treatment, and a second higher rate which was suggested by the pellet manufacturer with about 2.5 times the nitrogen content. Overall, few differences were observed among the fertilized treatments. Crop yield for both tomato and spinach generally increased with increasing fertility application, with no differences between commercial and wool pellet fertilizers applied at the same rate of nitrogen. The uptake of mineral nutrients in spinach plant tissues differed for K, Mg, P, S, B, and Ca, but there was no general trend that could be attributed to a particular treatment. Tomato fruit quality was the same for all treatments, but non-fertilized fruit had lower total polyphenols than the highest-fertility treatment. Overall, wool pellets performed very similarly to commercial organic fertilizer for both crops and could be a promising alternative that may open up opportunities for greater integration of plant and animal systems on diversified farms.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield generally increased with increasing fertilizer application.

Treatment
increasing fertility applicatione0
Outcome
Crop yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop yield for both tomato and spinach generally increased with increasing fertility application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–772 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinach yield generally increased with increasing fertilizer application.

Treatment
increasing fertility applicatione0
Outcome
Crop yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop yield for both tomato and spinach generally increased with increasing fertility application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield did not differ between commercial and wool fertilizers at equal nitrogen rates.

Treatment
wool pellet fertilizerse0
Outcome
Crop yielde1
Direction
no differencese0
Qualifier
same rate of nitrogene0
Comparator
commerciale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no differences between commercial and wool pellet fertilizers applied at the same rate of nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–877 · show in text ↑
e1

“Crop yield for both tomato and spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinach yield did not differ between commercial and wool fertilizers at equal nitrogen rates.

Treatment
wool pellet fertilizerse0
Outcome
Crop yielde1
Direction
no differencese0
Qualifier
same rate of nitrogene0
Comparator
commerciale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no differences between commercial and wool pellet fertilizers applied at the same rate of nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–877 · show in text ↑
e1

“Crop yield for both tomato and spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–714 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinach tissue K, Mg and P uptake differed among treatments without a consistent treatment trend.

Organ / stage
plant tissuese0
Outcome
uptake of mineral nutrientse0
Qualifier
no general trend that could be attributed to a particular treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake of mineral nutrients in spinach plant tissues differed for K, Mg, P, S, B, and Ca, but there was no general trend that could be attributed to a particular treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit quality was the same across treatments.

Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
samee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato fruit quality was the same for all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unfertilized tomato fruit had lower total polyphenols than fruit under the highest fertility.

Treatment
non-fertilizede0
Outcome
total polyphenolse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
highest-fertility treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“non-fertilized fruit had lower total polyphenols than the highest-fertility treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1199 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1076 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wool pellets performed similarly to commercial organic fertilizer for tomato.

Outcome
performed very similarlye0
Comparator
commercial organic fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wool pellets performed very similarly to commercial organic fertilizer for both crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1295 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–356 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wool pellets performed similarly to commercial organic fertilizer for spinach.

Outcome
performed very similarlye0
Comparator
commercial organic fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wool pellets performed very similarly to commercial organic fertilizer for both crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1295 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–356 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose wool pellets as a promising alternative for diversified farms.

Outcome
promising alternativee0
Qualifier
diversified farmse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wool pellets performed very similarly to commercial organic fertilizer for both crops and could be a promising alternative that may open up opportunities for greater integration of plant and animal systems on diversified farms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1436 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–356 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results differ

79 papers: 68 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 68 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

127 papers in the same direction as this paper · 850 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.