Paper · 1998 · Agronomie

Differential nickel tolerance of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes in nutrient culture

Sanghamitra Samantaray; Gyana Ranjan Rout; Premananda Das

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Eight cultivars of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) were tested for their tolerance to different levels of nickel (Ni) (0, 6, 12, 18 and 24 μM) in nutrient solution at pH 6.8. Seeds were germinated and grown in the presence of nick- el under controlled environmental conditions. Standard growth parameters such as root length, shoot length, root/shoot dry biomass production and root/shoot tolerance index were used as markers of nickel toxicity. Measurements as early as 24 h after the beginning of treatment did not yield consistent results. However, root measurements 3, 6 and 9 days after the beginning of treatments yielded significant differences among cultivars which were similar to field performance in nickel-rich soils. The cultivars Dhauli and PDM-116 showed root growth while LGG-407, K-851, TARM-22 and TARM-1, TARM-21, TARM-26 exhibited a reverse trend in root growth in the presence of nickel (12 μM). The root tol- erance index (RTI) and the shoot tolerance index (STI) with respect to Dhauli and PDM-116 were high indicating their tolerance to nickel; TARM-21 and TARM-26, however, showed a low RTI and STI. Based on the growth parameters eight cultivars of mung bean were ranked with respect to their tolerance to nickel: Dhauli > PDM-116 > LGG-407 > K-851 > TARM-22 > TARM-1 > TARM-21> TARM-26. Nickel induced greater G6PDH and GDH activity in Dhauli and PDM-116 as compared to LGG-407, K-851, TARM-22, TARM-1, TARM-21 and TARM-26. This method can be employed for quick screening of mung bean for nickel tolerance. ( © Inra/Elsevier, Paris.) nickel toxicity / glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase / glutamate dehydrogenase / mung bean / screening Rsum -Tolrance au nickel de divers gnotypes de haricot mungo (Vigna radiata L.) cultivs sur solution nutri- tive. On a test la tolrance de huit cultivars de haricot mungo divers niveaux de nickel (Ni) (0, 6, 12, 18 et 24 μM) prsents dans une solution nutritive pH 6,8. Les graines ont germ et se sont dveloppes en prsence de nickel en conditions de milieu contrles. Les paramtres standard de la croissance, tels que la longueur des racines, la longueur des pousses, la production de biomasse des racines et celle des pousses, l'indice de tolrance des racines et celui des pousses, ont t utiliss comme marqueurs de la toxicit du Ni. Les mesures faites 24 h aprs le dbut du traitement n'ont Communicated by Marco Trevisan (Piacenza, Italy)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Measurements at 24 h did not yield consistent results.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
consistent resultse0
Value
24 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Measurements as early as 24 h after the beginning of treatment did not yield consistent results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–538 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–42 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root measurements at 3, 6 and 9 days significantly differentiated cultivars in a way similar to field nickel performance.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
differences among cultivarse0
Value
3, 6 and 9 dayse0
Comparator
field performance in nickel-rich soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root measurements 3, 6 and 9 days after the beginning of treatments yielded significant differences among cultivars which were similar to field performance in nickel-rich soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dhauli and PDM-116 showed root growth at 12 μM nickel.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Material
Dhauli and PDM-116e0
Treatment
nickel (12 μM)e0
Outcome
root growthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivars Dhauli and PDM-116 showed root growth while LGG-407, K-851, TARM-22 and TARM-1, TARM-21, TARM-26 exhibited a reverse trend in root growth in the presence of nickel (12 μM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The other six named cultivars showed the reverse root growth trend under 12 μM nickel.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Material
LGG-407, K-851, TARM-22 and TARM-1, TARM-21, TARM-26e0
Treatment
nickel (12 μM)e0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
reverse trende0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LGG-407, K-851, TARM-22 and TARM-1, TARM-21, TARM-26 exhibited a reverse trend in root growth in the presence of nickel (12 μM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dhauli and PDM-116 had high root and shoot tolerance indexes.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Material
Dhauli and PDM-116e0
Outcome
root tol- erance index (RTI) and the shoot tolerance index (STI)e0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root tol- erance index (RTI) and the shoot tolerance index (STI) with respect to Dhauli and PDM-116 were high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TARM-21 and TARM-26 had low root and shoot tolerance indexes.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Material
TARM-21 and TARM-26e0
Outcome
RTI and STIe0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TARM-21 and TARM-26, however, showed a low RTI and STI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivars were ranked for nickel tolerance from Dhauli highest to TARM-26 lowest.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
Dhauli > PDM-116 > LGG-407 > K-851 > TARM-22 > TARM-1 > TARM-21> TARM-26e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dhauli > PDM-116 > LGG-407 > K-851 > TARM-22 > TARM-1 > TARM-21> TARM-26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel induced greater G6PDH and GDH activity in Dhauli and PDM-116 than in the other six cultivars.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Material
Dhauli and PDM-116e0
Treatment
Nickele0
Outcome
G6PDH and GDH activitye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
LGG-407, K-851, TARM-22, TARM-1, TARM-21 and TARM-26e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nickel induced greater G6PDH and GDH activity in Dhauli and PDM-116 as compared to LGG-407, K-851, TARM-22, TARM-1, TARM-21 and TARM-26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–42 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose root measurements for quick screening of nickel tolerance.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Outcome
quick screening of mung bean for nickel tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This method can be employed for quick screening of mung bean for nickel tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1529 · show in text ↑

nickel atom · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.