Paper · 2008 · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology

Physiological and Growth Responses of C3and C4Plants to Reduced Temperature When Grown at Low CO2of the Last Ice Age

Joy K. Ward; David A. Myers; Richard B. Thomas

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
28
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

During the last ice age, CO2 concentration ([CO2]) was 180-200 micromol/mol compared with the modern value of 380 micromol/mol, and global temperatures were approximately 8 degrees C cooler. Relatively little is known about the responses of C3 and C4 species to long-term exposure to glacial conditions. Here Abutilon theophrasti Medik. (C3) and Amaranthus retroflexus L. (C4) were grown at 200 micromol/mol CO2 with current (30/24 degrees C) and glacial (22/16 degrees C) temperatures for 22 d. Overall, the C4 species exhibited a large growth advantage over the C3 species at low [CO2]. However, this advantage was reduced at low temperature, where the C4 species produced 5 x the total mass of the C3 species versus 14 x at the high temperature. This difference was due to a reduction in C4 growth at low temperature, since the C3 species exhibited similar growth between temperatures. Physiological differences between temperatures were not detected for either species, although photorespiration/net photosynthesis was reduced in the C3 species grown at low temperature, suggesting evidence of improved carbon balance at this treatment. This system suggests that C4 species had a growth advantage over C3 species during low [CO2] of the last ice age, although concurrent reductions in temperatures may have reduced this advantage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low CO2 the C4 species Amaranthus retroflexus showed a large growth advantage over the C3 species.

Taxon
Amaranthus retroflexus L. (C4)Amaranthus retroflexuse0
Treatment
200 micromol/mol CO2e0
Outcome
growth advantagee1
Direction
advantagee1
Comparator
C3 speciese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · TaxonLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Here Abutilon theophrasti Medik. (C3) and Amaranthus retroflexus L. (C4) were grown at 200 micromol/mol CO2 with current (30/24 degrees C) and glacial (22/16 degrees C) temperatures for 22 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–494 · show in text ↑
e1

“Overall, the C4 species exhibited a large growth advantage over the C3 species at low [CO2]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low temperature the C4 species produced 5 times the total mass of the C3 species.

Taxon
C4 speciese2
Treatment
low temperaturee2
Outcome
total masse2
Direction
producede2
Value
5 xe2
Comparator
the C3 speciese2

Verbatim

e2

“this advantage was reduced at low temperature, where the C4 species produced 5 x the total mass of the C3 species versus 14 x at the high temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high temperature the C4 species produced 14 times the total mass of the C3 species.

Taxon
C4 speciese2
Treatment
high temperaturee2
Outcome
total masse2
Direction
producede2
Value
14 xe2
Comparator
the C3 speciese2

Verbatim

e2

“this advantage was reduced at low temperature, where the C4 species produced 5 x the total mass of the C3 species versus 14 x at the high temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth advantage of the C4 species over the C3 species was reduced at low temperature compared with high temperature.

Taxon
C4 speciese2
Treatment
low temperaturee2
Outcome
advantagee2
Direction
reducede2
Comparator
high temperaturee2

Verbatim

e2

“this advantage was reduced at low temperature, where the C4 species produced 5 x the total mass of the C3 species versus 14 x at the high temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The C3 species Abutilon theophrasti showed similar growth at glacial and current temperatures.

Taxon
Abutilon theophrasti Medik. (C3)Abutilon theophrastie0
Treatment
glacial (22/16 degrees C) temperaturese0
Outcome
growthe3
Direction
similare3
Comparator
current (30/24 degrees C)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · TaxonI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Here Abutilon theophrasti Medik. (C3) and Amaranthus retroflexus L. (C4) were grown at 200 micromol/mol CO2 with current (30/24 degrees C) and glacial (22/16 degrees C) temperatures for 22 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–494 · show in text ↑
e3

“the C3 species exhibited similar growth between temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction in the C4 growth advantage at low temperature was due to a reduction in C4 growth.

Taxon
Amaranthus retroflexus L. (C4)Amaranthus retroflexuse0
Treatment
low temperaturee6
Outcome
C4 growthe6
Direction
reductione6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · TaxonLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Here Abutilon theophrasti Medik. (C3) and Amaranthus retroflexus L. (C4) were grown at 200 micromol/mol CO2 with current (30/24 degrees C) and glacial (22/16 degrees C) temperatures for 22 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–494 · show in text ↑
e6

“due to a reduction in C4 growth at low temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–819 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Physiological differences between glacial and current temperatures were not detected for either species.

Taxon
Abutilon theophrasti Medik. (C3) and Amaranthus retroflexus L. (C4)Abutilon theophrastiAmaranthus retroflexuse0
Treatment
glacial (22/16 degrees C) temperaturese0
Outcome
Physiological differencese4
Direction
not detectede4
Comparator
current (30/24 degrees C)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · TaxonI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · TaxonLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Here Abutilon theophrasti Medik. (C3) and Amaranthus retroflexus L. (C4) were grown at 200 micromol/mol CO2 with current (30/24 degrees C) and glacial (22/16 degrees C) temperatures for 22 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–494 · show in text ↑
e4

“Physiological differences between temperatures were not detected for either species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photorespiration/net photosynthesis was reduced in the C3 species Abutilon theophrasti at low temperature, suggesting improved carbon balance.

Taxon
Abutilon theophrasti Medik. (C3)Abutilon theophrastie0
Treatment
low temperaturee5
Outcome
photorespiration/net photosynthesise5
Direction
reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · TaxonI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Here Abutilon theophrasti Medik. (C3) and Amaranthus retroflexus L. (C4) were grown at 200 micromol/mol CO2 with current (30/24 degrees C) and glacial (22/16 degrees C) temperatures for 22 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–494 · show in text ↑
e5

“photorespiration/net photosynthesis was reduced in the C3 species grown at low temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1073 · show in text ↑

cold · physiology: photosynthesis · Abutilon theophrasti (velvetleaf)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

co2 · growth · Amaranthus retroflexus (redroot amaranth)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.