Paper · 2007 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Interaction between nitrogen and sulfur by foliar application and its effects on flour bread‐making quality

Illa Tea; Thierry Genter; Norbert Naulet; et al.

8
claims
23
verbatim quotes
75
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND: Optimization of nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) nutrition of wheat influences the bread‐making quality of grain. This study was conducted to determine whether the application of N and S in winter wheat at anthesis stage during two field trials could influence the absorption and distribution of N and S in grain and flour bread‐making quality RESULTS: The incorporation of 15 N and 34 S tracers in various plant parts (leaves, stems, spikes) was determined by isotopic ratio mass spectrometry coupled with an elemental analyser (EA‐IRMS). The effects of foliar fertilization on percentage of 15 N and 34 S recovery in various plant parts, grain yield, flour protein content, and dough properties were investigated after a combination of treatments: N (urea), S (micronized elemental S) and NS (both urea and micronized elemental S). Nitrogen (70–80%) and S (35–55%) were quickly assimilated during the days following application. Sixty days after application, 42–68% N and 6–12% S were recovered in the grain. When N and S fertilizers were applied simultaneously, N and S recoveries (68% and 12%), N/S ratios (11–14), flour protein content (115 g kg −1 ) and dough strength (310 × 10 −4 J), swelling (21.8 mmH 2 O) and extensibility (96.4 mm) were increased. CONCLUSION: A synergistic effect between the foliar applied N and S fertilizers appears to increase N and S assimilation in grain and may improve bread‐making qualities. Copyright © 2007 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneous foliar N and S application increased N recovery in grain (68%).

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
N and S fertilizerse1
Outcome
N and S recoveriese1
Direction
increasede1
Value
68%e1
Comparator
N (urea), S (micronized elemental S)e3
Setting
two field trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of N and S in winter wheat at anthesis stage during two field trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–260 · show in text ↑
e1

“When N and S fertilizers were applied simultaneously, N and S recoveries (68% and 12%), N/S ratios (11–14), flour protein content (115 g kg −1 ) and dough strength (310 × 10 −4 J), swelling (21.8 mmH 2 O) and extensibility (96.4 mm) were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1274 · show in text ↑
e3

“N (urea), S (micronized elemental S) and NS (both urea and micronized elemental S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneous foliar N and S application increased S recovery in grain (12%).

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
N and S fertilizerse1
Outcome
N and S recoveriese1
Direction
increasede1
Value
12%e1
Comparator
N (urea), S (micronized elemental S)e3
Setting
two field trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of N and S in winter wheat at anthesis stage during two field trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–260 · show in text ↑
e1

“When N and S fertilizers were applied simultaneously, N and S recoveries (68% and 12%), N/S ratios (11–14), flour protein content (115 g kg −1 ) and dough strength (310 × 10 −4 J), swelling (21.8 mmH 2 O) and extensibility (96.4 mm) were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1274 · show in text ↑
e3

“N (urea), S (micronized elemental S) and NS (both urea and micronized elemental S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneous foliar N and S application increased the N/S ratio (11–14).

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
N and S fertilizerse1
Outcome
N/S ratiose1
Direction
increasede1
Value
11–14e1
Comparator
N (urea), S (micronized elemental S)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of N and S in winter wheat at anthesis stage during two field trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–260 · show in text ↑
e1

“When N and S fertilizers were applied simultaneously, N and S recoveries (68% and 12%), N/S ratios (11–14), flour protein content (115 g kg −1 ) and dough strength (310 × 10 −4 J), swelling (21.8 mmH 2 O) and extensibility (96.4 mm) were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1274 · show in text ↑
e3

“N (urea), S (micronized elemental S) and NS (both urea and micronized elemental S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneous foliar N and S application increased flour protein content (115 g kg −1).

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
N and S fertilizerse1
Outcome
flour protein contente1
Direction
increasede1
Value
115 g kg −1e1
Comparator
N (urea), S (micronized elemental S)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of N and S in winter wheat at anthesis stage during two field trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–260 · show in text ↑
e1

“When N and S fertilizers were applied simultaneously, N and S recoveries (68% and 12%), N/S ratios (11–14), flour protein content (115 g kg −1 ) and dough strength (310 × 10 −4 J), swelling (21.8 mmH 2 O) and extensibility (96.4 mm) were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1274 · show in text ↑
e3

“N (urea), S (micronized elemental S) and NS (both urea and micronized elemental S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneous foliar N and S application increased dough strength (310 × 10 −4 J).

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
N and S fertilizerse1
Outcome
dough strengthe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
310 × 10 −4 Je1
Comparator
N (urea), S (micronized elemental S)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of N and S in winter wheat at anthesis stage during two field trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–260 · show in text ↑
e1

“When N and S fertilizers were applied simultaneously, N and S recoveries (68% and 12%), N/S ratios (11–14), flour protein content (115 g kg −1 ) and dough strength (310 × 10 −4 J), swelling (21.8 mmH 2 O) and extensibility (96.4 mm) were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1274 · show in text ↑
e3

“N (urea), S (micronized elemental S) and NS (both urea and micronized elemental S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneous foliar N and S application increased dough swelling (21.8 mmH2O).

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
N and S fertilizerse1
Outcome
swellinge1
Direction
increasede1
Value
21.8 mmH 2 Oe1
Comparator
N (urea), S (micronized elemental S)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of N and S in winter wheat at anthesis stage during two field trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–260 · show in text ↑
e1

“When N and S fertilizers were applied simultaneously, N and S recoveries (68% and 12%), N/S ratios (11–14), flour protein content (115 g kg −1 ) and dough strength (310 × 10 −4 J), swelling (21.8 mmH 2 O) and extensibility (96.4 mm) were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1274 · show in text ↑
e3

“N (urea), S (micronized elemental S) and NS (both urea and micronized elemental S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneous foliar N and S application increased dough extensibility (96.4 mm).

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
N and S fertilizerse1
Outcome
extensibilitye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
96.4 mme1
Comparator
N (urea), S (micronized elemental S)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of N and S in winter wheat at anthesis stage during two field trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–260 · show in text ↑
e1

“When N and S fertilizers were applied simultaneously, N and S recoveries (68% and 12%), N/S ratios (11–14), flour protein content (115 g kg −1 ) and dough strength (310 × 10 −4 J), swelling (21.8 mmH 2 O) and extensibility (96.4 mm) were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1274 · show in text ↑
e3

“N (urea), S (micronized elemental S) and NS (both urea and micronized elemental S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–848 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A synergistic effect between foliar N and S fertilizers appears to increase N and S assimilation in grain.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
foliar applied N and S fertilizerse4
Outcome
N and S assimilation in graine4
Qualifier
synergistic effecte4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of N and S in winter wheat at anthesis stage during two field trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–260 · show in text ↑
e4

“A synergistic effect between the foliar applied N and S fertilizers appears to increase N and S assimilation in grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1405 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.