Paper · 2007 · Plant Production Science

Evaluation of Transplanting Date and Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate Adapted by Farmers to Toposequential Variation ofEnvironmental Resources in a Mini-Watershed (Nong) in Northeast Thailand

Koki Homma; Takeshi Horie; Tatsuhiko Shiraiwa; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Environmental resources for rainfed rice production show large variability even within a small area in Northeast Thailand, and it is said that farmer’s management is well adapted to the variability. This study evaluated transplanting date and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rate in the management to improve rice productivity. The effect of transplanting date and N fertilizer rate on rice productivity was analyzed by investigating rice growth, and also by dividing rainfed rice fields located in a mini-watershed into 4 subecosystems: (1) medium deep water, waterlogged (MDW), (2) shallow water, favorable (SWf), (3) shallow water, drought- and submergence-prone (SWds), and (4) shallow water, drought-prone (SWd). Rice grew at almost a constant rate until maturity and the growth rate was higher at a lower field. The difference in productivity was derived from not only a water condition but also soil fertility, and was associated with the rate of N uptake. Small leaf area index was found to be one of the causes for low productivity in rice. Statistic analysis showed that earlier transplanting increased biomass production in all subecosystems. The biomass-increase resulted in a higher yield in SWds and SWd fields while it resulted in a reduced harvest index (HI) and did not increase yield in MDW and SWf fields. The effect of N fertilizer was apparent in the field where rice biomass was small due to later transplanting or unfertile soil, but the effect was generally small. Earlier transplanting in upper fields and later transplanting in lower fields in mini-watersheds were suggested to improve rice production, and proper distribution of N fertilizer use is considered necessary.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier transplanting increased rice biomass production in all subecosystems

Treatment
earlier transplantinge2
Outcome
biomass productione2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“This study evaluated transplanting date and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rate in the management to improve rice productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“Statistic analysis showed that earlier transplanting increased biomass production in all subecosystems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1144 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass increase gave a higher rice yield in SWds and SWd fields

Outcome
yielde3
Direction
highere3
Setting
SWds and SWd fieldse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“This study evaluated transplanting date and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rate in the management to improve rice productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–318 · show in text ↑
e3

“The biomass-increase resulted in a higher yield in SWds and SWd fields while it resulted in a reduced harvest index (HI) and did not increase yield in MDW and SWf fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1315 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index was reduced in MDW and SWf fields with biomass increase

Outcome
harvest index (HI)e3
Direction
reducede3
Setting
MDW and SWf fieldse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“This study evaluated transplanting date and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rate in the management to improve rice productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–318 · show in text ↑
e3

“The biomass-increase resulted in a higher yield in SWds and SWd fields while it resulted in a reduced harvest index (HI) and did not increase yield in MDW and SWf fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1315 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass increase did not increase rice yield in MDW and SWf fields

Outcome
yielde3
Direction
did not increasee3
Setting
MDW and SWf fieldse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“This study evaluated transplanting date and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rate in the management to improve rice productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–318 · show in text ↑
e3

“The biomass-increase resulted in a higher yield in SWds and SWd fields while it resulted in a reduced harvest index (HI) and did not increase yield in MDW and SWf fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effect of N fertilizer on rice was apparent only where biomass was small, and was generally small

Treatment
N fertilizere4
Outcome
effect of N fertilizere4
Direction
smalle4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“This study evaluated transplanting date and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rate in the management to improve rice productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–318 · show in text ↑
e4

“The effect of N fertilizer was apparent in the field where rice biomass was small due to later transplanting or unfertile soil, but the effect was generally small”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1479 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small leaf area index was one of the causes of low rice productivity

Outcome
low productivitye5
Qualifier
Small leaf area indexe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“This study evaluated transplanting date and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rate in the management to improve rice productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–318 · show in text ↑
e5

“Small leaf area index was found to be one of the causes for low productivity in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1040 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Productivity difference in rice was derived from water condition and soil fertility

Outcome
difference in productivitye6
Qualifier
not only a water condition but also soil fertilitye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“This study evaluated transplanting date and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rate in the management to improve rice productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–318 · show in text ↑
e6

“The difference in productivity was derived from not only a water condition but also soil fertility, and was associated with the rate of N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–954 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice grew at an almost constant rate until maturity

Outcome
growth ratee7
Qualifier
almost a constant rate until maturitye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“This study evaluated transplanting date and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rate in the management to improve rice productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–318 · show in text ↑
e7

“Rice grew at almost a constant rate until maturity and the growth rate was higher at a lower field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–808 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice growth rate was higher at a lower field

Outcome
growth ratee7
Direction
highere7
Setting
lower fielde7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“This study evaluated transplanting date and nitrogen (N) fertilizer rate in the management to improve rice productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–318 · show in text ↑
e7

“Rice grew at almost a constant rate until maturity and the growth rate was higher at a lower field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–808 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier transplanting in upper fields and later transplanting in lower fields is suggested to improve rice production

Treatment
Earlier transplanting in upper fieldse3
Outcome
rice productione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Earlier transplanting in upper fields and later transplanting in lower fields in mini-watersheds were suggested to improve rice production, and proper distribution of N fertilizer use is considered necessary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1688 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Proper distribution of N fertilizer use is considered necessary for rice

Outcome
proper distribution of N fertilizer usee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Earlier transplanting in upper fields and later transplanting in lower fields in mini-watersheds were suggested to improve rice production, and proper distribution of N fertilizer use is considered necessary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1688 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.