Paper · 2010 · International Journal of Vegetable Science

Yield, Nutrients, and Antioxidants of Tomato in Response to Grafting and Substrate

Damianos Neocleous

1
claims
3
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Grafting is becoming popular for expanding soilless cultivation of tomato in substrates and one of the main interests for growing grafted tomatoes is to improve fruit quality. The objective of our research was to examine the effect of grafting and substrate on yield and fruit quality. Seedlings of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), cv. FA 179 Brillante, were used as scion and nongrafted control, and tomato (L. lycopersicon L. Kirsten ex Farwell), cv. Resistar, was used as rootstock. The effect of grafting on tomato yield, leaf nutrient status, and fruit quality (some quality attributes and antioxidant compounds) was assessed by growing plants under greenhouse conditions in a soilless system using two different substrates (local gravel and perlite). No changes in yield, leaf nutrient status, or fruit quality were observed in response to grafting and substrate and the interaction was not significant. The lack of any differences in the measured parameters may be attributed to no limitations in plant development due to the growing system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting and substrate caused no changes in tomato yield, leaf nutrient status or fruit quality, and their interaction was not significant.

Material
FA 179 Brillantee0
Treatment
grafting and substratee1
Outcome
yield, leaf nutrient status, or fruit qualitye1
Direction
No changese1
Comparator
nongrafted controle0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), cv. FA 179 Brillante, were used as scion and nongrafted control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–402 · show in text ↑
e1

“No changes in yield, leaf nutrient status, or fruit quality were observed in response to grafting and substrate and the interaction was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–915 · show in text ↑
e2

“growing plants under greenhouse conditions in a soilless system using two different substrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–735 · show in text ↑

growing medium · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

grafting · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 8 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.