Paper · 1974 · Agronomy Journal

Phosphate Placement for Corn in Chisel and Moldboard Plowing Systems1

L. J. Cihacek; D. L. Mulvaney; R. A. Olson; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Field experiments conducted at three locations in Nebraska and one in Illinois compared tillage by chisel and moldboard plowing for corn ( Zea mays L.). Specific objectives were to compare the two tillage systems in respect to growth characteristics and final yield of corn, to ascertain the most effective method of applying fertilizer P with chisel plowing, and to determine residual P distribution in the rooting zone after 3 years with the various systems employed. Fertilizer P was applied at three or four rates as orthophosphoric acid in conjunction with varied tillage and placement as follows: 1) surface broadcasting of P and incorporation by chisel plow tillage, 2) P application by chisel plow at 18 to 20‐cm depth, 3) chisel plow tillage with P banded beside the row at planting, and 4) moldboard plow tillage following surface broadcasting of P. Primary tillage was accomplished in the fall after corn harvest. Somewhat higher yields were obtained with moldboard plowing than with chisel plowing, irrespective of P rate or placement. This benefit for the moldboard plow is offset by the moisture conservation and erosion control advantages afforded by the chisel. Broadcast P prior to chiselling and deep placement of P with the chisel gave comparable yields, although deep placement afforded greater season‐long crop feeding on the fertilizer. Runoff loss of P on sediment was minimized with chisel placement of the P.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moldboard plowing gave somewhat higher corn yields than chisel plowing, irrespective of P rate or placement.

Treatment
moldboard plowinge1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
irrespective of P rate or placemente1
Comparator
chisel plowinge1
Setting
three locations in Nebraska and one in Illinoise2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Somewhat higher yields were obtained with moldboard plowing than with chisel plowing, irrespective of P rate or placement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1055 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments conducted at three locations in Nebraska and one in Illinois compared tillage by chisel and moldboard plowing for corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The moisture conservation and erosion control advantages of chisel plowing offset the yield benefit of moldboard plowing.

Treatment
chisele3
Outcome
moisture conservation and erosion controle3
Comparator
moldboard plowe3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Field experiments conducted at three locations in Nebraska and one in Illinois compared tillage by chisel and moldboard plowing for corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–160 · show in text ↑
e3

“This benefit for the moldboard plow is offset by the moisture conservation and erosion control advantages afforded by the chisel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast P before chiselling and deep P placement with the chisel gave comparable corn yields.

Treatment
Broadcast P prior to chisellinge4
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Comparator
deep placement of P with the chisele4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Field experiments conducted at three locations in Nebraska and one in Illinois compared tillage by chisel and moldboard plowing for corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–160 · show in text ↑
e4

“Broadcast P prior to chiselling and deep placement of P with the chisel gave comparable yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1281 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep placement of P gave greater crop feeding on the fertilizer than broadcast P prior to chiselling.

Treatment
deep placemente5
Outcome
crop feeding on the fertilizere5
Direction
greatere5
Comparator
Broadcast P prior to chisellinge4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Field experiments conducted at three locations in Nebraska and one in Illinois compared tillage by chisel and moldboard plowing for corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–160 · show in text ↑
e4

“Broadcast P prior to chiselling and deep placement of P with the chisel gave comparable yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1281 · show in text ↑
e5

“although deep placement afforded greater season‐long crop feeding on the fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1366 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chisel placement of P minimized runoff loss of P on sediment from corn fields.

Treatment
chisel placement of the Pe6
Outcome
Runoff loss of P on sedimente6
Direction
minimizede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Field experiments conducted at three locations in Nebraska and one in Illinois compared tillage by chisel and moldboard plowing for corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–160 · show in text ↑
e6

“Runoff loss of P on sediment was minimized with chisel placement of the P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1441 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

130 papers: 88 positive, 42 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 88 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

126 papers more in this group

See all 130 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.