Paper · 1999 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Cultivar variation in response of strawberry fruit to high carbon dioxide treatments

Christopher B Watkins; Juan E Manzano-Mendez; Jacqueline F Nock; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
75
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The influence of cultivar on responses of strawberry fruit to 20 kPa CO2 or air storage at 2 °C was measured for 7 days. CO2 storage increased firmness of all cultivars over air storage, but the degree of increase was affected by cultivar and days in storage. CO2-treated fruit were lighter colored and less intensely red than air-treated fruit. Accumulations of acetaldehyde, ethanol and ethyl acetate in CO2-treated fruit were strongly affected by cultivar, with those in ‘Annapolis’ having the lowest and those in ‘Governor Simcoe’ having the highest concentrations. Genetic variation in this response provides useful material for investigating the metabolic basis of CO2 effects in strawberry fruit. © 1999 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon dioxide storage increased firmness of all strawberry cultivars over air storage.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
CO2 storagee0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
air storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO2 storage increased firmness of all cultivars over air storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–185 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–50 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The firmness increase varied with cultivar and storage duration.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
cultivare0
Outcome
firmnesse1
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the degree of increase was affected by cultivar and days in storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–259 · show in text ↑
e1

“firmness of all cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–168 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon dioxide treated fruit were lighter colored than air treated fruit.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
CO2-treatede0
Outcome
lighter colorede0
Direction
lightere0
Comparator
air-treatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO2-treated fruit were lighter colored and less intensely red than air-treated fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–345 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon dioxide treated fruit were less intensely red than air treated fruit.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
CO2-treatede0
Outcome
intensely rede0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
air-treatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO2-treated fruit were lighter colored and less intensely red than air-treated fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–345 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Volatile accumulation in carbon dioxide treated fruit differed strongly by cultivar, lowest in Annapolis and highest in Governor Simcoe.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
Annapolise0
Outcome
Accumulations of acetaldehyde, ethanol and ethyl acetatee0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
Governor Simcoee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Accumulations of acetaldehyde, ethanol and ethyl acetate in CO2-treated fruit were strongly affected by cultivar, with those in ‘Annapolis’ having the lowest and those in ‘Governor Simcoe’ having the highest concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–50 · show in text ↑

co2 · quality: postharvest · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 35 positive, 4 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 117 positive, 4 negative or no effect

116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.