Paper · 2000 · Agronomy Journal

Row Spacing, Plant Population, and Cultivar Effects on Grain Amaranth in the Northern Great Plains

Tracey L. Henderson; Burton L. Johnson; Albert A. Schneiter

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
65
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An understanding of plant response to row spacing and plant density is important in developing effective production systems for new crops. Optimum row spacing and plant population for grain amaranth ( Amaranthus spp.) production in the northern Great Plains was evaluated at Prosper and Williston, ND, over 6 station‐years. Amaranth cultivars K283, K343, K432, and MT‐3 were established at populations of 74 000, 173 000, and 272 000 plants ha −1 in 30‐ and 76‐cm row spacings. Grain and biomass yield, plant height, harvest index, harvested plant population, and plant lodging were measured. Grain yields were similar among plant populations at each of the drier environments, averaging 1050 and 410 kg ha −1 for Prosper in 1989 and Williston in 1990, respectively. A 12% yield advantage, 160 kg ha −1 , was observed at the lowest compared with the highest plant population at Prosper in 1990, but not in 1992. The main effect of row spacing on grain yield was not significant; however, the interaction of row spacing, plant population, and environment indicated population yield ranking differences at the 30‐cm row spacing among environments but not at the 76‐cm row spacing. The two A. cruentus L. cultivars, K283 and MT‐3, generally produced more grain than the two A. hypochondriacus L. × A. hybridus L. cultivars, K343 and K432, especially in dry environments. When considering yield, plant mortality, and potential harvest difficulties, the moderate population (173000 plants ha −1 ), 76‐cm row spacing, and generally higher‐yielding A. cruentus cultivars would be recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At dry sites, grain yield was similar across plant populations.

Taxon
grain amaranthAmaranthus hypochondriacust0
Treatment
plant populationse0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
at each of the drier environmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus hypochondriacus
Amaranthus hypochondriacus · Taxonhu:User:Szaga · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields were similar among plant populations at each of the drier environments, averaging 1050 and 410 kg ha −1 for Prosper in 1989 and Williston in 1990, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain amaranth”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Prosper in 1989 mean yield was 1050 kg ha −1.

Taxon
grain amaranthAmaranthus hypochondriacust0
Outcome
Graint0
Value
1050e0
Setting
Prosper in 1989e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus hypochondriacus
Amaranthus hypochondriacus · Taxonhu:User:Szaga · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“averaging 1050 and 410 kg ha −1 for Prosper in 1989 and Williston in 1990, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Amaranth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Williston in 1990 mean yield was 410 kg ha −1.

Taxon
grain amaranthAmaranthus hypochondriacust0
Outcome
Graint0
Value
410 kg ha −1e0
Setting
Williston in 1990e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus hypochondriacus
Amaranthus hypochondriacus · Taxonhu:User:Szaga · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“averaging 1050 and 410 kg ha −1 for Prosper in 1989 and Williston in 1990, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Amaranth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lowest population had a 12% grain-yield advantage of 160 kg ha −1 over highest population at Prosper in 1990, absent in 1992.

Taxon
grain amaranthAmaranthus hypochondriacust0
Treatment
the loweste0
Outcome
yield advantagee0
Direction
advantagee0
Value
12%e0
Qualifier
160 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
the highest plant populatione0
Setting
Prosper in 1990e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus hypochondriacus
Amaranthus hypochondriacus · Taxonhu:User:Szaga · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 12% yield advantage, 160 kg ha −1 , was observed at the lowest compared with the highest plant population at Prosper in 1990, but not in 1992”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain amaranth”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The main row-spacing effect on grain yield was not significant.

Taxon
grain amaranthAmaranthus hypochondriacust0
Treatment
row spacinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
not significante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus hypochondriacus
Amaranthus hypochondriacus · Taxonhu:User:Szaga · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main effect of row spacing on grain yield was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain amaranth”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Population yield rankings varied among environments at 30-cm spacing but not 76-cm spacing.

Taxon
grain amaranthAmaranthus hypochondriacust0
Treatment
30‐cm row spacinge0
Outcome
population yield ranking differencese0
Comparator
76‐cm row spacinge0
Setting
environmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus hypochondriacus
Amaranthus hypochondriacus · Taxonhu:User:Szaga · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“population yield ranking differences at the 30‐cm row spacing among environments but not at the 76‐cm row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain amaranth”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K283 and MT-3 generally produced more grain than K343 and K432, especially in dry environments.

Taxon
grain amaranthAmaranthus hypochondriacust0
Material
K283 and MT‐3e0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
especially in dry environmentse0
Comparator
K343 and K432e0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus hypochondriacus
Amaranthus hypochondriacus · Taxonhu:User:Szaga · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two A. cruentus L. cultivars, K283 and MT‐3, generally produced more grain than the two A. hypochondriacus L. × A. hybridus L. cultivars, K343 and K432, especially in dry environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1366 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain amaranth”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–69 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend a moderate population, 76-cm spacing and A. cruentus cultivars.

Taxon
grain amaranthAmaranthus hypochondriacust0
Outcome
the moderate population (173000 plants ha −1 ), 76‐cm row spacing, and generally higher‐yielding A. cruentus cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus hypochondriacus
Amaranthus hypochondriacus · Taxonhu:User:Szaga · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the moderate population (173000 plants ha −1 ), 76‐cm row spacing, and generally higher‐yielding A. cruentus cultivars would be recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1584 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain amaranth”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–69 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Amaranthus hypochondriacus (grain amaranth)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.