Paper · 1986 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effects of transpiration rate on boron uptake by roots and translocation to shoots of table beets (Beta vulgarisL.)1

Mary C. Halbrooks; Lloyd A. Peterson; Theodore T. Kozlowski

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effects of transpiration rate on B uptake by roots and translocation to shoots of table beet (Beta vulgaris L. cv. Red Ace) plants were studied under conditions of environmental control. Plants grown under high or low relative humidities (RH) had low or high rates of transpiration, respectively. Dry weights and B contents of shoots and roots were higher among plants grown at 80% RH and B concentrations of roots were lower compared to plants grown at 30% RH. Shoot B concentrations were not affected by RH. Rates of growth and B accumulation in shoots were closely correlated for plants grown in 30% or 80% RH. These parameters were not closely correlated in roots. The rate of B uptake per g root dry weight was greater in plants having higher transpiration rates; whereas the rate of B translocation to shoots per g dry weight was independent of transpiration rate. Thus we propose that B translocation to shoots is controlled mechanistically by rates of dry matter accumulation during stages of rapid growth, i.e. a sink effect.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry weights of shoots and roots were higher in plants grown at 80% RH than at 30% RH.

Material
Red Acee0
Organ / stage
shoots and rootse2
Treatment
plants grown at 80% RHe2
Outcome
Dry weightse2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
plants grown at 30% RHe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“table beet (Beta vulgaris L. cv. Red Ace) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–143 · show in text ↑
e2

“Dry weights and B contents of shoots and roots were higher among plants grown at 80% RH and B concentrations of roots were lower compared to plants grown at 30% RH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–473 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B contents of shoots and roots were higher in plants grown at 80% RH than at 30% RH.

Material
Red Acee0
Organ / stage
shoots and rootse2
Treatment
plants grown at 80% RHe2
Outcome
B contentse2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
plants grown at 30% RHe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“table beet (Beta vulgaris L. cv. Red Ace) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–143 · show in text ↑
e2

“Dry weights and B contents of shoots and roots were higher among plants grown at 80% RH and B concentrations of roots were lower compared to plants grown at 30% RH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–473 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B concentrations of roots were lower in plants grown at 80% RH than at 30% RH.

Material
Red Acee0
Organ / stage
rootse2
Treatment
plants grown at 80% RHe2
Outcome
B concentrations of rootse2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
plants grown at 30% RHe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“table beet (Beta vulgaris L. cv. Red Ace) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–143 · show in text ↑
e2

“Dry weights and B contents of shoots and roots were higher among plants grown at 80% RH and B concentrations of roots were lower compared to plants grown at 30% RH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–473 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot B concentrations were not affected by relative humidity.

Treatment
RHe3
Outcome
Shoot B concentrationse3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“table beet (Beta vulgaris L. cv. Red Ace) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–143 · show in text ↑
e3

“Shoot B concentrations were not affected by RH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–521 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth rate and B accumulation in shoots were closely correlated in plants grown at 30% or 80% RH.

Treatment
30% or 80% RHe4
Outcome
Rates of growth and B accumulation in shootse4
Qualifier
closely correlatede4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“table beet (Beta vulgaris L. cv. Red Ace) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–143 · show in text ↑
e4

“Rates of growth and B accumulation in shoots were closely correlated for plants grown in 30% or 80% RH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–625 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and B accumulation were not closely correlated in roots.

Organ / stage
rootse5
Outcome
These parameterse5
Qualifier
not closely correlatede5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“table beet (Beta vulgaris L. cv. Red Ace) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–143 · show in text ↑
e5

“These parameters were not closely correlated in roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–680 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rate of B uptake per g root dry weight was greater in plants with higher transpiration rates.

Treatment
higher transpiration ratese6
Outcome
The rate of B uptake per g root dry weighte6
Direction
greatere6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“table beet (Beta vulgaris L. cv. Red Ace) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–143 · show in text ↑
e6

“The rate of B uptake per g root dry weight was greater in plants having higher transpiration rates; whereas the rate of B translocation to shoots per g dry weight was independent of transpiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–882 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rate of B translocation to shoots per g dry weight was independent of transpiration rate.

Treatment
transpiration ratee6
Outcome
the rate of B translocation to shoots per g dry weighte6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6
Qualifier
independente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“table beet (Beta vulgaris L. cv. Red Ace) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–143 · show in text ↑
e6

“The rate of B uptake per g root dry weight was greater in plants having higher transpiration rates; whereas the rate of B translocation to shoots per g dry weight was independent of transpiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–882 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

B translocation to shoots is proposed to be controlled by rates of dry matter accumulation during rapid growth, a sink effect.

Outcome
B translocation to shootse7
Qualifier
rates of dry matter accumulation during stages of rapid growthe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“table beet (Beta vulgaris L. cv. Red Ace) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–143 · show in text ↑
e7

“Thus we propose that B translocation to shoots is controlled mechanistically by rates of dry matter accumulation during stages of rapid growth, i.e. a sink effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1046 · show in text ↑

humidity · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.