Paper · 2005 · Biological Agriculture & Horticulture

Effect of Three Species of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza on Bud Sprout and Ripening in Grapevine (Vitis viniferaL.) cv. Perlette

K. Usha; Rebecca Mathew; B. Singh

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
11
citations
5
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Investigations were carried out with grape cv. Perlette to assess the influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) on breaking bud dormancy, and hastening flowering, berry set and berry ripening. Eighteen year old vines of Perlette, having uniform vigour and growth, planted at 2.5 × 2.5 m and trained on a telephone system, were inoculated with three strains of AM namely Glomus mossae, Glomus deserticola and Gigaspora calospora, when the root system was active in February. Treatments with FYM and inorganic NPK were maintained as checks. The grapevines inoculated with Glomus deserticola took significantly fewer days for bud sprouting, inflorescence emergence, 50% flowering, berry set and ripening compared with all other treatments. The observations are discussed in relation to observed changes in the soil pH and leaf nutrient status. Hastening of bud sprouting, flowering, berry set and ripening in AM treated plants helped in harvesting the fruits before the onset of rains and reduced the damage due to monsoons. It is suggested that AM strain Glomus deserticola can potentially be included in the fertilizer management practice as an alternative to chemical fertilizers for providing the plant nutrient requirement.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vines inoculated with Glomus deserticola took significantly fewer days to bud sprouting, inflorescence emergence and 50% flowering than all other treatments.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise1
Material
cv. Perlettee2
Treatment
inoculated with Glomus deserticolae1
Interactor
Glomus deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae1symbiont
Outcome
days for bud sprouting, inflorescence emergence, 50% floweringe1
Direction
fewer dayse1
Comparator
all other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The grapevines inoculated with Glomus deserticola took significantly fewer days for bud sprouting, inflorescence emergence, 50% flowering, berry set and ripening compared with all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–742 · show in text ↑
e2

“Investigations were carried out with grape cv. Perlette”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vines inoculated with Glomus deserticola took significantly fewer days to berry set and ripening than all other treatments.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise1
Material
cv. Perlettee2
Treatment
inoculated with Glomus deserticolae1
Interactor
Glomus deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae1symbiont
Outcome
berry set and ripeninge1
Direction
fewer dayse1
Comparator
all other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The grapevines inoculated with Glomus deserticola took significantly fewer days for bud sprouting, inflorescence emergence, 50% flowering, berry set and ripening compared with all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–742 · show in text ↑
e2

“Investigations were carried out with grape cv. Perlette”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Hastened development in AM-treated grapevines helped harvest fruit before the onset of rains and reduced monsoon damage.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Treatment
AM treated plantse4
Outcome
damage due to monsoonse3
Direction
reducede3
Qualifier
harvesting the fruits before the onset of rainse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–88 · show in text ↑
e3

“helped in harvesting the fruits before the onset of rains and reduced the damage due to monsoons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1027 · show in text ↑
e4

“Hastening of bud sprouting, flowering, berry set and ripening in AM treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–930 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH and leaf nutrient status were observed to change in the mycorrhizal vines.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Outcome
soil pH and leaf nutrient statuse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“The observations are discussed in relation to observed changes in the soil pH and leaf nutrient status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–846 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus deserticola could be included in grapevine fertilizer management as an alternative to chemical fertilizers.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Interactor
Glomus deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae1symbiont
Outcome
fertilizer management practicee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“AM strain Glomus deserticola can potentially be included in the fertilizer management practice as an alternative to chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1186 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · pest · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · quality: postharvest · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.