Abstract
An experiment was undertaken to study the effects of two grafting times (1st of June and end of September) as well as kind of rootstock on growth and rooting of rose stentlings. Two Rosa species i.e. R. canina and R. manetti were selected as rootstock and three different hybrid tea rose cultivars namely Avalanch, Peach Avalanch and Dolcevita were grafted on them as scion through omega and splice techniques. The growth parameters were collected 57 days after grafting. The highest average of rooting, healing percentage, numbers of root, shoot and leaves were seen in September grafted plants. In overall Rosa canina was the best rootstock for Avalanch cultivar. Other observations did not lead to any prominent result as it varied with time of grafting, scion and rootstock cultivars.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
September grafting gave the highest rooting, healing, and root, shoot and leaf counts.
- Taxon
- Roset0
- Treatment
- September grafted plantse0
- Outcome
- rooting, healing percentage, numbers of root, shoot and leavese0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The highest average of rooting, healing percentage, numbers of root, shoot and leaves were seen in September grafted plants.”
t0“Rose”
Claim · model-written summary
Rosa canina was the best rootstock for Avalanch.
- Taxon
- Rosa canina
Rosa caninae0 - Material
- Avalanche0
- Outcome
- best rootstocke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In overall Rosa canina was the best rootstock for Avalanch cultivar.”
Claim · model-written summary
Other observations varied with grafting time, scion and rootstock cultivar without a prominent result.
Verbatim
e0“Other observations did not lead to any prominent result as it varied with time of grafting, scion and rootstock cultivars.”
t0“Rose”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · growth · RosaPositive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.