Paper · 2001 · Agronomy Journal

Weed Suppression by Annual Legume Cover Crops in No‐Tillage Corn

John W. Fisk; Oran B. Hesterman; Anil Shrestha; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
159
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cover crops often reduce density and biomass of annual weeds in no‐till cropping systems. However, cover crops that over‐winter also have the potential to reduce crop yield. Currently, there is an interest in annual medics ( Medicago spp.) and other annual legumes that winter‐kill for use as cover crops in midwestern grain cropping systems. A 2‐yr study was conducted at East Lansing and the Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan, to investigate the influence of annual legume cover crops on weed populations. Two annual medic species [burr medic ( M. polymorpha cv. Santiago) and barrel medic ( M. truncatula Gaertn. cv. Mogul)], berseem clover ( Trifolium alexandrinum L. cv. Bigbee), and medium red clover ( Trifolium pratense L.) were no‐till seeded as cover crops into winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) stubble in a winter wheat/corn ( Zea mays L.) rotation system. Density of winter annual weeds were between 41 and 78% lower following most cover crops when compared with no cover control in 2 out of 4 site years, while dry weight was between 26 and 80% lower in all 4 site years. Impact of cover crops on the density of summer annual weeds was infrequent; however, weed dry weights were reduced by 70% in 1995 following burr medic and barrel medic. Dry weight of perennial weeds before corn planting were 35 to 75% lower following annual legumes compared with the control, while weed density was not affected. This study indicated a potential for annual legumes to reduce weed density and growth in no‐till corn grain systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter annual weed density was 41 to 78% lower following most cover crops than with no cover, in 2 of 4 site years.

Treatment
cover cropse1
Interactor
winter annual weedse1weed
Outcome
Density of winter annual weedse1
Direction
lowere1
Value
41 and 78%e1
Qualifier
in 2 out of 4 site yearse1
Comparator
no cover controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat/corn ( Zea mays L.) rotation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–873 · show in text ↑
e1

“Density of winter annual weeds were between 41 and 78% lower following most cover crops when compared with no cover control in 2 out of 4 site years, while dry weight was between 26 and 80% lower in all 4 site years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter annual weed dry weight was 26 to 80% lower following cover crops than with no cover, in all 4 site years.

Treatment
cover cropse1
Interactor
winter annual weedse1weed
Outcome
dry weighte1
Direction
lowere1
Value
26 and 80%e1
Qualifier
in all 4 site yearse1
Comparator
no cover controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat/corn ( Zea mays L.) rotation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–873 · show in text ↑
e1

“Density of winter annual weeds were between 41 and 78% lower following most cover crops when compared with no cover control in 2 out of 4 site years, while dry weight was between 26 and 80% lower in all 4 site years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crops had an infrequent impact on the density of summer annual weeds.

Treatment
cover cropse2
Interactor
summer annual weedse2weed
Outcome
density of summer annual weedse2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat/corn ( Zea mays L.) rotation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–873 · show in text ↑
e2

“Impact of cover crops on the density of summer annual weeds was infrequent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed dry weights were reduced by 70% in 1995 following burr medic and barrel medic.

Treatment
burr medic and barrel medice3
Interactor
weede3weed
Outcome
weed dry weightse3
Direction
reducede3
Value
70%e3
Qualifier
in 1995e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat/corn ( Zea mays L.) rotation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–873 · show in text ↑
e3

“weed dry weights were reduced by 70% in 1995 following burr medic and barrel medic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Perennial weed dry weight before corn planting was 35 to 75% lower following annual legumes than in the control.

Treatment
annual legumese4
Interactor
perennial weedse4weed
Outcome
Dry weight of perennial weedse4
Direction
lowere4
Value
35 to 75%e4
Comparator
the controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat/corn ( Zea mays L.) rotation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–873 · show in text ↑
e4

“Dry weight of perennial weeds before corn planting were 35 to 75% lower following annual legumes compared with the control, while weed density was not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1420 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Perennial weed density was not affected by annual legumes.

Treatment
annual legumese4
Interactor
perennial weedse4weed
Outcome
weed densitye4
Direction
not affectede4
Comparator
the controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat/corn ( Zea mays L.) rotation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–873 · show in text ↑
e4

“Dry weight of perennial weeds before corn planting were 35 to 75% lower following annual legumes compared with the control, while weed density was not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1420 · show in text ↑

cover crop · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

28 papers: 16 positive, 12 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

cover crop · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

48 papers: 36 positive, 12 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.