Abstract
The effects of four rootstocks and two irrigation systems on tree growth, and fruit quality after storage in ‘Pacific Gala’ apple [(Malus × domestica) Borkh] were examined. Trees on ‘Budagovsky 9’ (‘B.9’) had a smaller trunk cross sectional area (TCA) and higher yield efficiency, while those on ‘Supporter4’ (‘Sup.4’) had larger TCA and lower yield efficiency than those on other rootstocks. Trees on ‘Nic.29’ (‘RN29’) had higher yield per tree as compared to those on other rootstocks. Trees on ‘RN29’ often had higher fruit weight, while trees on ‘B.9’ had lower fruit weight than did those on other rootstocks. Trees on ‘Sup.4’had lower yields and smaller fruits than those on ‘RN29’ every year. Fruits from trees on ‘B.9’ and ‘Cornell-Geneva30’ (‘CG.30’) often had higher soluble solids concentration (SSC) than other rootstocks at harvest and after storage. Fruits from trees on ‘CG.30’ also had higher fruit spoilage after storage. Trees with full sprinkler (FS) irrigation had higher TCA than those with the full drip (FD) system. ‘Gala’ fruit from trees with FS consistently had better color than those with the FD system every year.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Budagovsky 9 rootstock trees had a smaller trunk cross sectional area than trees on other rootstocks.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- Budagovsky 9e1
- Treatment
- rootstockse0
- Outcome
- trunk cross sectional area (TCA)e1
- Direction
- smallere1
- Comparator
- other rootstockse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The effects of four rootstocks and two irrigation systems on tree growth, and fruit quality after storage in ‘Pacific Gala’ apple [(Malus × domestica) Borkh] were examined”
e1“Trees on ‘Budagovsky 9’ (‘B.9’) had a smaller trunk cross sectional area (TCA) and higher yield efficiency”
e2“while those on ‘Supporter4’ (‘Sup.4’) had larger TCA and lower yield efficiency than those on other rootstocks”
Claim · model-written summary
Budagovsky 9 rootstock trees had higher yield efficiency than trees on other rootstocks.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- Budagovsky 9e1
- Treatment
- rootstockse0
- Outcome
- yield efficiencye1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- other rootstockse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The effects of four rootstocks and two irrigation systems on tree growth, and fruit quality after storage in ‘Pacific Gala’ apple [(Malus × domestica) Borkh] were examined”
e1“Trees on ‘Budagovsky 9’ (‘B.9’) had a smaller trunk cross sectional area (TCA) and higher yield efficiency”
e2“while those on ‘Supporter4’ (‘Sup.4’) had larger TCA and lower yield efficiency than those on other rootstocks”
Claim · model-written summary
Supporter4 rootstock trees had larger trunk cross sectional area than trees on other rootstocks.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- Supporter4e2
- Treatment
- rootstockse0
- Outcome
- TCAe2
- Direction
- largere2
- Comparator
- other rootstockse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The effects of four rootstocks and two irrigation systems on tree growth, and fruit quality after storage in ‘Pacific Gala’ apple [(Malus × domestica) Borkh] were examined”
e2“while those on ‘Supporter4’ (‘Sup.4’) had larger TCA and lower yield efficiency than those on other rootstocks”
Claim · model-written summary
Supporter4 rootstock trees had lower yield efficiency than trees on other rootstocks.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- Supporter4e2
- Treatment
- rootstockse0
- Outcome
- yield efficiencye2
- Direction
- lowere2
- Comparator
- other rootstockse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The effects of four rootstocks and two irrigation systems on tree growth, and fruit quality after storage in ‘Pacific Gala’ apple [(Malus × domestica) Borkh] were examined”
e2“while those on ‘Supporter4’ (‘Sup.4’) had larger TCA and lower yield efficiency than those on other rootstocks”
Claim · model-written summary
Nic.29 (RN29) rootstock trees had higher yield per tree than trees on other rootstocks.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- Nic.29e3
- Treatment
- rootstockse0
- Outcome
- yield per treee3
- Direction
- highere3
- Comparator
- other rootstockse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The effects of four rootstocks and two irrigation systems on tree growth, and fruit quality after storage in ‘Pacific Gala’ apple [(Malus × domestica) Borkh] were examined”
e3“Trees on ‘Nic.29’ (‘RN29’) had higher yield per tree as compared to those on other rootstocks”
Claim · model-written summary
Nic.29 (RN29) rootstock trees often had higher fruit weight than trees on other rootstocks.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- RN29e4
- Treatment
- rootstockse0
- Outcome
- fruit weighte4
- Direction
- highere4
- Qualifier
- oftene4
- Comparator
- other rootstockse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The effects of four rootstocks and two irrigation systems on tree growth, and fruit quality after storage in ‘Pacific Gala’ apple [(Malus × domestica) Borkh] were examined”
e4“Trees on ‘RN29’ often had higher fruit weight, while trees on ‘B.9’ had lower fruit weight than did those on other rootstocks”
Claim · model-written summary
Budagovsky 9 (B.9) rootstock trees had lower fruit weight than trees on other rootstocks.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- B.9e4
- Treatment
- rootstockse0
- Outcome
- fruit weighte4
- Direction
- lowere4
- Comparator
- other rootstockse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The effects of four rootstocks and two irrigation systems on tree growth, and fruit quality after storage in ‘Pacific Gala’ apple [(Malus × domestica) Borkh] were examined”
e4“Trees on ‘RN29’ often had higher fruit weight, while trees on ‘B.9’ had lower fruit weight than did those on other rootstocks”
Claim · model-written summary
Supporter4 (Sup.4) rootstock trees had lower yields than RN29 trees in every year.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- Sup.4e5
- Treatment
- rootstockse0
- Outcome
- yieldse5
- Direction
- lowere5
- Qualifier
- every yeare5
- Comparator
- RN29e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The effects of four rootstocks and two irrigation systems on tree growth, and fruit quality after storage in ‘Pacific Gala’ apple [(Malus × domestica) Borkh] were examined”
e5“Trees on ‘Sup.4’had lower yields and smaller fruits than those on ‘RN29’ every year”
Claim · model-written summary
Supporter4 (Sup.4) rootstock trees had smaller fruits than RN29 trees in every year.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- Sup.4e5
- Treatment
- rootstockse0
- Outcome
- fruitse5
- Direction
- smallere5
- Qualifier
- every yeare5
- Comparator
- RN29e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The effects of four rootstocks and two irrigation systems on tree growth, and fruit quality after storage in ‘Pacific Gala’ apple [(Malus × domestica) Borkh] were examined”
e5“Trees on ‘Sup.4’had lower yields and smaller fruits than those on ‘RN29’ every year”
Claim · model-written summary
Budagovsky 9 (B.9) rootstock fruit often had higher soluble solids concentration than other rootstocks at harvest and after storage.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- B.9e6
- Treatment
- rootstockse0
- Outcome
- soluble solids concentration (SSC)e6
- Direction
- highere6
- Qualifier
- at harvest and after storagee6
- Comparator
- other rootstockse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The effects of four rootstocks and two irrigation systems on tree growth, and fruit quality after storage in ‘Pacific Gala’ apple [(Malus × domestica) Borkh] were examined”
e6“Fruits from trees on ‘B.9’ and ‘Cornell-Geneva30’ (‘CG.30’) often had higher soluble solids concentration (SSC) than other rootstocks at harvest and after storage”
Claim · model-written summary
Cornell-Geneva30 (CG.30) rootstock fruit had higher soluble solids concentration than other rootstocks at harvest and after storage.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- CG.30e6
- Treatment
- rootstockse0
- Outcome
- soluble solids concentration (SSC)e6
- Direction
- highere6
- Qualifier
- at harvest and after storagee6
- Comparator
- other rootstockse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The effects of four rootstocks and two irrigation systems on tree growth, and fruit quality after storage in ‘Pacific Gala’ apple [(Malus × domestica) Borkh] were examined”
e6“Fruits from trees on ‘B.9’ and ‘Cornell-Geneva30’ (‘CG.30’) often had higher soluble solids concentration (SSC) than other rootstocks at harvest and after storage”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit from Cornell-Geneva30 (CG.30) trees had higher spoilage after storage.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- CG.30e7
- Outcome
- fruit spoilagee7
- Direction
- highere7
- Qualifier
- after storagee7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The effects of four rootstocks and two irrigation systems on tree growth, and fruit quality after storage in ‘Pacific Gala’ apple [(Malus × domestica) Borkh] were examined”
e7“Fruits from trees on ‘CG.30’ also had higher fruit spoilage after storage”
Claim · model-written summary
Trees with full sprinkler irrigation had higher trunk cross sectional area than trees with full drip irrigation.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae0 - Treatment
- full sprinkler (FS) irrigatione1
- Outcome
- TCAe1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- full drip (FD) systeme1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The effects of four rootstocks and two irrigation systems on tree growth, and fruit quality after storage in ‘Pacific Gala’ apple [(Malus × domestica) Borkh] were examined”
e1“Trees with full sprinkler (FS) irrigation had higher TCA than those with the full drip (FD) system”
Claim · model-written summary
Gala fruit from full sprinkler irrigated trees had better colour than fruit from full drip trees every year.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- Galae2
- Treatment
- FSe2
- Outcome
- colore2
- Direction
- bettere2
- Qualifier
- every yeare2
- Comparator
- FD systeme2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The effects of four rootstocks and two irrigation systems on tree growth, and fruit quality after storage in ‘Pacific Gala’ apple [(Malus × domestica) Borkh] were examined”
e2“‘Gala’ fruit from trees with FS consistently had better color than those with the FD system every year”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →grafting · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.