Paper · 2013 · MicrobiologyOpen

Effect of fungicides on epiphytic yeasts associated with strawberry

Jane Debode; Wendy Van Hemelrijck; Piet Creemers; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract We studied the effect of two commonly used fungicides on the epiphytic yeast community of strawberry. Greenhouse and field experiments were conducted applying Switch (cyprodinil plus fludioxonil) or Signum (boscalid plus pyraclostrobin) to strawberry plants. Yeasts on leaves and fruits were assessed on treated and untreated plants at several time points via plating and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis ( DGGE ) analysis. The yeast counts on plates of the treated plants were similar to the control plants. Unripe fruits had 10 times larger yeast concentrations than ripe fruits or leaves. Some dominant yeast types were isolated and in vitro tests showed that they were at least 10 times less sensitive to Switch and Signum as compared with two important fungal strawberry pathogens B otrytis cinerea and C olletotrichum acutatum , which are the targets for the fungicide control. DGGE analysis showed that the applied fungicides had no effect on the composition of the yeast communities, while the growing system, strawberry tissue, and sampling time did affect the yeast communities. The yeast species most commonly identified were C ryptococcus, R hodotorula, and S porobolomyces . These results point toward the potential applicability of natural occurring yeast antagonists into an integrated disease control strategy for strawberry diseases.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide-treated strawberry plants had yeast counts similar to controls.

Treatment
treated plantse0
Outcome
yeast counts on platese0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
control plantse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The yeast counts on plates of the treated plants were similar to the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–524 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unripe fruits had tenfold greater yeast concentrations than ripe fruits or leaves.

Organ / stage
Unripe fruitse0
Outcome
yeast concentrationse0
Direction
largere0
Value
10 timese0
Comparator
ripe fruits or leavese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Unripe fruits had 10 times larger yeast concentrations than ripe fruits or leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–607 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dominant yeast types were at least tenfold less sensitive to Switch and Signum than two strawberry fungal pathogens.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Outcome
less sensitive to Switch and Signume0
Direction
less sensitivee0
Value
at least 10 timese0
Comparator
B otrytis cinerea and C olletotrichum acutatume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they were at least 10 times less sensitive to Switch and Signum as compared with two important fungal strawberry pathogens B otrytis cinerea and C olletotrichum acutatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied fungicides did not change yeast community composition.

Treatment
applied fungicidese0
Outcome
composition of the yeast communitiese0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the applied fungicides had no effect on the composition of the yeast communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1006 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growing system, strawberry tissue and sampling time affected yeast communities.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Organ / stage
strawberry tissuee0
Outcome
yeast communitiese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growing system, strawberry tissue, and sampling time did affect the yeast communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cryptococcus, Rhodotorula and Sporobolomyces were the most commonly identified yeasts.

Outcome
yeast species most commonly identifiede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The yeast species most commonly identified were C ryptococcus, R hodotorula, and S porobolomyces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1201 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose naturally occurring yeast antagonists for integrated strawberry disease control.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Outcome
natural occurring yeast antagonists into an integrated disease control strategye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potential applicability of natural occurring yeast antagonists into an integrated disease control strategy for strawberry diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1365 · show in text ↑

fungicide · quality: general · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.