Abstract
Six chemicals namely; Chlorantraniliprole 20 S.C. @ 0.05 Kg a.i./ha), Chlothianidine 50% WDG @ 0.05 Kg a.i./ha), Imidacloprid 200 S.L. @ 0.02 Kg a.i./ha), Azadiractin 0.15 E.C. 0.03% a.i./ha) and Cartap Hydrochloride 50 W.S.P. 0.75 Kg a.i./ha) along with Chlorpyriphos 20 E.C. @ 1 Kg a.i./ha) as check insecticide were evaluated. Chlorantraniliprole @ 0.04% was most effective as it exhibited least dead hearts of 2.85% with the decrease of 83.43% in the incidence over control followed by Chlorpyriphos @ 0.5% with 4.69% dead hearts and it was statistically at par with Chlothianidine @ 0.25% and 0.50%. Higher dead hearts of 7.21% were observed with Imidacloprid @ 0.02 per cent whereas Azadiractin @ 0.5 per cent was found to be least effective insecticide exhibiting 10.33% dead hearts. Dead hearts in the untreated control were 17.21%. Hence, it can be suggested that Chlorantraniliprole @ 0–04% could be the most preferred option whereas Chlorpyriphos 20 EC 0.5%, Chlothianidine @ 0.5% and Imidacloprid @ 0.02% can be the next choice for ESB control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole gave 2.85% dead hearts, an 83.43% reduction from control.
Verbatim
e0“Chlorantraniliprole @ 0.04% was most effective as it exhibited least dead hearts of 2.85% with the decrease of 83.43% in the incidence over control”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorpyriphos gave 4.69% dead hearts.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“Chlorpyriphos @ 0.5% with 4.69% dead hearts”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorpyriphos was statistically at par with Chlothianidine at 0.25% and 0.50%.
Verbatim
e0“it was statistically at par with Chlothianidine @ 0.25% and 0.50%”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid gave 7.21% dead hearts.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- Imidacloprid @ 0.02 per cente0
- Outcome
- dead heartse0
- Direction
- Highere0
- Value
- 7.21%e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Higher dead hearts of 7.21% were observed with Imidacloprid @ 0.02 per cent”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Azadiractin was least effective, with 10.33% dead hearts.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- Azadiractin @ 0.5 per cente0
- Outcome
- dead heartse0
- Direction
- least effectivee0
- Value
- 10.33%e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Azadiractin @ 0.5 per cent was found to be least effective insecticide exhibiting 10.33% dead hearts”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Untreated control had 17.21% dead hearts.
Verbatim
e0“Dead hearts in the untreated control were 17.21%”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors prefer Chlorantraniliprole for early shoot borer control.
Verbatim
e0“Chlorantraniliprole @ 0–04% could be the most preferred option”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors list Chlorpyriphos, Chlothianidine and Imidacloprid as next choices.
Verbatim
e0“Chlorpyriphos 20 EC 0.5%, Chlothianidine @ 0.5% and Imidacloprid @ 0.02% can be the next choice for ESB control”
t0“sugarcane”
The same questions in other papers
imidacloprid · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →chlorpyrifos · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
chlorantraniliprole · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.