Paper · 1971 · Annals of Applied Biology

The effects of soil fumigation and nitrogen fertilizers on nematodes and sugar beet in sandy soils

D. A. COOKE; A. P. DRAYCOTT

17
claims
33
verbatim quotes
20
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY In fifteen experiments on light land infested with plant‐parasitic nematodes, fumigating the soil during the previous winter with D‐D increased the average yield of sugar‐beet roots from 25 to 36 t/ha; this was more than that obtained with various forms of nitrogenous fertilizers used in amounts up to 250 kg N/ha. Application of 85 kg N/ha increased yields on fumigated plots by 7 t/ha, and there was little benefit from giving more. Fumigation killed 65 % of the Pratylenchus spp., 80% of the Trichodorus spp. and 90% of the Tylenchorhynchus spp. in the top 5 cm of the soil and, at 15–20 cm deep, 90, 93 and 95% of these three genera. The increased yield from fumigant at different sites was not correlated with the initial populations of nematodes. The average increase in yield from fumigation was only poorly correlated with rainfall during May. The increases in nematode populations between April and August depended on rainfall, and were 0positively correlated both with the accumulated rainfall for the 10 weeks before sampling the soil in August and with the rainfall during the week previous to sampling. Fumigation not only improved the health of roots, and so enabled them to use nitrogen more efficiently, but also increased the amount of available nitrogen in the soil and decreased the amount lost by leaching. Injected anhydrous ammonia did not affect the populations of nematodes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D-D fumigation raised sugar beet root yield from 25 to 36 t/ha.

Treatment
fumigating the soil during the previous winter with D‐De0
Outcome
yield of sugar‐beet rootse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25 to 36 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fumigating the soil during the previous winter with D‐D increased the average yield of sugar‐beet roots from 25 to 36 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 85 kg N/ha increased yield on fumigated plots by 7 t/ha.

Treatment
Application of 85 kg N/hae0
Outcome
yields on fumigated plotse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 85 kg N/ha increased yields on fumigated plots by 7 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–395 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional nitrogen beyond 85 kg N/ha gave little yield benefit.

Treatment
giving moree0
Outcome
little benefite0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was little benefit from giving more”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–442 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation killed 65 % of Pratylenchus in the top 5 cm.

Treatment
Fumigatione0
Interactor
Pratylenchus spp.Pratylenchuse0pathogen
Outcome
Pratylenchus spp.e0
Direction
killede0
Value
65 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pratylenchus
Pratylenchus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fumigation killed 65 % of the Pratylenchus spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–491 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation killed 80% of Trichodorus in the top 5 cm.

Interactor
Trichodorus spp.Trichodoruse0pathogen
Outcome
Trichodorus spp.e0
Value
80%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichodorus
Trichodorus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Walter Peraza Padilla, National University of Costa Rica, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“80% of the Trichodorus spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–520 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation killed 90% of Tylenchorhynchus in the top 5 cm.

Interactor
Tylenchorhynchus spp.Tylenchorhynchuse0pathogen
Outcome
Tylenchorhynchus spp.e0
Value
90%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“90% of the Tylenchorhynchus spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–557 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation killed 90% of Pratylenchus at 15–20 cm depth.

Outcome
these three generae0
Value
90e0
Qualifier
15–20 cm deepe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 15–20 cm deep, 90, 93 and 95% of these three genera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation killed 93% of Trichodorus at 15–20 cm depth.

Outcome
these three generae0
Value
93e0
Qualifier
15–20 cm deepe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 15–20 cm deep, 90, 93 and 95% of these three genera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation killed 95% of Tylenchorhynchus at 15–20 cm depth.

Outcome
these three generae0
Value
95%e0
Qualifier
15–20 cm deepe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 15–20 cm deep, 90, 93 and 95% of these three genera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield gains from fumigation did not correlate with initial nematode populations.

Interactor
nematodesNematodae0pathogen
Outcome
increased yield from fumigante0
Direction
not correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increased yield from fumigant at different sites was not correlated with the initial populations of nematodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield gains from fumigation correlated poorly with May rainfall.

Outcome
increase in yield from fumigatione0
Setting
Maye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average increase in yield from fumigation was only poorly correlated with rainfall during May”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode population increases from April to August correlated positively with preceding ten week rainfall.

Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pathogen
Outcome
increases in nematode populationse0
Direction
0positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increases in nematode populations between April and August depended on rainfall, and were 0positively correlated both with the accumulated rainfall for the 10 weeks before sampling the soil in August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode population increases correlated positively with rainfall in the previous week.

Outcome
rainfalle0
Setting
week previous to samplinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with the rainfall during the week previous to sampling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation improved root health and nitrogen use efficiency.

Treatment
Fumigatione0
Outcome
health of rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fumigation not only improved the health of roots, and so enabled them to use nitrogen more efficiently”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation increased soil available nitrogen.

Outcome
amount of available nitrogen in the soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased the amount of available nitrogen in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation decreased nitrogen loss by leaching.

Outcome
amount lost by leachinge0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased the amount lost by leaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Injected anhydrous ammonia did not affect nematode populations.

Treatment
Injected anhydrous ammoniae0
Interactor
nematodesNematodae0pathogen
Outcome
populations of nematodese0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Injected anhydrous ammonia did not affect the populations of nematodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1406 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–83 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 142 positive, 19 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

solarization · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.