Abstract

Plots were established in a 'Ginger Gold' apple orchard to test the effects of different powdery mildew levels on cumulative yields. Disease pressure was heaviest in 1997 but yield effects were detected each year. Primary infection in 1997 and 1998 was correlated to previous foliar mildew incidence. Five myclobutanil applications followed by three of triadimefon (M5-T3) reduced primary infections in 1997 to 19% of those on trees not receiving a mildewcide (Ck). M5-T3 gave the most reduction in mildew incidence and severity but a schedule with two less applications (M3-T3) than M5-T3 gave the highest yield. Yields were lowest on trees not receiving a mildewcide. In 1998, the weakest and the strongest treatments had two and four times more flower clusters per tree, respectively, than Ck trees. Yield of the weakest mildew treatment (six applications of sulfur, S6), was about twice that of the Ck trees; several treatments yielded more than 2× S6. Increasing the number of sulfur applications from six to eight increased mildew control and yield. Most of the treatments resulted in yields higher than the nontreated control over a 3-year period. The M3-T3 treatment regime resulted in the highest 3-year yield, whereas a slightly more effective M5-T3 regime yielded slightly less. An economic analysis of cumulative treatment benefits, using local price inputs, is included.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield effects of powdery mildew were detected each year.

Interactor
Powdery Mildewt0pathogen
Outcome
yield effectse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Powdery Mildew on Apple Yield and Economic Benefits of Its Management in Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e2

“Disease pressure was heaviest in 1997 but yield effects were detected each year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–212 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease pressure was heaviest in 1997.

Interactor
Powdery Mildewt0pathogen
Outcome
Disease pressuree2
Qualifier
heaviest in 1997e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Powdery Mildew on Apple Yield and Economic Benefits of Its Management in Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e2

“Disease pressure was heaviest in 1997 but yield effects were detected each year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–212 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primary infection in 1997 and 1998 was correlated with previous foliar mildew incidence.

Interactor
mildewe3pathogen
Outcome
Primary infectione3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Powdery Mildew on Apple Yield and Economic Benefits of Its Management in Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e3

“Primary infection in 1997 and 1998 was correlated to previous foliar mildew incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five myclobutanil applications followed by three of triadimefon (M5-T3) reduced primary infections in 1997 to 19% of those on untreated trees.

Treatment
Five myclobutanil applications followed by three of triadimefon (M5-T3)e4
Interactor
Powdery Mildewt0pathogen
Outcome
primary infections in 1997e4
Direction
reducede4
Value
19%e4
Comparator
trees not receiving a mildewcidee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Powdery Mildew on Apple Yield and Economic Benefits of Its Management in Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e4

“Five myclobutanil applications followed by three of triadimefon (M5-T3) reduced primary infections in 1997 to 19% of those on trees not receiving a mildewcide (Ck)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M5-T3 gave the largest reduction in mildew incidence and severity.

Treatment
M5-T3e5
Interactor
Powdery Mildewt0pathogen
Outcome
mildew incidence and severitye5
Direction
most reductione5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Powdery Mildew on Apple Yield and Economic Benefits of Its Management in Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e5

“M5-T3 gave the most reduction in mildew incidence and severity but a schedule with two less applications (M3-T3) than M5-T3 gave the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The M3-T3 schedule, with two fewer applications than M5-T3, gave the highest yield.

Treatment
a schedule with two less applications (M3-T3)e5
Interactor
Powdery Mildewt0pathogen
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
higheste5
Comparator
M5-T3e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Powdery Mildew on Apple Yield and Economic Benefits of Its Management in Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e5

“M5-T3 gave the most reduction in mildew incidence and severity but a schedule with two less applications (M3-T3) than M5-T3 gave the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields were lowest on trees not receiving a mildewcide.

Treatment
not receiving a mildewcidee6
Interactor
Powdery Mildewt0pathogen
Outcome
Yieldse6
Direction
loweste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Powdery Mildew on Apple Yield and Economic Benefits of Its Management in Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e6

“Yields were lowest on trees not receiving a mildewcide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–668 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1998, the weakest and the strongest treatments had two and four times more flower clusters per tree than Ck trees.

Treatment
the weakest and the strongest treatmentse7
Interactor
Powdery Mildewt0pathogen
Outcome
flower clusters per treee7
Direction
moree7
Value
two and four timese7
Comparator
Ck treese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Powdery Mildew on Apple Yield and Economic Benefits of Its Management in Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e7

“In 1998, the weakest and the strongest treatments had two and four times more flower clusters per tree, respectively, than Ck trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of six sulfur applications (S6) was about twice that of Ck trees.

Treatment
six applications of sulfur, S6e1
Interactor
Powdery Mildewt0pathogen
Outcome
Yielde1
Direction
about twicee1
Comparator
Ck treese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Powdery Mildew on Apple Yield and Economic Benefits of Its Management in Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield of the weakest mildew treatment (six applications of sulfur, S6), was about twice that of the Ck trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–911 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several sulfur treatments yielded more than 2× S6.

Treatment
several treatmentse1
Interactor
Powdery Mildewt0pathogen
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
more thane1
Value
2×e1
Comparator
S6e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Powdery Mildew on Apple Yield and Economic Benefits of Its Management in Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“several treatments yielded more than 2× S6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–955 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing sulfur applications from six to eight increased mildew control and yield.

Treatment
Increasing the number of sulfur applications from six to eighte1
Interactor
Powdery Mildewt0pathogen
Outcome
mildew control and yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
sixe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Powdery Mildew on Apple Yield and Economic Benefits of Its Management in Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing the number of sulfur applications from six to eight increased mildew control and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most treatments gave higher yields than the nontreated control over a 3-year period.

Treatment
Most of the treatmentse1
Interactor
Powdery Mildewt0pathogen
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
over a 3-year periode1
Comparator
nontreated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Powdery Mildew on Apple Yield and Economic Benefits of Its Management in Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“Most of the treatments resulted in yields higher than the nontreated control over a 3-year period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The M3-T3 treatment regime gave the highest 3-year yield.

Treatment
The M3-T3 treatment regimee1
Interactor
Powdery Mildewt0pathogen
Outcome
3-year yielde1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Powdery Mildew on Apple Yield and Economic Benefits of Its Management in Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“The M3-T3 treatment regime resulted in the highest 3-year yield, whereas a slightly more effective M5-T3 regime yielded slightly less”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The slightly more effective M5-T3 regime yielded slightly less than M3-T3.

Treatment
a slightly more effective M5-T3 regimee1
Interactor
Powdery Mildewt0pathogen
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
slightly lesse1
Comparator
M3-T3e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Powdery Mildew on Apple Yield and Economic Benefits of Its Management in Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“The M3-T3 treatment regime resulted in the highest 3-year yield, whereas a slightly more effective M5-T3 regime yielded slightly less”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1288 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

sulfur atom · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.