Paper · 2009 · Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research

Effects of N fertilisation, year and prolamin alleles on gluten quality in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. ssp. turgidum) landraces from Spain

E. Aguiriano; M. Ruiz; R. Fité; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A subset of durum wheat Spanish landraces, previously evaluated for yield at low and high nitrogen (N) levels, was analysed for quality, protein content (P) and sodium dodecyl sulphate sedimentation (SDSS) test. The evaluation was carried out at the two N rates and in two years. The influence of prolamin alleles at the Glu-1, Glu-3, Glu-B2 and Gli-1 loci on quality parameters was also studied. The non significant Variety-by-Year or Variety-by-N interactions suggested that year and N affected all the varieties in a similar manner. Year and N effects were larger than variety effect for P, which increased with N. In contrast, variety genotype exhibited a stronger influence on SDSS test, which was not affected by year and fertilizer. Variety effects on P did not reflect the variety differences for SDSS test. A high positive influence of some prolamin alleles on quality parameters was detected, mainly for SDSS values. No correlation between yield and P was detected in the landraces adapted to low N. Based on the results of yield and quality evaluations, four landraces with high yield and high gluten strength were pre-selected for low N production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety by year and variety by nitrogen interactions were not significant, suggesting similar responses across varieties.

Material
landracest0
Outcome
Variety-by-Year or Variety-by-N interactionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The non significant Variety-by-Year or Variety-by-N interactions suggested that year and N affected all the varieties in a similar manner.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–535 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. ssp. turgidum) landraces from Spain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Year and nitrogen effects on protein content exceeded the variety effect.

Outcome
Pe0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
variety effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Year and N effects were larger than variety effect for P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content increased with nitrogen.

Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P, which increased with N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–617 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety genotype had a stronger influence on the SDSS test.

Material
variety genotypee0
Outcome
SDSS teste0
Direction
strongere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variety genotype exhibited a stronger influence on SDSS test”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–691 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Year did not affect the SDSS test.

Outcome
SDSS teste0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SDSS test, which was not affected by year and fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer did not affect the SDSS test.

Treatment
fertilizere0
Outcome
SDSS teste0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SDSS test, which was not affected by year and fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety effects on protein content did not reflect variety differences in the SDSS test.

Material
Varietye0
Outcome
SDSS teste0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Variety effects on P did not reflect the variety differences for SDSS test.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–815 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some prolamin alleles positively influenced quality parameters, mainly SDSS values.

Gene
prolamin allelese0
Outcome
quality parameterse0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
mainly for SDSS valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A high positive influence of some prolamin alleles on quality parameters was detected, mainly for SDSS values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield and protein content were uncorrelated in landraces adapted to low nitrogen.

Material
landracese0
Outcome
yield and Pe0
Qualifier
adapted to low Ne0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No correlation between yield and P was detected in the landraces adapted to low N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four landraces with high yield and gluten strength were preselected for low nitrogen production.

Material
landracese0
Outcome
high yield and high gluten strengthe0
Value
foure0
Qualifier
low N productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four landraces with high yield and high gluten strength were pre-selected for low N production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: physics · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.