Paper · 1988 · Tropical Pest Management

Efficacy of nuclear polyhedrosis virus with adjuvants as high volume and ultra low volume applications againstHeliothis armigeraHbn. on chickpea

R. J. Rabindra; S. Jayaraj

7
claims
20
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Heliothis armigera Hbn. is a major pest on chickpea Cicer arietinum L. causing serious damage to foliage, flowers and seeds. Field studies during 1985–86 have shown that the nuclear polyhedrosis virus (NPV) applied at the rate of 250 LE (1·5 x 1012 POB/ha) four times gave effective control of the pest and was comparable with the control achieved by endosulfan at 350 g a.i./ha by high volume application (500 litres spray fluid/ha). ULV application of NPV in 20% crude sugar (12·5 litres spray fluid/ha) was as effective as high volume application at the same dose of 250 LE/ha. Application of NPV 250 LE + endosulfan 175 g a.i./ha high volume gave the best results recording 1·58 larvae/20 plants, 4·2% leaf damage, 6·9% pod damage and 1159 kg grains/ha as against 3·75 larvae/20 plants, 4·9% leaf damage, 12·5% pod damage and 925 kg/ha of grain in NPV high volume treatment. The untreated check recorded 20·75 larvae/ 20 plants, 18·0% leaf damage, 26·4% pod damage and 590 kg grain/ha. The different adjuvants tested in the high volume application of NPV viz. crude sugar 0·5%, peanut oil cake 1%, chickpea flour 1 % or a combination of these did not improve the efficacy of the virus in the two field experiments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPV applied at 250 LE gave control of the pest comparable to endosulfan at 350 g a.i./ha in high volume application in field studies on chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
nuclear polyhedrosis virus (NPV) applied at the rate of 250 LEe1
Interactor
Heliothis armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Second interactor
nuclear polyhedrosis virusunidentified nuclear polyhedrosis virusese1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
control of the peste2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Comparator
endosulfan at 350 g a.i./hae2
Setting
Field studies during 1985–86e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heliothis armigera Hbn. is a major pest on chickpea Cicer arietinum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“Field studies during 1985–86 have shown that the nuclear polyhedrosis virus (NPV) applied at the rate of 250 LE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–245 · show in text ↑
e2

“gave effective control of the pest and was comparable with the control achieved by endosulfan at 350 g a.i./ha by high volume application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ULV application of NPV in 20% crude sugar was as effective as high volume application at the same dose of 250 LE/ha against the pest on chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
ULV application of NPV in 20% crude sugare3
Interactor
Heliothis armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Second interactor
NPVe3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
as effectivee4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Comparator
high volume application at the same dose of 250 LE/hae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heliothis armigera Hbn. is a major pest on chickpea Cicer arietinum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–79 · show in text ↑
e3

“ULV application of NPV in 20% crude sugar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–485 · show in text ↑
e4

“was as effective as high volume application at the same dose of 250 LE/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPV 250 LE plus endosulfan 175 g a.i./ha in high volume application gave the fewest larvae on chickpea, 1.58 per 20 plants, against 3.75 with NPV high volume treatment.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
NPV 250 LE + endosulfan 175 g a.i./ha high volumee5
Interactor
Heliothis armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Second interactor
NPVe5biocontrol_agent
Outcome
larvae/20 plantse5
Direction
decreaseinferrede5
Value
1·58 larvae/20 plantse5
Comparator
NPV high volume treatmente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heliothis armigera Hbn. is a major pest on chickpea Cicer arietinum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–79 · show in text ↑
e5

“Application of NPV 250 LE + endosulfan 175 g a.i./ha high volume gave the best results recording 1·58 larvae/20 plants, 4·2% leaf damage, 6·9% pod damage and 1159 kg grains/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–765 · show in text ↑
e6

“as against 3·75 larvae/20 plants, 4·9% leaf damage, 12·5% pod damage and 925 kg/ha of grain in NPV high volume treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPV 250 LE plus endosulfan 175 g a.i./ha in high volume application gave lower leaf damage on chickpea, 4.2%, against 4.9% with NPV high volume treatment.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
NPV 250 LE + endosulfan 175 g a.i./ha high volumee5
Interactor
Heliothis armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Second interactor
NPVe5biocontrol_agent
Outcome
leaf damagee5
Direction
decreaseinferrede5
Value
4·2%e5
Comparator
NPV high volume treatmente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heliothis armigera Hbn. is a major pest on chickpea Cicer arietinum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–79 · show in text ↑
e5

“Application of NPV 250 LE + endosulfan 175 g a.i./ha high volume gave the best results recording 1·58 larvae/20 plants, 4·2% leaf damage, 6·9% pod damage and 1159 kg grains/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–765 · show in text ↑
e6

“as against 3·75 larvae/20 plants, 4·9% leaf damage, 12·5% pod damage and 925 kg/ha of grain in NPV high volume treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPV 250 LE plus endosulfan 175 g a.i./ha in high volume application gave lower pod damage on chickpea, 6.9%, against 12.5% with NPV high volume treatment.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
NPV 250 LE + endosulfan 175 g a.i./ha high volumee5
Interactor
Heliothis armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Second interactor
NPVe5biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pod damagee5
Direction
decreaseinferrede5
Value
6·9%e5
Comparator
NPV high volume treatmente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heliothis armigera Hbn. is a major pest on chickpea Cicer arietinum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–79 · show in text ↑
e5

“Application of NPV 250 LE + endosulfan 175 g a.i./ha high volume gave the best results recording 1·58 larvae/20 plants, 4·2% leaf damage, 6·9% pod damage and 1159 kg grains/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–765 · show in text ↑
e6

“as against 3·75 larvae/20 plants, 4·9% leaf damage, 12·5% pod damage and 925 kg/ha of grain in NPV high volume treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPV 250 LE plus endosulfan 175 g a.i./ha in high volume application gave higher grain yield on chickpea, 1159 kg/ha, against 925 kg/ha with NPV high volume treatment.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
NPV 250 LE + endosulfan 175 g a.i./ha high volumee5
Interactor
Heliothis armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Second interactor
NPVe5biocontrol_agent
Outcome
grainse5
Direction
increaseinferrede5
Value
1159 kg grains/hae5
Comparator
NPV high volume treatmente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heliothis armigera Hbn. is a major pest on chickpea Cicer arietinum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–79 · show in text ↑
e5

“Application of NPV 250 LE + endosulfan 175 g a.i./ha high volume gave the best results recording 1·58 larvae/20 plants, 4·2% leaf damage, 6·9% pod damage and 1159 kg grains/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–765 · show in text ↑
e6

“as against 3·75 larvae/20 plants, 4·9% leaf damage, 12·5% pod damage and 925 kg/ha of grain in NPV high volume treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude sugar, peanut oil cake and chickpea flour adjuvants did not improve the efficacy of NPV in high volume application against the pest on chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
adjuvantse7
Interactor
Heliothis armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Second interactor
NPVe7biocontrol_agent
Outcome
efficacy of the viruse7
Direction
no_changeinferrede7
Comparator
high volume application of NPVe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heliothis armigera Hbn. is a major pest on chickpea Cicer arietinum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–79 · show in text ↑
e7

“The different adjuvants tested in the high volume application of NPV viz. crude sugar 0·5%, peanut oil cake 1%, chickpea flour 1 % or a combination of these did not improve the efficacy of the virus in the two field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1226 · show in text ↑

adjuvant · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

endosulfan · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.