Paper · 2003 · International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition

Nutritional enrichment of fresh apple (Royal Gala) by vacuum impregnation

J. Xie; Y. Zhao

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
59
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study evaluates the use of vacuum impregnation (VI) for developing nutritionally fortified fresh cut apples (Royal Gala). Cut apples were immersed in diluted high fructose corn syrup (20% w/w or 50% w/w) containing calcium or zinc. A vacuum pressure of 50 mmHg was applied for 15 min following atmospheric pressure restoration for 30 min while samples remained in the VI solution. Nutraceutical content and physicochemical properties of the apples immediately after VI were determined. Storability of VI apples at 6 degrees C and 90% relative humidity was also studied based on the color and texture of apples. Results indicated that 15-20% of the Daily Reference Intake of calcium and above 40% of the Daily Reference Intake of zinc could be obtained in 200 g fresh cut apples. VI treatments in 20% w/w high fructose corn syrup solutions had little effects on the physicochemical properties of apples. Storage study showed that VI with zinc significantly improved color stability, and calcium enhanced the firmness of the apples.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vacuum impregnation provided 15–20% of daily calcium intake in 200 g fresh-cut apples.

Material
Royal Galae1
Treatment
vacuum impregnation (VI)e1
Outcome
Daily Reference Intake of calciume0
Value
15-20%e0
Qualifier
200 g fresh cut applese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated that 15-20% of the Daily Reference Intake of calcium and above 40% of the Daily Reference Intake of zinc could be obtained in 200 g fresh cut apples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–783 · show in text ↑
e1

“This study evaluates the use of vacuum impregnation (VI) for developing nutritionally fortified fresh cut apples (Royal Gala).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vacuum impregnation provided above 40% of daily zinc intake in 200 g fresh-cut apples.

Material
Royal Galae1
Treatment
vacuum impregnation (VI)e1
Outcome
Daily Reference Intake of zince0
Value
above 40%e0
Qualifier
200 g fresh cut applese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated that 15-20% of the Daily Reference Intake of calcium and above 40% of the Daily Reference Intake of zinc could be obtained in 200 g fresh cut apples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–783 · show in text ↑
e1

“This study evaluates the use of vacuum impregnation (VI) for developing nutritionally fortified fresh cut apples (Royal Gala).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VI in 20% high-fructose corn syrup had little effect on apple physicochemical properties.

Treatment
VI treatments in 20% w/w high fructose corn syrup solutionse0
Outcome
physicochemical propertiese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“VI treatments in 20% w/w high fructose corn syrup solutions had little effects on the physicochemical properties of apples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

VI with zinc significantly improved apple color stability during storage.

Treatment
VI with zince0
Outcome
color stabilitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Storage study showed that VI with zinc significantly improved color stability, and calcium enhanced the firmness of the apples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1035 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium enhanced apple firmness during storage.

Treatment
calciume0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Storage study showed that VI with zinc significantly improved color stability, and calcium enhanced the firmness of the apples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1035 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

calcium atom · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

38 papers: 33 positive, 5 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.