Paper · 1997 · CIC-Digital (Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires)

Evaluation of Trichoderma harzianum and Gliocladium roseum in controlling leaf blotch of wheat (Septoria tritici) under in vitro and greenhouse conditions

Analía Perelló; Cecilia Inés Mónaco; Cristina Alicia Cordo

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
22
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

The suitability of Trichoderma harzianum and Gliocladium roseum as biocontrol agents on the in vitro growing of Septoria tritici and their efficiency in reducing disease severity on wheat plants was evaluated under greenhouse conditions. For the in vitro tests, the micro-organisms were confronted through dual cultures on PDA. A histopathological clarification and staining technique was used in order to observe, if the penetration and development of the pathogen on wheat leaves was modified in the presence of the antagonistic agents. A highly significant effect of T. harzianum and G. roseum on the development of S'. tritici colonies was observed. Both antagonistic agents grew over the S. tritici colony and covered it completely. T. harzianum was more efficient than G. roseum in inhibiting the pathogen. The coiling of the hypha of T. harzianum on short sections of S. tritici colony was observed with the bioassay on wheat leaves. The spore germination and the superficial mycelial development of S. tritici was affected by T. harzianum and G. roseum. Although, the further stomatic penetration of S. tritici was not restrained. The in vivo inhibitory capacity of the two antagonists assayed were not expressed on the wheat plants tested. However, there has been a tendency to reduce the percentage of necrotic area with pycnidial coverage when compared with the control. Further studies are needed before unequivocal conclusions can be drawn. Greenhouse experiments are in progress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both antagonists significantly affected S. tritici colony development.

Treatment
T. harzianum and G. roseume0
Interactor
S'. triticie0pathogen
Outcome
development of S'. tritici coloniese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A highly significant effect of T. harzianum and G. roseum on the development of S'. tritici colonies was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both antagonists completely covered the S. tritici colony.

Interactor
S. triticiZymoseptoria triticie0pathogen
Outcome
covered it completelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zymoseptoria tritici
Zymoseptoria tritici · InteractorMaccheek · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both antagonistic agents grew over the S. tritici colony and covered it completely.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum inhibited the pathogen more efficiently than G. roseum.

Treatment
T. harzianume0
Interactor
pathogene0pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
inhibiting the pathogene0
Direction
more efficiente0
Comparator
G. roseume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. harzianum was more efficient than G. roseum in inhibiting the pathogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. harzianum hyphae coiled around short sections of S. tritici colonies on wheat leaves.

Interactor
S. triticiZymoseptoria triticie0pathogen
Second interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
coiling of the hypha of T. harzianum on short sections of S. tritici colonye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zymoseptoria tritici
Zymoseptoria tritici · InteractorMaccheek · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The coiling of the hypha of T. harzianum on short sections of S. tritici colony was observed with the bioassay on wheat leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The antagonists affected S. tritici spore germination and surface mycelial development.

Treatment
T. harzianum and G. roseume0
Interactor
S. triticiZymoseptoria triticie0pathogen
Outcome
spore germination and the superficial mycelial development of S. triticie0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zymoseptoria tritici
Zymoseptoria tritici · InteractorMaccheek · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spore germination and the superficial mycelial development of S. tritici was affected by T. harzianum and G. roseum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The antagonists did not restrain subsequent stomatal penetration by S. tritici.

Treatment
Trichoderma harzianum and Gliocladium roseumt0
Interactor
S. triticiZymoseptoria triticie0pathogen
Outcome
stomatic penetration of S. triticie0
Direction
not restrainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zymoseptoria tritici
Zymoseptoria tritici · InteractorMaccheek · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the further stomatic penetration of S. tritici was not restrained.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Trichoderma harzianum and Gliocladium roseum in controlling leaf blotch of wheat (Septoria tritici) under in vitro and greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two antagonists did not show inhibitory capacity on the tested wheat plants.

Treatment
two antagonistse0
Outcome
in vivo inhibitory capacitye0
Direction
not expressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The in vivo inhibitory capacity of the two antagonists assayed were not expressed on the wheat plants tested.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1248 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Necrotic area with pycnidial coverage tended to decline relative to the control.

Treatment
Trichoderma harzianum and Gliocladium roseumt0
Outcome
percentage of necrotic area with pycnidial coveragee0
Direction
reducee0
Qualifier
tendencye0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there has been a tendency to reduce the percentage of necrotic area with pycnidial coverage when compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Trichoderma harzianum and Gliocladium roseum in controlling leaf blotch of wheat (Septoria tritici) under in vitro and greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–154 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma harzianum · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Clonostachys rosea · Zymoseptoria tritici · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · Zymoseptoria tritici · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Clonostachys rosea · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.