Paper · 2014 · Journal of Phytopathology

Effect of UV‐C Radiation on Resistance of Romaine Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Against Botrytis cinerea and Sclerotinia minor

Chayma Ouhibi; Houneida Attia; Philippe Nicot; et al.

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this research was to examine the effect of UV‐C on resistance of lettuce to Botrytis cinerea and Sclerotinia minor . Analysis of the lesion surfaces showed that plants exposed to UV‐C were less susceptible to the two pathogens, especially on the fourth day after inoculation. Chlorophyll, carotenoid contents and malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide were assayed after 1 day and 4 days. Lettuces treated with UV‐C and inoculated showed an increase in chlorophyll and carotenoid content, especially 24 h after inoculation, and low values of the two indicators of oxidative stress as compared with lettuces which were inoculated but did not receive UV‐C treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C exposed lettuce was less susceptible to Botrytis cinerea.

Treatment
UV‐Ce0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
less susceptiblee0
Direction
less susceptiblee0
Qualifier
fourth day after inoculatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa var. longifolia
Lactuca sativa var. longifolia · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants exposed to UV‐C were less susceptible to the two pathogens, especially on the fourth day after inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–295 · show in text ↑
t0

“Romaine Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Against Botrytis cinerea and Sclerotinia minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C exposed lettuce was less susceptible to Sclerotinia minor.

Treatment
UV‐Ce0
Interactor
Sclerotinia minorSclerotinia minort0pathogen
Outcome
less susceptiblee0
Direction
less susceptiblee0
Qualifier
fourth day after inoculatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa var. longifolia
Lactuca sativa var. longifolia · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants exposed to UV‐C were less susceptible to the two pathogens, especially on the fourth day after inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–295 · show in text ↑
t0

“Romaine Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Against Botrytis cinerea and Sclerotinia minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C treated inoculated lettuce increased chlorophyll and carotenoid content relative to inoculated untreated lettuce.

Taxon
LettucesLactuca sativae0
Treatment
UV‐Ce0
Outcome
chlorophyll and carotenoid contente0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
especially 24 h after inoculatione0
Comparator
lettuces which were inoculated but did not receive UV‐C treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lettuces treated with UV‐C and inoculated showed an increase in chlorophyll and carotenoid content, especially 24 h after inoculation, and low values of the two indicators of oxidative stress as compared with lettuces which were inoculated but did not receive UV‐C treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C treated inoculated lettuce had low oxidative stress indicators relative to inoculated untreated lettuce.

Taxon
LettucesLactuca sativae0
Treatment
UV‐Ce0
Outcome
two indicators of oxidative stresse0
Direction
low valuese0
Comparator
lettuces which were inoculated but did not receive UV‐C treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lettuces treated with UV‐C and inoculated showed an increase in chlorophyll and carotenoid content, especially 24 h after inoculation, and low values of the two indicators of oxidative stress as compared with lettuces which were inoculated but did not receive UV‐C treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–683 · show in text ↑

uv · physiology: oxidative · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

uv · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.