Paper · 2002 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

NITROGEN FERTILIZATION OF CONSERVATION-TILLED WHEAT. II. TIMING OF APPLICATION OF TWO NITROGEN SOURCES

D. D. Howard; M. A. Newman; M. E. Essington; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Nitrogen (N) applications to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) need to be timed for accelerated N uptake by the plant if highest yields and highest N use efficiency are to be attained. Applying N before accelerated uptake may allow soil losses while applications after accelerated uptake may restrict plant N utilization both of which may restrict yields. Research was conducted between 1997 and 2000 on Collins silt loam (Aquic Udifluvents). Pioneer 2552 was planted in 1997, Pioneer 2580 was planted in 1998, and Pioneer 2684 was planted in 1999. The experimental design was a split plot with treatments replicated five times. Main plots were N application timing (Feekes' growth scale of 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10) with ammonium nitrate (AN) and urea-ammonium nitrate (UAN) applied at 101 kg N ha−1 the sub-plots. Spring N application timing affected yields, test weights and disease severity. Yields over the three years were higher for broadcasting AN than UAN. Early N application at GS 5 lowered yields one of the three years while late N applications at GS 10 reduced yields two of three years. Take-all diseases may have reduced yields associated with delayed N timing one of the two years. Soil N losses from the early applications may have reduced yields. Reduced yields from late applications may be the result of applying N past the optimum N uptake period. Wheat test weights varied with N source but generally decreased with N application timing. Take-all severity increased with delayed N timing. However, the severity of glume blotch was not affected by timing of N applications.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast ammonium nitrate produced higher wheat yield than urea-ammonium nitrate across three years.

Treatment
broadcasting ANe0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
UANe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields over the three years were higher for broadcasting AN than UAN.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–963 · show in text ↑
e1

“applications to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early nitrogen application at GS 5 lowered yields in one of three years.

Treatment
Early N application at GS 5e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
lowerede0
Qualifier
one of the three yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early N application at GS 5 lowered yields one of the three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1029 · show in text ↑
e1

“applications to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late nitrogen application at GS 10 reduced yields in two of three years.

Treatment
late N applications at GS 10e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
two of three yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“late N applications at GS 10 reduced yields two of three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1098 · show in text ↑
e1

“applications to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–66 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat test weights varied with nitrogen source.

Treatment
N sourcee0
Outcome
test weightse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat test weights varied with N source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1407 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat test weights generally decreased with later nitrogen application.

Treatment
N application timinge0
Outcome
test weightse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat test weights varied with N source but generally decreased with N application timing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1458 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Take-all severity increased with delayed nitrogen timing in wheat.

Treatment
delayed N timinge0
Outcome
Take-all severitye0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Take-all severity increased with delayed N timing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1509 · show in text ↑
e1

“applications to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glume blotch severity was not affected by nitrogen application timing in wheat.

Treatment
timing of N applicationse0
Outcome
severity of glume blotche0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the severity of glume blotch was not affected by timing of N applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1593 · show in text ↑
e1

“applications to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–66 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Take-all disease may have reduced yields with delayed nitrogen timing in one year.

Treatment
delayed N timinge0
Outcome
yieldse0
Qualifier
may have reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Take-all diseases may have reduced yields associated with delayed N timing one of the two years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1196 · show in text ↑
e1

“applications to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–66 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrogen losses from early applications may have reduced wheat yields.

Treatment
early applicationse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Qualifier
Soil N lossese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil N losses from the early applications may have reduced yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1263 · show in text ↑
e1

“applications to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–66 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying nitrogen beyond the optimum uptake period may explain reduced wheat yields from late applications.

Treatment
late applicationse0
Outcome
Reduced yieldse0
Qualifier
applying N past the optimum N uptake periode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced yields from late applications may be the result of applying N past the optimum N uptake period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1367 · show in text ↑
e1

“applications to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–66 · show in text ↑

ammonium nitrate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 49 positive, 5 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

transplanting · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 129 positive, 47 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.