Paper · 2013 · Journal of Plant Interactions

Separate and combined effects of excess copper and Fusarium culmorum infection on growth and antioxidative enzymes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants

V. Nenova; I. Bogoeva

12
claims
30
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of stress combinations on plants cannot be extrapolated from the response to each of the applied stressors. Greenhouse experiments were carried out on soil to which copper ions were introduced at four concentrations (0, 150, 400, and 600 mg kg−1). Copper treatments without or with Fusarium infection were established. Both stress factors, applied separately or together inhibited growth with the exception of the lowest Cu concentration, which stimulated growth of healthy plants. Depending on concentration, Cu did not change or increased the activity of root peroxidase and leaf catalase, and decreased ascorbate peroxidase (APO) activity in leaves and roots. Infection increased the activities of the enzymes with exception of root APO. The simultaneous presence of these two stress factors modified their individual effects. Generally, the stress combination aggravated the plant status though an opposite trend was observed in some cases.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper stress inhibited wheat growth except at the lowest concentration.

Treatment
Cue0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
exception of the lowest Cu concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both stress factors, applied separately or together inhibited growth with the exception of the lowest Cu concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–448 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium infection inhibited wheat growth.

Treatment
Fusarium infectione1
Interactor
FusariumFusariume1pathogen
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both stress factors, applied separately or together inhibited growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–398 · show in text ↑
e1

“Copper treatments without or with Fusarium infection were established”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–328 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined copper and infection inhibited wheat growth.

Treatment
Both stress factorse0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume1pathogen
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both stress factors, applied separately or together inhibited growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–398 · show in text ↑
e1

“Copper treatments without or with Fusarium infection were established”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–328 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest copper concentration stimulated growth of healthy wheat.

Treatment
lowest Cu concentratione0
Outcome
growth of healthy plantse0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest Cu concentration, which stimulated growth of healthy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–491 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper did not change root peroxidase activity at some concentrations.

Treatment
Cue0
Outcome
activity of root peroxidasee0
Direction
did not changee0
Qualifier
Depending on concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Depending on concentration, Cu did not change or increased the activity of root peroxidase and leaf catalase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–601 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper increased root peroxidase activity at some concentrations.

Treatment
Cue0
Outcome
activity of root peroxidasee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
Depending on concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Depending on concentration, Cu did not change or increased the activity of root peroxidase and leaf catalase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–601 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper did not change leaf catalase activity at some concentrations.

Treatment
Cue0
Outcome
leaf catalasee0
Direction
did not changee0
Qualifier
Depending on concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Depending on concentration, Cu did not change or increased the activity of root peroxidase and leaf catalase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–601 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper increased leaf catalase activity at some concentrations.

Treatment
Cue0
Outcome
leaf catalasee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
Depending on concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Depending on concentration, Cu did not change or increased the activity of root peroxidase and leaf catalase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–601 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper decreased leaf ascorbate peroxidase activity.

Treatment
Cue1
Gene
ascorbate peroxidase (APO)e0
Outcome
ascorbate peroxidase (APO) activity in leavese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased ascorbate peroxidase (APO) activity in leaves and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–672 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cu did not change or increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–551 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper decreased root ascorbate peroxidase activity.

Treatment
Cue1
Gene
ascorbate peroxidase (APO)e0
Outcome
ascorbate peroxidase (APO) activity in leaves and rootse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased ascorbate peroxidase (APO) activity in leaves and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–672 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cu did not change or increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–551 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection increased enzyme activities except root APO.

Treatment
Infectione0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume1pathogen
Outcome
activities of the enzymese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
exception of root APOe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Infection increased the activities of the enzymes with exception of root APO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–750 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fusarium infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–311 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined copper and infection generally worsened wheat status, with some opposite cases.

Treatment
stress combinatione0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume1pathogen
Outcome
plant statuse0
Direction
aggravatede0
Qualifier
opposite trend was observed in some casese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Generally, the stress combination aggravated the plant status though an opposite trend was observed in some cases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–954 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fusarium infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–311 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–146 · show in text ↑

copper atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

copper atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

61 papers: 31 positive, 30 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Fusarium · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 0 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

infection · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 13 positive, 46 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.