Paper · 1996 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Effect of hot air disinfestation treatment in combination with simulated air freight conditions on quality of 'Kensington' mango ( Mangifera indica Linn.

KK Jacobi; LS Wong; JE Giles

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The quality of 'Kensington' mangoes (Mangifera indica Linn.) from 2 major Queensland production regions was evaluated following a hot air [HAT, also known as vapour heat (VHT)] disinfestation treatment (46.5¦C seed surface temperature held for 10 min under conditions of high humidity) combined with a disease control treatment (55¦C water for 5 min) prior to HAT, and storage conditions likely to be encountered during air shipment to Japan (either 10¦C for 5 days plus 22¦C for 5 days, or 13¦C for 5 days plus 22¦C for 5 days, or 22¦C for 10 days). Final quality was optimum if fruit were treated with HAT alone and stored at 22¦C. Fruit injury, in the form of skin browning and lenticel spotting, was particularly severe in HAT plus disease controI fruit stored at 10/22¦C. Storage at 10¦C combined with heat treatments may be too stressful to fruit physiology, leading to fruit injury and reduced fruit quality at the market destination.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Final fruit quality was optimal with HAT alone and 22¦C storage.

Treatment
HAT alone and stored at 22¦Ce0
Outcome
Final qualitye0
Direction
optimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Final quality was optimum if fruit were treated with HAT alone and stored at 22¦C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined HAT and disease control with 10/22¦C storage caused severe skin browning and lenticel spotting.

Treatment
HAT plus disease controI fruit stored at 10/22¦Ce0
Outcome
skin browning and lenticel spottinge0
Direction
particularly severee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit injury, in the form of skin browning and lenticel spotting, was particularly severe in HAT plus disease controI fruit stored at 10/22¦C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–128 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest 10¦C storage with heat treatment may stress fruit physiology and reduce destination quality.

Treatment
Storage at 10¦C combined with heat treatmentse0
Outcome
reduced fruit qualitye0
Qualifier
too stressful to fruit physiologye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Storage at 10¦C combined with heat treatments may be too stressful to fruit physiology, leading to fruit injury and reduced fruit quality at the market destination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–128 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: general · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 26 positive, 8 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

storage · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 36 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.