Paper · 2007 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Nitrogen Application in Winter Wheat Grown in Mediterranean Conditions: Effects on Nitrogen Uptake, Utilization Efficiency, and Soil Nitrogen Deficit

Francesco Montemurro; Grazia Convertini; Donato Ferri

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Nitrogen (N) is one of the most growth restricting nutrients in cereal grain and represents one of the highest input costs in agricultural systems; therefore, environmental and economic considerations require the effective use of N fertilizer in plant production. This study was conducted for three years to better understand wheat plant response to optimize N fertilizer and how to reduce the risk of ground water pollution. Two of the most important durum wheat cultivars in Southern Italy and four N fertilization levels (0, 60, 120, and 180 kg N ha− 1, indicated as N0, N60, N120, and N180, respectively) were compared in this experiment. During plant growth, fresh and dry matter, plant nutritional state (SPAD readings and stem nitrate content), and N uptake were determined. At harvest, plant N content, N uptake, grain yield, yield components and quality were determined, allowing the calculation of the pre- and postanthesis N uptake and the N utilization efficiency indices. Furthermore, at the beginning and at the end of each year, soil mineral N was measured to calculate mineral N deficit in the soil. The results indicated that the treatment with 120 kg N ha− 1 of fertilizer ensures a good balance between yield and N utilization. In fact, N180 and N120 showed similar yield (3.01 and 3.07 t ha− 1, respectively) and protein content (13.7 and 13.5 %). Meanwhile, throughout the three-year experiment, N180 presented the highest final mineral N content in the soil at the end of the cropping cycles, increasing the amount of N available for leaching. The N120 treatment showed the same values of N utilization indices as compared to N180, indicating that further doses of N fertilizer did not increase wheat N utilization. Plant N status shows that it is possible to modify the N fertilization to reach its optimum level during plant growth, in accordance with variable weather conditions, and consequently the plants requirements. The mean treatments of the preanthesis N uptake were about 67.5% of the total N uptake, and it was significantly and positively correlated with wheat yield. On the contrary, the postanthesis N uptake showed positive correlation with grain protein content, confirming the importance of late N supply in grains quality. The variation of weather conditions affected winter wheat yield, quality, N utilization and plant N status, but any difference throughout years was found between N180 and N120, confirming that higher N rate did not influence wheat growth, yield, and N uptake.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 120 kg N ha− 1 of fertilizer gives a good balance between yield and N utilization

Treatment
120 kg N ha− 1 of fertilizere1
Outcome
a good balance between yield and N utilizatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“durum wheat cultivars in Southern Italy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–500 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results indicated that the treatment with 120 kg N ha− 1 of fertilizer ensures a good balance between yield and N utilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N180 and N120 showed similar yield, 3.01 and 3.07 t ha− 1

Treatment
N180e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
similare1
Value
3.01 and 3.07 t ha− 1e1
Comparator
N120e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“durum wheat cultivars in Southern Italy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–500 · show in text ↑
e1

“In fact, N180 and N120 showed similar yield (3.01 and 3.07 t ha− 1, respectively) and protein content (13.7 and 13.5 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N180 and N120 showed similar protein content, 13.7 and 13.5 %

Treatment
N180e1
Outcome
protein contente1
Direction
similare1
Value
13.7 and 13.5 %e1
Comparator
N120e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“durum wheat cultivars in Southern Italy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–500 · show in text ↑
e1

“In fact, N180 and N120 showed similar yield (3.01 and 3.07 t ha− 1, respectively) and protein content (13.7 and 13.5 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N180 gave the highest final mineral N content in the soil at the end of the cropping cycles

Treatment
N180e1
Outcome
final mineral N content in the soile1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“durum wheat cultivars in Southern Italy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–500 · show in text ↑
e1

“Meanwhile, throughout the three-year experiment, N180 presented the highest final mineral N content in the soil at the end of the cropping cycles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N120 showed the same N utilization indices as N180

Treatment
N120e1
Outcome
N utilization indicese1
Direction
the same valuese1
Comparator
N180e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“durum wheat cultivars in Southern Italy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–500 · show in text ↑
e1

“The N120 treatment showed the same values of N utilization indices as compared to N180”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Further doses of N fertilizer did not increase wheat N utilization

Treatment
further doses of N fertilizere1
Outcome
wheat N utilizatione1
Direction
did not increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“durum wheat cultivars in Southern Italy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–500 · show in text ↑
e1

“indicating that further doses of N fertilizer did not increase wheat N utilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1745 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The preanthesis N uptake was about 67.5% of the total N uptake

Outcome
preanthesis N uptakee1
Value
about 67.5%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“durum wheat cultivars in Southern Italy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–500 · show in text ↑
e1

“The mean treatments of the preanthesis N uptake were about 67.5% of the total N uptake, and it was significantly and positively correlated with wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1956–2111 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Preanthesis N uptake was significantly and positively correlated with wheat yield

Treatment
preanthesis N uptakee1
Outcome
wheat yielde1
Direction
positivelye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“durum wheat cultivars in Southern Italy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–500 · show in text ↑
e1

“The mean treatments of the preanthesis N uptake were about 67.5% of the total N uptake, and it was significantly and positively correlated with wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1956–2111 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postanthesis N uptake showed positive correlation with grain protein content

Treatment
postanthesis N uptakee1
Outcome
grain protein contente1
Direction
positive correlatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“durum wheat cultivars in Southern Italy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–500 · show in text ↑
e1

“On the contrary, the postanthesis N uptake showed positive correlation with grain protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2113–2210 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variation of weather conditions affected winter wheat yield and quality

Treatment
variation of weather conditionse1
Outcome
winter wheat yield, qualitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“durum wheat cultivars in Southern Italy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–500 · show in text ↑
e1

“The variation of weather conditions affected winter wheat yield, quality, N utilization and plant N status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2274–2380 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variation of weather conditions affected N utilization and plant N status

Treatment
variation of weather conditionse1
Outcome
N utilization and plant N statuse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“durum wheat cultivars in Southern Italy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–500 · show in text ↑
e1

“The variation of weather conditions affected winter wheat yield, quality, N utilization and plant N status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2274–2380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A higher N rate did not influence wheat growth, yield or N uptake compared with N120

Treatment
higher N ratee1
Outcome
wheat growth, yield, and N uptakee1
Direction
did not influencee1
Comparator
N120e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“durum wheat cultivars in Southern Italy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–500 · show in text ↑
e1

“any difference throughout years was found between N180 and N120, confirming that higher N rate did not influence wheat growth, yield, and N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2386–2532 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Plant N status indicates that the N fertilization can be modified to reach its optimum level during plant growth

Outcome
modify the N fertilization to reach its optimum level during plant growthe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“durum wheat cultivars in Southern Italy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–500 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant N status shows that it is possible to modify the N fertilization to reach its optimum level during plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1747–1864 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 46 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Nitrogen starvation negatively affected spike and seed traits.

    Transcriptomic response of durum wheat to nitrogen starvation · 2017

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.