Paper · 1971 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Effects of nitrogen fertilizer, plant population and irrigation on sugar beet: II. Nutrient concentration and uptake

A. P. Draycott; M. J. Durrant

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY The concentration of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, sodium, calcium and magnesium was measured in the dry matter of sugar beet from four field experiments (1966–9). All combinations of four amounts of nitrogen fertilizer (0–1·8 cwt/acre), four plant populations (8800–54000 plants/acre) and irrigation were tested, which gave a wide range of plant size and yield. Nutrient concentration and uptake by the crop were also greatly affected by the treatments. Nitrogen fertilizer and irrigation increased uptake of nitrogen by the crop but increasing the plant population had little effect on uptake and decreased the concentration of nitrogen. Sugar yield was related to the total nitrogen concentration in tops and roots and to uptake. There were optimal values of nitrogen concentration for maximal sugar yield, but the optima were greatly affected by plant population. Leaf colour was a good guide to nitrogen concentration. Phosphorus concentration was affected little by the treatments but cation concentrations were greatly affected. In general, uptake of all the elements was increased by all treatments – the exception was sodium, which decreased as the plant population increased but this was balanced to somo extent by increased potassium uptake.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer increased nitrogen uptake by sugar beet.

Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
uptake of nitrogene0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nitrogen fertilizer and irrigation increased uptake of nitrogen by the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–541 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased nitrogen uptake by sugar beet.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
uptake of nitrogene0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nitrogen fertilizer and irrigation increased uptake of nitrogen by the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–541 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing plant population had little effect on sugar beet nitrogen uptake.

Treatment
increasing the plant populatione0
Outcome
uptakee0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“increasing the plant population had little effect on uptake and decreased the concentration of nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing plant population decreased sugar beet nitrogen concentration.

Treatment
increasing the plant populatione0
Outcome
concentration of nitrogene0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“increasing the plant population had little effect on uptake and decreased the concentration of nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–650 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar yield was related to nitrogen concentration in tops and roots and nitrogen uptake.

Organ / stage
tops and rootse0
Compound
nitrogene0
Outcome
Sugar yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sugar yield was related to the total nitrogen concentration in tops and roots and to uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–743 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal nitrogen concentrations for maximal sugar yield depended strongly on plant population.

Treatment
plant populatione0
Compound
nitrogene0
Outcome
maximal sugar yielde0
Direction
maximale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“There were optimal values of nitrogen concentration for maximal sugar yield, but the optima were greatly affected by plant population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–878 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf colour was a good guide to nitrogen concentration.

Organ / stage
Leafe0
Outcome
nitrogen concentratione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“Leaf colour was a good guide to nitrogen concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments had little effect on phosphorus concentration.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
Phosphorus concentratione0
Direction
affected littlee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“Phosphorus concentration was affected little by the treatments but cation concentrations were greatly affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments greatly affected cation concentrations.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
cation concentrationse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“Phosphorus concentration was affected little by the treatments but cation concentrations were greatly affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments generally increased elemental uptake.

Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
uptake of all the elementse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“In general, uptake of all the elements was increased by all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing plant population decreased sodium uptake.

Treatment
plant population increasede0
Outcome
sodiume0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“the exception was sodium, which decreased as the plant population increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1195 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased potassium uptake balanced the decrease in sodium uptake to some extent.

Outcome
potassium uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“this was balanced to somo extent by increased potassium uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1263 · show in text ↑

density · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

density · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 46 positive, 13 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.