Paper · 2013 · Acta Agrobotanica

The effect of sucrose and 8-hydroxyquinoline sulphate (8-HQS) on keeping qualities of bud-cut Chrysanthemum flowers and the level of reducing sugars in the florets

Aleksandra Łukaszewska

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Chrysanthemums harvested as buds of 50-60 mm in diameter and held in the solutions of sucrose and 8-HQS had inflorescences of quality equal to those opened on the plant and better than flowers placed in water. Exogenous sucrose prolonged vase-life of cv. 'Bronze Bornholm' but did not affect cv. 'Crimson Robe'. No difference was observed in the quality of flowers placed in different sucrose concentrations. All the solutions which improved keeping qualities of cut chrysanthemums caused considerable increase in the flower fresh and dry matter. Also an increase in reducing sugars was found in flowers of both cultivars he1d in the solutions of sucrose and 8-HQS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose and 8-HQS improved cut inflorescence quality over water.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumsChrysanthemume0
Treatment
solutions of sucrose and 8-HQSe0
Outcome
inflorescences of qualitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
flowers placed in watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chrysanthemums harvested as buds of 50-60 mm in diameter and held in the solutions of sucrose and 8-HQS had inflorescences of quality equal to those opened on the plant and better than flowers placed in water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous sucrose prolonged vase life of Bronze Bornholm.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
cv. 'Bronze Bornholm'e0
Treatment
Exogenous sucrosee0
Outcome
vase-lifee0
Direction
prolongede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Exogenous sucrose prolonged vase-life of cv. 'Bronze Bornholm' but did not affect cv. 'Crimson Robe'.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous sucrose did not affect vase life of Crimson Robe.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Material
cv. 'Crimson Robe'e0
Treatment
Exogenous sucrosee0
Outcome
vase-lifee0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Exogenous sucrose prolonged vase-life of cv. 'Bronze Bornholm' but did not affect cv. 'Crimson Robe'.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower quality did not differ across sucrose concentrations.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
different sucrose concentrationse0
Outcome
quality of flowerse0
Direction
No differencee0
Comparator
different sucrose concentrationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“No difference was observed in the quality of flowers placed in different sucrose concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solutions that improved keeping quality increased flower fresh and dry matter.

Taxon
cut chrysanthemumse0
Treatment
solutions which improved keeping qualitiese0
Outcome
flower fresh and dry mattere0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“All the solutions which improved keeping qualities of cut chrysanthemums caused considerable increase in the flower fresh and dry matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose and 8-HQS increased reducing sugars in flowers of both cultivars.

Taxon
ChrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
solutions of sucrose and 8-HQSe0
Outcome
reducing sugarse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Also an increase in reducing sugars was found in flowers of both cultivars he1d in the solutions of sucrose and 8-HQS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–665 · show in text ↑

sucrose · quality: sugar starch · ChrysanthemumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sucrose · quality: general · ChrysanthemumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sucrose · quality: postharvest · ChrysanthemumResults agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.